Not exact matches
As an analytical tool they can be used to assess
whether a currency is looking stretched
vs its longer
term trend (for trending currencies) or
vs its long
term average (for mean reverting currencies).
There are often conversations here about the differences in nature
vs nurture in the behavior of animals — but clearly nurture plays a pretty important role in overall behavior when the gender of the owner and the act of
whether or not a dog is on a leash can play an instrumental role in a dog's behavior — because those are very short
term, environmental conditions.
I think in
terms of
whether you'd prefer CX first
vs CX business it would entirely depend upon how you feel about the added frills.
So... Let us first start off with saying that, without knowing more about your situation, it would be impossible for us to say
whether or not you made a mistake getting
term vs whole life insurance.
Instead, you have to choose a policy that is right for you,
whether it be
term life
vs whole life insurance.
Whether you choose
term life
vs permanent life insurance, it is important to understand the differences, with one major difference being the initial cost.
There seems to be an ongoing battle surrounding the cost of whole life insurance
vs term life insurance costs —
whether you are 30 and looking for insurance, or even if you are 50 years old and need life insurance!
Long -
term disability
vs short -
term disability explained Long
term disability and short
term disability explained: what it is, how it works, and
whether you need it.
● A considerable gender divide, as nearly 30 percent of men surveyed currently or have previously owned a cryptocurrency, as opposed to just 13 percent of women ● A remarkably close alignment between those who identify as «millenials» and those who identify as «household decision makers» in
terms of cryptocurrency ownership (22 percent
vs 19 percent),
whether they'd be tempted to buy cryptocurrencies in the future (56 percent
vs 55 percent) and
whether cryptocurrencies will be widely accepted by 2025 (56 percent
vs 55 percent).
Subgroup analyses: We will examine
whether there is evidence that the intervention effect is modified for subgroups within the trial participants using tests of interaction between intervention and child and family factors as follows: parity (first - born
vs other), antenatal risks (2
vs 3 or more risk factors at screening), maternal mental health at baseline (high
vs low score) 18, 62, 63 and self - efficacy at baseline (poor
vs normal mastery) 35 using the regression models described above with additional
terms for interaction between subgroup and trial arm.