Sentences with phrase «which appealed against decisions»

Not exact matches

Nicola Sturgeon was speaking at First Ministers Questions after judges found in favour of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde which was appealing against a decision of the Court of Session in Edinburgh last year in the case of Mary Doogan and Connie Wood.

This became painfully clear in 1996 when the Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal of the Alaska Supreme Court's Swanner decision, which held that the state's interest in preventing discrimination against unmarried heterosexual couples is sufficiently great that it trumps the objections of landlords who believe they are forbidden by God to permit «fornication» on their property.

The ACCC today filed a Notice of Appeal from the Federal Court's decision dismissing the ACCC's proceedings against the Australian Egg Corporation Ltd and others, which commenced in May 2014.

I will refer in particular to three criticisms highlighted in the report: the slowness to remove foreign national prisoners from the UK, the concern with the high rate of appeals brought against UKBA's decisions which are decided against the Agency, and the large number of unresolved immigration cases still awaiting decision.

Reports made it appear like a political decision, but as I understand it now it's rather the executive which determined FARA applies for RT activities, a decision against which RT could but chose not to appeal in court?

The decision, against which the government will appeal, has prompted anger from some supporters of Brexit.

Money Laundering: Ex-Gov Sule Lamido's Son, Aminu Loses Appeal The Court of Appeal sitting in Kaduna on Monday, dismissed the appeal of Aminu Sule Lamido, the 34 year old son of former Jigawa State governor, Alhaji Sule Lamido, against the decision of the Federal High Court, Kano which found Appeal The Court of Appeal sitting in Kaduna on Monday, dismissed the appeal of Aminu Sule Lamido, the 34 year old son of former Jigawa State governor, Alhaji Sule Lamido, against the decision of the Federal High Court, Kano which found Appeal sitting in Kaduna on Monday, dismissed the appeal of Aminu Sule Lamido, the 34 year old son of former Jigawa State governor, Alhaji Sule Lamido, against the decision of the Federal High Court, Kano which found appeal of Aminu Sule Lamido, the 34 year old son of former Jigawa State governor, Alhaji Sule Lamido, against the decision of the Federal High Court, Kano which found him...

Aminu Sule Lamido, the 34 year old son of former Jigawa State governor, Alhaji Sule Lamido, had his appeal struck out on Monday by an appellate court sitting in Kaduna against the decision of the Federal High Court, Kano which found him guilty of the charge of money laundering brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC.

Governor Abiola Ajimobi of Oyo State on Monday appealed against the decision of an Oyo State High Court siting in Ibadan which declared the review of...

The Prosecutor General appealed this decision to the Supreme Court, which dismissed the appeal in September 2000, bringing the criminal case against Nikitin to a close after five long years.

The dispute involved an appeal to the U.S. District Court by Asterias Biotherapeutics, Inc., (as assignee of Geron Corporation), which sought to overturn both decisions by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) against Geron in its patent interferences.

While he was unsuccessful, Kohn's motion in no way impacted the decision or proceedings against Apple for its part in this issue; Apple is appealing its own ruling, handed down by Cote earlier this year in which she found sufficient evidence of price fixing on the part of the company.

You can appeal to the court against their decision, but you must do this within 28 days of getting this notice which confirms the adjudicator's original decision.

The United States Court of Appeal has ruled against Silicon Knights» appeal of a lower court decision which awarded a total of $ 9.2 m in damages and legal fees to Epic Appeal has ruled against Silicon Knights» appeal of a lower court decision which awarded a total of $ 9.2 m in damages and legal fees to Epic appeal of a lower court decision which awarded a total of $ 9.2 m in damages and legal fees to Epic Games.

In that case, the Supreme Court will be considering the controversial decision of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled that the Alien Tort Statute (which allows lawsuits in U.S. courts for violations of international law) does not create a legal basis for such suits against corporations.

The Campaign Against the Arms Trade, which initiated the claims regarding the UK government's alleged contravention of humanitarian law, will now appeal against the High Court's deAgainst the Arms Trade, which initiated the claims regarding the UK government's alleged contravention of humanitarian law, will now appeal against the High Court's deagainst the High Court's decision.

