Sentences with phrase «which hebrew»

Brueggemann refers to a third option as a «seriatim reading,» by which Hebrew texts are read one at a time without reference to the other The result is a variegated pluralism devoid of dialogue and critical engagement.

The setting in which the Bible was written: It is necessary to take a glance at the kind of world — physical, psychological, and social — in which the Hebrew people lived.

Previously, we learned that Moses did not intend to write a scientific explanation of how the sun, moon, and stars came into existence, but instead wanted the Hebrew people to understand how Yahweh was different and better than the gods of Canaan, Egypt, and Babylon, with which the Hebrew people were familiar.

This is not to disparage a tradition of poetry which as far back as Sumerian times possessed form and power and in the hands of Israel's immediate predecessors produced models from which the Hebrew poets could work.

The universality of the human regard for those higher qualities which the Hebrew gathered up in the concept of righteousness found rational explanation best in a cosmic origin which some modern thinkers describe as a Process; but, for the Hebrew mind, that Process was personal.

Israel's sense of the wonder of nature as interfused with a presence is well illustrated in a passage that portrays the might and majesty of the sea, that enemy on which the Hebrew characteristically looked with suspicion and fear, but which is here sublimated into an expression of the power of God:

Along with a notable repertoire of minor, but rich, devices — assonances, alliteration, punning, chiasmus, various figures of speech — these were the tools with which the Hebrew poet worked.

Since these forces are themselves fundamentally impersonal, their resultant in feeling and action can not be a person in the sense in which Hebrew man came to understand himself.

The church attained an understanding of the work of the Holy Spirit in which the Hebrew axial achievement was affirmed and carried farther.

To do this, it will be necessary to take a glance at the kind of world — physical, psychological, and social — in which the Hebrew people lived.

= > We have the Word of God which the Hebrew were tasked with bringing this light to the people.

Ancient Egyptians and Sumerians and others who came before the Hebrews had lots of medical treatments and scientific observations which the Hebrews undoubtedly drew from; but those cultures also were given to many superst «itious beliefs.

The journey which the Hebrews traveled by means of this word, as they pushed out its significance like an advancing roadway, could not have been foreseen but in retrospect it is clear.

I agree that the creation account is a piece of literature / theology which is couched in language which the Hebrews could understand but to put it on the level of a completely imaginary fairy tale like Cinderella creates problems because we cant formulate doctrine on the basis of fairy tales.

-- It says «circle», not globe, sphere or ball, for which the Hebrews did have words — they did not use those words to describe the Earth.

LinCA I like your shoe box it reminds me of the ark which the Hebrews dragged about through the desert.

It was the means by which the Hebrews reminded themselves of the holiness of time, all time.

There you will find in the end the same general picture of the universe which the Hebrews held, but their fellow Semites in Babylonia got at it by having the god, Marduk, slit his enemy, Tiamat, in two, like a flat fish, and then use the upper half to make the sky and the lower half to make the earth.

Not exact matches

Digging a bit into the details, Reuters said that the malware worked with a feature of Telegram that lets the messaging software recognize text that is read right to left, which includes Arabic and Hebrew.

«There is a very important Jewish value — called «tikkun olam» in Hebrew, which means «repairing the world,»» he said.

It is «GeHenna» that is mentioned in the NT, not «Hell» (which doesn't appear in the original Hebrew of the «Old» Testament / Tanach either).

And he could have had hebrew script written on it which was unknown to anyone in that part of the world.

Accounts of 22 famous contemporary historians with references to the person of Jesus Christ; Cornelius Tacitus (Roman A.D. 60) Thallus (Roman A.D. 52) Mara Bar Seraphian (Hebrew A.D. 73) Lucian of Samosata (Greek A.D. 125) Flavius Josephus (Hebrew A.D. 37) Suetonius (Roman A.D. 120) Plinius Secundus (Roman A.D. 112) Tertullian (Roman A.D. 175) Pontius Pilate (Roman A.D. 33) Justin Martyr (Roman A.D. 150); Jesus is also mentioned in the Jewish Talmud (work finished cir 500 AD) which incorporates the Mishna completed in cir 200 AD.

As to those who reject God (the foreign nations around the Hebrew from which they could buy slaves) what is sin to them.

Dawkins has taken the God of the Hebrew as they knew God and characterized God in their written book and made up his own version of God which just happens to be your version.

What we are getting is the attempt to express the Hebrew thought in the Greek language and Greek thought which is totally different from the Hebrew.

