Sentences with phrase «whether the charter applied»

The contentious issue was whether the Charter applied in such a case.

The Legal Battle Over The World's Oldest Profession Compared to Kyle Freeman, Terri - Jean Bedford faces no threshold questions about whether the Charter applies to her case.

Not exact matches

While parents may confer with a child - study team when considering enrolling in a charter school, the choice of whether or not to apply to enroll is the parents» alone, not a matter delegated to the child - study team.

The universal enrollment system was rolled out under the district's former schools chief to create a central hub for students to apply for and rank their schools of choice, whether traditional or charter.

This attempt to turn around an existing large and troubled school was unlike anything it had attempted before, marking the first true test of whether a charter's formula for success might be applied to regular public schools.

If you live in or near one of these 12 school districts, and all of the 12 districts formally apply for and receive charter granting authority from the State Board of Education later this year, you will need to decide whether to submit your charter school application to your local school district, or to the new Washington Charter School Commcharter granting authority from the State Board of Education later this year, you will need to decide whether to submit your charter school application to your local school district, or to the new Washington Charter School Commcharter school application to your local school district, or to the new Washington Charter School CommCharter School Commission.

I've always applied my test in equal measure whether the school is a traditional public school, a charter school, a parochial school, a private school, or even a home school.

Mayors understand the communities that charters serve, and that local context helps them determine whether a team of educators and community leaders applying for a charter can work effectively with parents and teachers.

The conflict - of - interest issues related to the central - office employees don't apply to principals because they wouldn't be involved in the district's recommendation on whether to award a charter.

Audubon Charter will have a third page asking parents whether they are applying to the school's French or Montessori programs, and the International School will ask parents about their child's foreign - language background.

But its questions indicate some key priorities, asking whether candidates support changing the formula for funding schools, limiting charter - school expansion or applying a conflict - of - interest law that school boards must follow to charters, which are now exempt.

Learn whether the annual March 1st School Safety Plan adoption requirements included in Education Code Section 32286 applies to charter schools.

Applying through Teachers for NYC Charter Schools is the best way to find the school community that's right for you, whether you have teaching experience, are embarking on your first job, or are making a career change and want to teach while working towards your certification.

Researchers have also tested whether applying strategies that are frequently used in the most effective charter schools can boost performance in traditional public schools — and the evidence suggests it can.

«The regulations prescribe a specific, transparent method for deriving the ADA / classroom ratio to be applied in allocating classrooms to charter schools, thereby allowing charter schools and the public to readily verify whether a district has complied with the regulation.

In a nutshell, the AG found that, when third country nationals apply for a visa with limited territorial validity («LTV») under Article 25 of the Visa Code with the aim of applying for international protection once they have arrived in a Member State's territory, the Member State's immigration authority should take the circumstances of the applicant into account and assess whether a refusal would lead to an infringement of the applicant's rights as protected by the Charter of Fundamental Rights.

Administrative decision - makers must apply Charter values: The court decided that the normal method of determining whether a law infringing a right or freedom is justifiable, the Oakes test, does not replace the administrative law framework.

29 That said, where a court of a Member State is called upon to review whether fundamental rights are complied with by a national provision or measure which, in a situation where action of the Member States is not entirely determined by European Union law, implements the latter for the purposes of Article 51 (1) of the Charter, national authorities and courts remain free to apply national standards of protection of fundamental rights, provided that the level of protection provided for by the Charter, as interpreted by the Court, and the primacy, unity and effectiveness of European Union law are not thereby compromised (see, in relation to the latter aspect, Case C - 399 / 11 Melloni [2013] ECR I - 0000, paragraph 60).

That decision provides guidance on how to determine whether administrative decision makers have properly exercised their statutory discretion in accordance with the Charter, emphasizing that «the protection of Charter guarantees is a fundamental and pervasive obligation, no matter which adjudicative forum is applying it»: [4].

The court challenge centres on the B.C. minister of Advanced Education's consideration of whether the Charter of Rights and Freedoms applied to the decision to approve the law school.

By contrast, whether the Charter also applies to the national rules determining under what conditions police and judicial authorities can access the retained data is less obvious, because Directive 2002 / 58 / EC does not cover «activities of the State in areas of criminal law» (Art. 1 (3)-RRB-.

First, whether the workers» right to information and consultation within the undertaking as enshrined in Article 27 of the Charter and implemented through Directive 2002/14 establishing a framework for informing and consulting employees in the Union can be applied in a legal dispute between two private parties, i.e. on its potential horizontal effect.

In these cases, even if the protection against self - incrimination in section 13 of the Charter applies — which provides that «A witness who testifies in any proceedings has the right not to have any incriminating evidence so given used to incriminate that witness in any other proceedings, except in a prosecution for perjury or for the giving of contradictory evidence» — the SKCA held that prior false statements are admissible where the deceit is the substance of the offence, regardless of whether it was «incriminating evidence» or related to «perjury or for the giving of contradictory evidence» (Staranchuk SKCA at para 5).

«The criterion which must be applied in order to determine whether a punishment is cruel and unusual within the meaning of s. 12 of the Charter is, to use the words of Laskin C.J. in Miller and Cockriell, supra, at p. 688, «whether the punishment prescribed is so excessive as to outrage standards of decency.»

One may already stop here to wonder whether the EFTA Court is not making its life too easy speaking of an interpretation of EEA law «in the light» of fundamental rights in the present case; a more thorough reasoning would have had to grapple with the scope of EEA law in the case: Only if Iceland was acting effectively within the scope of EEA law here the fundamental rights standards of EEA law apply under the EFTA Court's supervision; otherwise one could argue that the Supreme Court of Iceland's action ought to be judged against the benchmark of domestic fundamental rights and ECHR standards (compare the rich debate on the parallel problem in EU law which focuses on Article 51 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights).

The Supreme Court now uses the case to make decisions on Charter rulings, applying a process of legal reasoning called the «Oakes test» to decide whether laws should be overridden.

On February 1, 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada held that the Quebec's workers» compensation board and tribunal must apply the Quebec Charter of human rights and freedoms when determining whether a return to work is possible under Quebec's workers» compensation scheme.

80 However, in the course of such an examination and when determining in particular whether the conditions laid down in Article 7 (1) of Directive 2003/86 are satisfied, the provisions of that directive must be interpreted and applied in the light of Articles 7 and 24 (2) and (3) of the Charter, as is moreover apparent from recital 2 in the preamble to and Article 5 (5) of that directive, which require the Member States to examine the applications for reunification in question in the interests of the children concerned and with a view to promoting family life.

The CLP was to apply the Charter reasonably and follow the approach imposed by the courts to determine whether the employer had discriminated against the employee based on disability and breached his right to return to work in a suitable position due to a violation of the Charter.

This section shall apply to every city and town, whether or not it has adopted a charter pursuant to section three.