After an Odyssey of nearly 10 years, the legal proceedings of Switzerland against German restrictions on flights to and from Zurich airport have come to an end: The CJEU, in its judgement delivered on 7 March 2013 (Case C ‑ 547 / 10 P), has rejected Switzerland's appeal against the judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 (Case T ‑ 319 / 05), by which the General Court had rejected Switzerland «s action for annulment against Commission Decision 2004 / 12 / EC of 5 December 2003 (OJ 2004 L 4, p. 13), thus allowing Germany to continue to apply unilateral restrictions on flights to and from Zurich airport over German territory.

The problem is easily illustrated by SW v RC [2008] EWHC 73 (Fam), where Mr Justice Singer contrasted the meanings of 14 days from «the determination against which the appeal» (in FPR 1991 r 4.22 (3): Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989), Sch 1 proceedings) as against from «the date of the order or decision appealed against» in r 8.1 (4)(ancillary relief proceedings); and what for this purpose, he asked, «constitutes a «determination», and an «order or decision»?»

Less than a week later, they are served with a negative decision from the Belgian authorities, against which they appeal.

When the Commission issues a decision against a given party, such party has at its disposal the complete system of judicial review provided by EU law, which includes the action for annulment at the General Court and the appeal to the CJEU.

Following the release of the appeal court's decision, the LSUC brought professional misconduct proceedings against Groia, which were stayed pending the outcome of the OSC prosecution.

the decision by the HCA was partially reversed and then restored upon appeal, against which Allianz appealed to the Hungarian Supreme Court.

Appeals in family proceedings (including child support and certain other family related cases) against decisions of magistrates» courts which are initiated on or after 6 April 2009 will go to the county court instead of the High Court.

The US government appealed against Judge Coleman's decision, but today it was upheld by the High Court, which gave the US authorities a deadline to assure the court that, if Giese was found guilty, «there will be no attempt to make him the subject of a civil commitment order».

«TCC claims 2.1 The following are examples of the types of claim which it may be appropriate to bring as TCC claims --(a) building or other construction disputes, including claims for the enforcement of the decisions of adjudicators under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996; (b) engineering disputes; (c) claims by and against engineers, architects, surveyors, accountants and other specialised advisers relating to the services they provide; (d) claims by and against local authorities relating to their statutory duties concerning the development of land or the construction of buildings; (e) claims relating to the design, supply and installation of computers, computer software and related network systems; (f) claims relating to the quality of goods sold or hired, and work done, materials supplied or services rendered; (g) claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant; (h) claims between neighbours, owners and occupiers of land in trespass, nuisance etc; (i) claims relating to the environment (for example, pollution cases); (j) claims arising out of fires; (k) claims involving taking of accounts where these are complicated; and (l) challenges to decisions of arbitrators in construction and engineering disputes including applications for permission to appeal and appeals.»

«In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court this week allowed the appeal of Times Newspapers Limited against a decision of the Court of Appeal which had held that held that it could not rely on Reynolds qualified privilege...&appeal of Times Newspapers Limited against a decision of the Court of Appeal which had held that held that it could not rely on Reynolds qualified privilege...&Appeal which had held that held that it could not rely on Reynolds qualified privilege...»

That was the main argument made by France Télécom and Orange Caraïbe when they appealed against a decision of the French competition authority which had fined them for abusing their dominant positions.

Michael Cernovich just blogged a decision by the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upholding (part of) a district court's decision in Carhart v. Gonzales, in which the plaintiffs sought an injunction against the enforcement of the so - called Partial - Birth Abortion Act of 2003.

That is not a problem because the Supreme Court's mandate, having granted leave, is to make the decision that ought to have been made by the lower court from which the appeal comes; or order a new trial if that is the proper decision (if the decision appealed from was «against the weight of the evidence); or remand the appeal or any part of the appeal to the court appealed from for additional consideration in accordance with the direction of the Court: the Supreme Court of Canada Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. S - 26, ss.

Along these lines, it is reasonable to suggest that the Court of Appeal's decision to state explicitly that which was not at issue before it, including «whether the pleading against the defendant Alberta could be struck as being frivolous or vexatious» (Ernst v. Alberta at para 9), reflects judicial scepticism.

The Court of Appeal has upheld the High Court's landmark 2014 decisions in Cartier [1] to grant an injunction against internet service providers which required them to block access to certain websites which sell counterfeit goods.

In Canada (Attorney General) v. Hicks, 2015 FC 599 (CanLII) the Federal Court heard an appeal concerning the validity of a Canadian Human Rights Tribunal («CHRT») decision which held that the Human Resources and Skills Development Canada («HRSDC») discriminated against its employee on the basis of family status.