In a future article, Inshallah, I will go in to more details about the various tribes, their languages; in which some are influenced by Arabic, Persian, Hebrew words.

The book we know as Genesis is a Jewish scripture, written in Hebrew, in which God says, «מה - רזאת עשית ותאמר».

Any one who knows the long and convoluted, very human process of the integration of the «Yahweh» god, (the god of the armies), into Hebrew culture, could never for a moment take it seriously, as well as the development of the major tenets of Christianity, most of which were not spoken of by the so - called «founder» of that religion, (but instead were developed by his followers), many years later, including the long, and very interesting concoctions of his cult.

it is only useful as a history of the hebrews, (old testament) when taken in context with the writings of the other early civilizations in the middle east some of which have only recently been deciphered.

This contradiction is irreconcilable until one realizes that the Hebrews probably adopted their devil from the Persians and so, evil acts which were once attributed to Yahweh, were now being rewritten and passed off as the devil's handiwork.

Fulfillment: John 19:17 They took Jesus therefore, and He went out, bearing His own cross, to the place called the Place of a Skull, which is called in Hebrew, Golgotha.

* Hebrews 7:2 To whom also Abraham gave a tenth part of all; first being by interpretation King of righteousness, and after that also King of Salem, which is, King of peace; * Zephaniah 2:3 Seek ye the Lord, all ye meek of the earth, which have wrought his judgment; seek righteousness, seek meekness: it may be ye shall be hid in the day of the Lord's anger.

The hebrew war god which later took meds and turned into the christian «peace» god which then will stop taking meds and launch an attack from atop his magical unicorn claimed in Exodus 12:12 that it will punish all of the Egyption gods (and at the same time it'll end the lives of babies).

Nevertheless, the recognition of the similarity of the problematic, coming as it does out of that which both communities accept as Sacred Scripture — the Hebrew Bible — can lead to a new mutuality.

The Bible (OT) is a book which includes * some * history of primitive Hebrew culture, and * some * good advice for practical, beneficial human behavior, but mostly it is a compilation of ancient Middle Eastern historical fiction, myth, legend, superst.ition and fantasy.

And using the Hebrew Bible as a weapon to justify your views is a double slap in the face; I pray you learn some empathy, of which, for all of your words and apparent knowledge, you seemed never to have grasped.

Just as Martin Luther, the founder of Protestant Christianity misinterpreted the Bible to suit his own hate - filled and anti-Semitic ideology; Christianity today misinterprets the Hebrew Scriptures and prophecies in order to prove the existence of a dying and resurrected Jewish Messiah which has no basis in Jewish scripture.

The Hebrew word for «strong drink,» shakar, refers to fermented barley, which is why some translations call it «beer.»

To further damage your credibility, you added that the Bible was written in Hebrew, Greek and Latin... which is also erroneous, as the Bible was written in Hebrew, Greek, and a very small part from Aramaic sources.

In which tetragrammaton (Hebrew word meaning Yahweh [a singular god]-RRB- creates the garden of eden in the east, and creates a man in his own image and places him there, etc, etc..

Let's start at the very beginning which is to explain that I am an Orthodox Jew who has grown up learning the Bible in Hebrew, as well as the Oral Code of Law (essentially the Mishnah and the Talmud), and who has studied in multiple Yeshivot (Jewish Seminaries).

In Hebrew, when the text talks about the voice that tells Abraham to take his son, it is ha'elohim (which could be translated, «the gods»).

And wasn't the King James version merely a translation from Latin which had earlier been translated from Greek, Hebrew or Aramaic?

If the Father is Elohim and Jesus is Jehovah (as Mormons teach), how does a Mormon explain Deuteronomy 6:4, which in the Hebrew says, «Hear, O Israel: Jehovah our Elohim is one Jehovah»?

There are a couple problems with this prophecy... First, virgin in this verse is a mistranslation of the Hebrew word «almah», which actually means «young woman».

In the original Hebrew manuscripts from which we get our King James Old Testament there were no breaks between certain books such as 1st and 2nd Samuel..., and Ezra and Nehemiah are rendered as one book, but the content is the same, only a different number of the same books.

The Old Testament, in its Hebrew and Greek versions, wasn't included, nor were the later chapter and verse divisions (those came in the thirteenth and sixteenth centuries respectively), which makes these earliest codices similar, in some ways, to what Green's Bibliotheca project is attempting.

The OT Hebrews recognized that God was essentially unknowable, which is why they could not name [define] God as we can most creaturely things.

For those seeking more accuracy, read the New American Standard Bible which is a transliteration of the Bible from the Greek and Hebrew.