Sentences with phrase «which child custody arrangement»

In a child custody battle, a judge will ask several questions to determine which child custody arrangement, sole or joint custody, will work best for the children involved.

Not exact matches

Shared parenting is simply a collaborative arrangement in which both parents share custody of their children.

The West Virginia courts prefer a joint custody arrangement which allows the child access to both parents.

Overview of joint custody, a relatively common arrangement for divorced or unmarried parents in which the child splits his or her time between the two parents» living quarters.

These custody arrangements are rare, and are usually limited to situations in which one parent has been deemed unfit or incapable of having any form of responsibility over a child — for example, due to drug addiction or evidence of child abuse.

The judge will ask a parent several questions during a child custody hearing to determine which custody arrangement serves the child's best interest.

Iowa law requires that the court must consider the best interest of the child and order a custody arrangement that will give the child the chance for maximum continuing physical and emotional contact with both parents after the parents have separated and dissolved the marriage, and which will encourage parents to share the rights and responsibilities of raising the child unless physical harm or significant emotional harm to the child, other children, or a parent is likely to occur.

In the past, true «joint physical custody» arrangements were more common, in which the child lived with each parent roughly half the time.

Providing your children with a stable, consistent environment in which to grow and learn is the goal of our work in creating the custody arrangement.

Divorce is an emotional experience which jeopardizes your financial future and likely involves serious issues, including child custody arrangements and evaluating the worth of your family business.

Kansas judges deciding custody cases must determine «legal custody,» which refers to the responsibility to make educational, medical and other major decisions for a child, and «physical custody,» meaning the child's living and visitation arrangement with the parents.

Physical custody, which means where children reside, may be an equal and shared physical custody arrangement where a child's time is evenly split between two homes, or an arrangement where the child resides with the primary custodial parent and the visitation schedule allows for parenting time with the non-custodial parent.

Ultimately, the court will make a decision, if the parents can not agree upon child custody arrangements, which are in the best interests of the children.

There are many situations under which agreed upon or mandated Child Custody Arrangements might change.

a. Those who are the subject of international parental disputes over custody or contact; b. Those who are the subject of international abduction (including in those states which are not able to join the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention); c. Those who are placed abroad in alternative care arrangements which do not come within the definition of adoption and are therefore outside the scope of the 1993 Hague Inter-country Adoption Convention; d. Those who are the subject of cross-border trafficking and other forms of exploitation, including sexual abuse; e. Those who are refugees or unaccompanied minors.

Virginia has adopted the best interests of the child standard, in which a judge examines how a proposed custody arrangement will affect a child's well - being.

Child support payments differ from case to case and depend upon a variety of factors, including the custody arrangements to which both parents have agreed.

The purpose of a child custody arrangement is to determine which rights each parent will have with respect to their children.

This custody arrangement has now continued from the time of the hearing (May 2015) until present, which is an additional twenty - nine months, amounting to a total of forty - three months or about three and a half years — close to half of Child's life.

[13] He considered (1) the existing shared parenting arrangement and the relationship between the children and Ms. G; (2) the existing shared parenting arrangement and the relationship between the children and Mr. S; (3) the desirability of maximizing contact between the children and both parents; (4) the views of the children, which had not been canvassed; (5) Ms. G's reason for moving; (6) the disruption to the children of a change in custody; (7) the disruption to the children consequent on removal from family, schools, and community; and (8) various other factors, such as Mr. S's economic stability, the importance of the paternal grandparents, the location of the proposed residence at Moyie Lake on a leased lot at an RV park, the girls» relationship with Mr. G and his children, and Ms. G's inflexibility.

Barring a successful appeal from the order of child custody and parenting arrangements a spouse seeking to vary an order must show a substantial change in the conditions means and circumstances of the parents or the child has occurred since the last Order which if known at the time of the last order would have led to a different result.

includ [e] the benefit of meaningful relationship with both parents, ascertainable views of the child, needs of the child, history of upbringing and care, religious, spiritual and linguistic needs, harm suffered or which the child is at risk of suffering, custody arrangements, capacity of applicants etc. [as well as considering] any family / domestic violence and its impact

Another important factor to the court in establishing most custody arrangements is which parent will be the most likely to see to it that the non-custodial parent remains a strong part of the child or children's lives.

Divorce mediation in which mediation for child custody is a topic provides an excellent setting where an open, productive, and facilitated discussion as to the best living arrangements for the children after the divorce can take place.

