Asked
whether police response time at the 1200 building was acceptable, Dale said: «I don't know what acceptable is.
Not exact matches
The government
response became necessary after the European court of human rights (ECHR) found current British practise - where the DNA of those taken to a
police station is kept indefinitely regardless of
whether they are later convicted - to be illegal.
The timing of Gurley's death comes at a particularly sensitive time for the department, which is bracing for possible demonstrations and protests in
response to a decision from a grand jury in Ferguson, Missouri, about
whether to proceed with a criminal case against a white
police officer who fatally shot an unarmed teenager.
A trained and certified ARC operator will listen in to audio received from a lone worker device activation, if safe to do so speaks to the user, and then considers this, alongside other information, to determine
whether requesting a level 1
Police response would be appropriate.
Her concerns over
whether schools are improving have not extended to underperforming charter schools, and her
response when challenged on this is simply unacceptable: She says the district doesn't have enough money to oversee the charters properly and she doesn't want to do more to
police them.
Of my writings published online on this blog and The Huffington Post since last April 2010, the ones that have in any small way gone viral, very relatively speaking, were those in which I wrote fast enough about current hot news items or ones relating or engaging with artworld celebrities: as one example, «My Whole Street is A Mosque,» written within 24 hours of the news cycle surrounding the proposal for a Islamic cultural center near Ground Zero, was picked up by various web aggregators; «Looking for Art to Love, MoMA: A Tale of Two Egos» also did very well because of my speculation about how or
whether Marina Abramovic peed during her performance «The Artist is Present» at MoMA, a subject of much prurient curiosity (interesting speculation was illustrated online at New York Magazine and resolution of the mystery came in the Wall Street Journal's blog, «Speakeasy»); «Anselm Kiefer@Larry Gagosian: Last Century in Berlin,» where I tucked a critical
response to Kiefer's recent show into a bit of reporting about how Gagosian Gallery was using the NYPD as its private
police force, also created a spike on my Google analytics; more recently I could perceive a noticeable uptick in my readership as well as in the number and enthusiasm of my Facebook friends» comments for «Should we trust anyone under 30?
The debate has raged over differing interpretations of «lawful authority», and there are conflicting decisions from the Courts over
whether internet service providers can disclose customer name and address information to the
police in
response to a request.
The officer's
response was said by the trial judge to be misleading (although not a «trick») because, she said, it deprived Mr. Ekman of his ability to make an informed choice about
whether to speak to the
police in the absence of counsel.
However, by the time the accused is given his third opportunity to call a lawyer, has refused for the third time, and has replied in
response to a question as to
whether he understands, in the affirmative, I am of the view that the
police have complied with their obligations pursuant to s. 10 (b) of the Charter.
In Ekman, [2000] B.C.J. No. 1363, the BCCA discussed the «correctness» of the legal advice given by the officer and if it caused confusion:... The critical question is
whether the officer's
response — that «a lawyer doesn't have a right to be present when someone is questioned by the
police», that a lawyer has «a right to give you advice on
whether or not to speak to the
police» and «the Canadian law is that it's up to you, to decide for yourself what or what you will not say» — effectively negated or interfered with Mr. Ekman's right to choose to remain silent or with his right to counsel.