This report explores
whether school characteristics influence student engagement of 15 - year - olds.
In Episode 6 of The Research Files, Teacher speaks to Sandra Pattison and Tham Lu about an NCVER report that explores
whether school characteristics influence student engagement of 15 - year - olds.
Not exact matches
A newly published research study conducted by graduate students Jessie Green and Alan Brown under the guidance of Punam Ohri - Vachaspati, a nutrition researcher at the
School of Nutrition and Health Promotion at Arizona State University, examined
whether noticing and using calorie menu labels was associated with demographic
characteristics of customers at a national fast food chain currently posting calorie counts.
The findings held true for all students, regardless of
whether they appeared likely or unlikely to attend selective
schools, as predicted by student background
characteristics such as race, gender, socioeconomic status, and pre-college test scores.
Teachers decide
whether to remain at a
school for a multiplicity of reasons, which can be divided into four main categories: 1)
characteristics of the job, including salary and working conditions; 2) alternative job opportunities; 3) teachers» own job and family preferences; and 4)
school districts» personnel policies.
Whether these
characteristics directly affect teachers» decisionmaking or indicate other less tangible factors (such as the disciplinary climate or bureaucratic environment at the
school) can not be determined.
First, we use our entire sample to analyze the extent to which the
schools that students attend can explain the overall variation in student test scores and fluid cognitive skills, controlling for differences in prior achievement and student demographic
characteristics (including gender, age, race / ethnicity, and
whether the student is from a low - income family, is an English language learner, or is enrolled in special education).
The author adds, «
School practices to encourage parents to participate in their children's education are more important than family
characteristics like parental education, family size, marital status, socioeconomic level, or student grade level in determining
whether parents get involved.»
Parents have exercised choice in selecting a charter or private - sector
school rather than a district
school, making it impossible to say
whether parental perceptions of the
school are caused by actual
school characteristics in each sector or some other factor.
The significance of the coefficients on the private - and district -
school indicators allows us to test
whether there is a statistically significant difference between charter -
school parents and parents from either of the other sectors, after adjusting for differences in the observable background
characteristics of the parents they serve.
If spending is not strongly influenced by observable
school characteristics, we have to question
whether it is driven by a district strategy at all.
The
school characteristics include
whether it is in an urban area, grade level (e.g., high
school), the number of students enrolled, student - teacher ratio, the percentage of students who are eligible for the free or reduced - price lunch program, the percentage of minority students, and measures of student achievement in reading and math.
He uses this information to estimate the relationship between four parental
characteristics (ethnic background, educational attainment,
whether both parents are in the home, and mother's employment status) and
whether the parent is choosing the child's
school.
For this analysis,
school characteristics taken into account include national percentile test rank, the proportion of students eligible for a free lunch,
whether the
school is secular or religious, and the local education authority in which it is located.
I then examine
whether these survey measures, which are not observed by the inspectors, are higher in
schools that received better inspection ratings, controlling for various
characteristics of the
schools and survey respondents.
These results, however, still do not account for differences in the backgrounds and
characteristics of students who attend these types of
schools that might in turn affect
whether they engage in community service.
Remember that my test for
whether school choice raises demand for certain teacher
characteristics is two-fold: 1)
whether a
school that faces stronger competition hires teachers with more of a certain
characteristic; and 2)
whether that
characteristic earns a premium in an environment of greater
school choice.
As a first test for nonrandom selection of students into or out of particular
schools and cohorts of students, we examined
whether peer family violence appears to have an effect on cohort size or student
characteristics such as race, gender, and income.
We examined
whether larger networks are more effective than smaller ones and found that, both with and without correcting for student and peer socioeconomic
characteristics and selection bias, students at
schools that are part of networks of three or more
schools consistently outperform students at
schools in networks of only two
schools.
That is, we compare students with the same demographic
characteristics, the same test scores in the current year and in a previous year, the same responses to the surveys for other social - emotional measures collected by the district, and within the same
school and grade, to see
whether students who look the same on all of these measures but have a stronger growth mindset learn more over the course of the following year.
We also confirm that we obtain similar results when we control for student
characteristics measured at or before the PSAT / NMSQT, including sex, parental education, family income level,
whether a student took the PSAT / NMSQT in 10th grade and his or her previous score, indicators for ethnic background (for example, Mexican, Cuban), and controls for the type of high
school attended, including affiliation (public or private), urbanicity (that is, city, suburban, rural), size, and concentration of Hispanic students.
We also were able to obtain from PISA student reports of their background
characteristics and administrator reports on the
characteristics of each student's
school, including such things as
school resources and
whether the
school was public or private.