The two primary types of legal custody, which is determined either by agreement between parents or by order of a judge, are joint legal custody, which is an arrangement where both parents share the rights to make the major decisions for their child, and sole legal custody, which is when one parent can make these decisions without input from the other parent.

Sole legal custody is an arrangement in which one parent has sole authority to make decisions about the child, even though the parents may still share joint physical custody.

When parents can not agree, the court will decide which custody arrangement is in the best interests of the child.

Similarly, many custody arrangements contain paramour restrictions, which prevent both parents from having lovers in the house overnight when the children are visiting.

The first is a sole custody arrangement in which the child lives with the parent who has the responsibility for providing daily childcare and making decisions about the child's religion, schooling, and medical care.

With a joint custody arrangement, parents share legal custody, which means that both parents have the right to make decisions regarding the child's upbringing.

Temporary child support orders are usually accompanied by temporary custody and visitation orders, which formalize the custody and visitation arrangement.

It applies to the custody terms of your decree, describing the visitation arrangement that either you or your spouse will have with your children, depending on which of you is the non-custodial parent.

Possessory Conservatorship — In Texas, possessory conservatorship refers to the child custody arrangement in which one parent by agreement or by court order is given some rights in a child's upbringing, when the other parent is designated as sole managing conservator and has the primary responsibility for a child or children after a divorce.

Ohio courts generally prefer joint legal custody arrangements, in which parents share decision - making authority but one parent provides the child's primary place of residence.

While the courts» primary guideline in making their custody arrangement is the best interests of the child, the courts» priority is determining which parent is capable of providing what is best for the child and the practicality of joint custody.

Sole Managing Conservatorship — In Texas, sole managing conservatorship refers to the child custody arrangement in which one parent by agreement or by court order is given the sole rights, duties and privileges concerning a child or children after a divorce.

After the petition is filed, the couple may meet to negotiate a settlement agreement, which will provide how the property will be divided as well as spousal support, child support and child custody arrangement.

Shared custody usually refers to arrangements in which the children spend similar amounts of time with each parent.

Regardless of whether parents make their decisions independently or rely on therapists, custody evaluators, or judges for recommendations and decisions, statutory, historical, and cultural forces often determine which care arrangements are deemed to be in the children's best interests (Kelly, 1994).

The court will only modify a custody order upon a demonstration of a material change of circumstances, which means that the existing custodial arrangement is no longer in the best interests of the child, such as when a serious health problem prevents a parent from taking care of a child.

While this is more of a kidnapping case it can still happen in a joint custody arrangement in which the parent leaves the country with the child.

Child support is based predominantly on the incomes of the parents, the number and ages of the children, and the amount of time the children will be spending with each parent based on the parenting plan to which the parties have agreed (i.e., their consensual custody arrangement) or the parenting plan ordered by a judge).

Interestingly, Judge Baer noted that in a frequently - ordered arrangement in which the non-custodial parent exercised partial custody every weekend and four weeks during summer vacation, the non-custodial parent would spend 132 days with the children.

Therefore, before deciding to «fight» for custody, think long and hard of the many options that can be implemented in your case in establishing a parenting plan that allows your children to have maximum access to both parents (not necessarily a 50 - 50 arrangement, but rather one that allows both parents to be involved in an ongoing basis with the children) as such an arrangement has been shown to be better for the children's future emotional well - being than one in which one parent is shut out of the children's lives (something that is not going to happen even after a custody trial).

Divorce is a court process in which a judge dissolves the legal bonds of marriage and sets terms for the divorcing couple, such as child custody arrangements, property division and alimony.

In simplest of terms, joint physical custody is an arrangement in which both parents share equal rights in terms of time and contact with their children.

For other cases holding that proposed relocation requests which would result in the effective termination of a shared physical custodial arrangement should be treated as a modification of custody, see, e.g., Lewellyn v. Lewellyn, 351 Ark. 346, 93 S.W. 3d 681 (2002)(both mother and father petitioned for sole custody of children after mother's proposed relocation would make parties» shared physical custodial arrangement unworkable; court found that mother's relocation constituted material change of circumstances warranting award of sole custody to father, even though such a relocation would not be considered a material change in circumstances in a case that did not involve shared physical custody), and In re Marriage of Garst, 955 P. 2d 1056 (Colo..

Joint physical custody is an arrangement in which parents each have extended periods of time with the children.

The key standard for determining child custody arrangements is the best interests of the child, which includes many factors.

Sole custody is an arrangement in which one parent has sole decision - making authority and is the parent with whom the child lives.