He served as the expert witness in immigration law in the landmark California Appeals Court case of People v. Bautista (2004) 115 Cal.App.4 th 229, which held that failure to defend against an aggravated felony can be ineffective assistance of counsel, and he was counsel in several key published decisions on crim / imm in the Ninth Circuit.

In a case decided in February 2016, Wolinsky v. Assiniboine Credit Union, Stuart Blake and Andrew Loewen convinced the Manitoba Court of Appeal to overturn a decision granting the plaintiffs leave to commence an action against the defendant which was otherwise commenced out of time, on the basis that the lower court committed several errors.

In June of this year, the Ontario Court of Appeal released an important decision clarifying the circumstances in which a court will award costs personally against a lawyer.

A firm of accountants appealed against a decision of the Court of Appeal in which it was decided that the accountants owed a duty of care to the appellant shareholders when producing an audit report required by statute.

She also successfully represented a client against a consumer group's claim which appealed a Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection decision to allow dentists to use mercury fillings.

Apart from the proceedings of the CJC against Justice Camp, his decision was reversed on appeal, with the Alberta Court of Appeal stating that, «We are also persuaded that sexual stereotypes and stereotypical myths, which have long since been discredited, may have found their way into the trial judge's judgment»: R v. Wagar, 2015 ABCA 327 at paappeal, with the Alberta Court of Appeal stating that, «We are also persuaded that sexual stereotypes and stereotypical myths, which have long since been discredited, may have found their way into the trial judge's judgment»: R v. Wagar, 2015 ABCA 327 at paAppeal stating that, «We are also persuaded that sexual stereotypes and stereotypical myths, which have long since been discredited, may have found their way into the trial judge's judgment»: R v. Wagar, 2015 ABCA 327 at para. 4.

The Deliveroo decision comes hard on the heels of the latest decision against Uber which lost its appeal against an Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruling: that its drivers should be classified as workers with rights, such as holiday pay and a minimum wage, rather than being self - empappeal against an Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruling: that its drivers should be classified as workers with rights, such as holiday pay and a minimum wage, rather than being self - empAppeal Tribunal (EAT) ruling: that its drivers should be classified as workers with rights, such as holiday pay and a minimum wage, rather than being self - employed.

The landlord should also set out «the way in which a tenant... may appeal... against a decision not to grant another tenancy on the expiry of the fixed - term» (Tenancy Standard, para 2.1.6).

However, the court allowed the charity to appeal against the Commission's decision and set out principles by which the Commission should consider Catholic Care's case.

As regards the categories of dispute for which legal aid is not provided, they may be commercial or fiscal disputes (Bulgaria), slander or libel cases, cases involving land or electoral disputes (Ireland), questions of tax evasion or credit transfer (Italy), professional disputes (Luxembourg), or road traffic violations and appeals against decisions entailing only fines (Norway).

The regulations were enacted in response to the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in R. v. Parker (2000), 49 O.R. (3d) 481 (C.A.), in which the criminal prohibitions against possessing and cultivating marihuana were struck down (with the declaration of invalidity suspended for a period of twelve months) after they were found to contravene s. 7 of the Charter in the case of persons who required marihuana for medically approved uses.

In dismissing the appeal against dismissal of an application for judicial review of the Bar Council's decision, the Court examined the relevant ECHR case law, which emphasised adequacy of representation over freedom of choice as to the identity of counsel.

The case overturns a Court of Appeal ruling which allowed an appeal by AH, IG and NM against the decision of an asylum and immigration tribunal ordering their return to Appeal ruling which allowed an appeal by AH, IG and NM against the decision of an asylum and immigration tribunal ordering their return to appeal by AH, IG and NM against the decision of an asylum and immigration tribunal ordering their return to Sudan.

An analysis producing the result that the court did not have jurisdiction to hear the secretary of state's appeals would take the form: (i) the Social Security Act 1998 (SSA 1998), s 15 provided for an appeal against «any decision of a Commissioner»; (ii) the «decision» in each of the cases was to be found in para 1, dismissing the claimant's appeal; (iii) the secretary of state was not seeking to challenge that decision; (iv) by analogy with Lake v Lake [1955] 2 All ER 538, he had no right to challenge the reasoning on an issue upon which he was unsuccessful — jurisdiction — when the ultimate decision was wholly favourable to him.

He was also closely involved in the first appeals brought against decisions of the Office of Communications under the Communications Act 2003, which implements the EC Commission's new Electronic Communications Package.