These
characteristics include, in addition to a variety of measures of student achievement as of 1996, the percentages of students in the
school that are eligible for free
school meals, those who are nonwhite, and those with special educational needs; the pupil - teacher ratio and the number of students enrolled;
whether the
school is all girls, all boys, a religious
school, or in London; and several measures of the qualifications of the teaching staff.
They also used PISA data on students» background and the
characteristics of each student's
school, including resource levels and
whether the
school is public or private.
Using data from the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002, this study examines
whether teachers disproportionally perceive minority students as having a disability even after accounting for student background, teacher traits, and
school characteristics.
We examine
whether race - match effects vary based on a range of other student and
school characteristics.
Abdulkadiroglu et al. (2011) and Angrist, Pathak, and Walters (2013) found similar estimates of the impact of a year in a Boston area charter
school whether they compared charter
school admission lottery winners and losers or
whether they compared charter attendees to regular public
school students with similar observed
characteristics.
Second, we examine
whether the size of the drop in relative achievement suffered by students entering middle
school in grade 6 varied with the
characteristics of the middle
school they attended.
Policymakers should also consider
whether altering the structural
characteristics of
schools — reconfiguring large middle
schools as smaller K - 8
school, for example — may prove helpful in reducing suspensions.
Other
school characteristics associated with better student achievement included: more time spent on English instruction; teacher pay plans that were based on teachers» effectiveness at improving student achievement, principals» evaluations, or
whether teachers took on additional duties, rather than traditional pay scales; an emphasis on academics in
schools» mission statements; and a classroom policy of punishing or rewarding the smallest of student infractions.
I recently collaborated with Jay Greene, head of the Department of Education Reform at the University of Arkansas, to observe
whether private
school - educated adults are likely to espouse anti-Semitic beliefs after controlling for a variety of background
characteristics.
This paper focused on
whether the use of online discussion boards can enhance the quality of interaction in the middle and high
school English classroom, covering both the
characteristics of online discussion boards and potential negative effects of their features.
This exploratory study examined the extent to which the reform processes of the
schools reflected
characteristics and strategies found in the research,
whether schools improving at different rates differed in systematic ways, and the most significant challenges faced in both securing and sustaining dramatic
school improvements.
Project Appleseed believes
whether parents live in a
school district that offers
school choice, are changing residences, or have a child entering kindergarten, choosing a
school is a complex decision that includes the
characteristics of the child, family, and
schools.
The process can include assessing
whether certain
characteristics — such as the qualifications of teachers or counselor - student ratios — can explain some of the differences in the number of advanced courses
schools offer.
It should also differentiate charter
schools according to
whether they operate as autonomous LEAs or part of an existing, traditional LEA as this
characteristic greatly influences provision of special education and related services.
Now that we have established that boundary participation rates are different across the city in ways that systematically change with neighborhood
characteristics, we can test
whether differences in neighborhood
characteristics can explain
school choice behaviors across the city.
That treasure trove of information enabled the consortium to determine with a high degree of reliability the organizational
characteristics and practices that predict
whether a
school is likely to produce above - average improvement in student outcomes.
Personal
characteristics may have a significant impact on how individuals fit in a particular environment and, thus,
whether or not they ultimately stay in a challenging profession like K - 12 education, especially within
schools that are making intensive efforts to meet 21st - century learning requirements involving technology.
My Assumptions I set out, assuming that five factors are most important in determining student achievement.They are: 1)
whether or not a student attends a choice
school, 2) students» demographic
characteristics, 3) students» motivation, 4) a student's parental
characteristics, and 5) a students teacher
characteristics.
The report raises the key question of
whether district - level effects are attributable to district
characteristics that include, but are not limited to, the make - up and reform orientation of the
school board.
When asked by Justice Russell Brown
whether law
school tuition fees were a discriminatory barrier to entry, the AG's counsel stated that while tuition does not engage an immutable personal
characteristic like sexual orientation, «[t] here may well be an argument in a different case that an accredited law
school may not set their fees so prohibitively high... so as to curtail the [admission] of meritorious candidates.»
Although the results from the present study may not be conclusive on
whether children who participate in ECE have better learning outcomes due to lack of robust longitudinal support, it is undeniable that stimulation of child
characteristics that are targeted to reduce educational inequalities at
school entry between advantaged and disadvantaged children represents a critical foundation in reducing the economic, health, and social burdens associated with poverty.
A range of childhood psychosocial risk factors have been associated with depression, including
characteristics of the child (eg, behavioral and socioemotional problems, poor
school performance),
characteristics of the parents (eg, parent psychopathology, rejecting or intrusive behavior), and family circumstances (eg, the loss of a parent, physical or sexual violence, family discord).12 - 15 However, it has not been shown decisively
whether these risks distinguish juvenile from adult - onset MDD.