Sentences with phrase «which child custody orders»

So, we covered the best interest factors in Arizona Revised Statute Section 25 - 403 the court must consider determining which child custody orders will be in the best interests of the children.

However, despite the court's best intentions, there are specific instances in which a child custody order may not fulfill your child's needs as it should.

Not exact matches

Among them are the rights to: bullet joint parenting; bullet joint adoption; bullet joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents); bullet status as next - of - kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent; bullet joint insurance policies for home, auto and health; bullet dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support; bullet immigration and residency for partners from other countries; bullet inheritance automatically in the absence of a will; bullet joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment; bullet inheritance of jointly - owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate); bullet benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare; bullet spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home; bullet veterans» discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns; bullet joint filing of customs claims when traveling; bullet wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children; bullet bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child; bullet decision - making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her; bullet crime victims» recovery benefits; bullet loss of consortium tort benefits; bullet domestic violence protection orders; bullet judicial protections and evidentiary immunity; bullet and more...

Parents who have joint custody should be sure to request a provision in the child custody order that specifies which parent has the right and the authority to obtain a passport for the child.

According to North Carolina child custody laws, if a military parent has sole or joint custody of a child and receives deployment papers that involve moving a substantial distance from the parent's home, a North Carolina family court will issue a temporary custody order of the child during the parent's absence, which shall end no later than 10 days following the parent's return.

In the event parents do not voluntarily submit a written parenting plan for custody, the Court may order each parent to submit a detailed parenting plan which shall delineate each parent's position with respect to the scheduling and allocation of rights and responsibilities that will best serve the interest of the minor child or children.

provides for funding to be distributed by the Administrative Office of the Courts «for the specific purpose of funding the parenting plan requirements pursuant to this part, through the divorcing parent education and mediation fund, which funding includes the costs of court - ordered mediation, parenting education programs and any related services to resolve family conflict in divorce, post-divorce, and other child custody matters.»

Iowa law requires that the court must consider the best interest of the child and order a custody arrangement that will give the child the chance for maximum continuing physical and emotional contact with both parents after the parents have separated and dissolved the marriage, and which will encourage parents to share the rights and responsibilities of raising the child unless physical harm or significant emotional harm to the child, other children, or a parent is likely to occur.

Here are some of the other crimes for which Oakland says it will no longer be sending officers to the location unless it is «in - progress or there is a suspect on - scene:» • Lost Property • Theft • Vandalism • Vehicle Burglary • Vehicle Tampering • Residential Burglary • Identity Theft • Annoying and Harassing Phone Calls • Barking Dog • Violation of a Restraining Order • Reporting a Runaway • Violation of a Court Order • Violation of a child custody order where one parent failed to return the child at a specified Order • Reporting a Runaway • Violation of a Court Order • Violation of a child custody order where one parent failed to return the child at a specified Order • Violation of a child custody order where one parent failed to return the child at a specified order where one parent failed to return the child at a specified time.

For a father who may want to be part of the child's life, the court can order visitation as well as rule on legal custody, which means the parent's right to make major life decisions on the child's behalf.

The parents claimed that s. 32 (6)(a) of the Children and Youth Care Protection Act, which prohibited the addition of conditions in continuous custody orders was contrary to the parents» rights under s. 7 of the...

Following a lengthy arbitration in which he determined that the mother had undertaken a campaign of parental alientation, the arbitrator awarded custody of the two sons to the father and ordered the father to attend a reunification program with the children.

Additionally, if the parents are having difficulty reaching an agreement, the court may order them to attend child custody mediation sessions, in which trained court personnel attempt to help them resolve any lingering issues.

(3) This section does not apply if, at the time of the commencement of the action in which the custody order is issued, the child's 2 residences were more than 100 miles apart.

(c) A change of the residence or the removal of a child as described in subsection (a) may be considered a material change of circumstances which justifies modification of a prior order of legal custody, residency, child support or parenting time.

In order to modify a custody order, a person must show a change in circumstances since the last order was made, and that that change creates a situation in which modifying the order will be in the child or children's best interests.

In evaluating the best interests of a child in determining custody in the case of a proposed relocation of one parent, the trial court may appropriately consider several factors including: the advantages of the relocation in terms of its capacity to improve the life of the child; the motives of the custodial parent in seeking the move; the likelihood that the custodial parent will comply with visitation orders when he or she is no longer subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of North Carolina; the integrity of the noncustodial parent in resisting the relocation; and the likelihood that a realistic visitation schedule can be arranged which will preserve and foster the parental relationship with the noncustodial parent.

The Provincial Court declined to do this and noted that this essentially amounted to an order for custody and access regarding the dog, which it found it did not have jurisdiction to do as these kinds of orders apply to children and not pets.

• Make certain marital settlement agreements and pre - or post-nuptial agreements are properly prepared; • Identify tax issues which may affect the distribution of marital property and the payment of child, spousal or family support; • Help you effectively deal with complex legal issues involving community property laws; • Negotiate or mediate the difficult and emotional issues relating to legal separation, dissolution of marriage and child custody; • Protect clients who need restraining orders for domestic violence; • Handle matters relating to modification of child custody, spousal support or child support; • Offer a collaborative process enabling clients to resolve their issues without court intervention.

For example, your separation order will designate which spouse gets the marital home, who should pay child support, holiday visitation and child custody, each spouse's right to assets and debts, and even insurance coverage.

The Appellant alleged several grounds of appeal, including that the judge erred in his analysis of the child's habitual residence, in concluding that the Respondent had not acquiesced in the child's relocation, in failing to respect an order of the Montana court that it had no jurisdiction over the child's custody, and in failing to give effect to Article 13 (b) of the Hague Convention, which allows a court to refuse to return a child where there is a grave risk that his or her return would expose the child to physical or psychological harm or otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation.

therefore, according to this if an access parent removes a child from his or her country of habitual residence (and effectively eliminates the other parent's right to custody) then an order may be made for his or her immediate return if the country to which the child has been taken to has also ratified the Convention.

First, since Ms S and Ms L have sole custody of the Union citizens concerned who are minors, a decision by them to leave the territory of the Member State of which those children are nationals, in order to preserve the family unit, would have the effect of depriving those Union citizens of all contact with their biological fathers, should such contact have been maintained up to the present.

Be prepared for the possibility that your Canadian child custody order — though validly issued and fully enforceable in Canada — may not automatically be recognized in the country to which you are travelling.

Barring a successful appeal from the order of child custody and parenting arrangements a spouse seeking to vary an order must show a substantial change in the conditions means and circumstances of the parents or the child has occurred since the last Order which if known at the time of the last order would have led to a different reorder of child custody and parenting arrangements a spouse seeking to vary an order must show a substantial change in the conditions means and circumstances of the parents or the child has occurred since the last Order which if known at the time of the last order would have led to a different reorder must show a substantial change in the conditions means and circumstances of the parents or the child has occurred since the last Order which if known at the time of the last order would have led to a different reOrder which if known at the time of the last order would have led to a different reorder would have led to a different result.

Pullman v. Pullman 2000 BCSC 1654 After nine days of trial during which the mother sought sole custody with limited visitation by the children to their father, and a Section 15 Report by Robert Colby recommended that the mother be the primary residential parent, Mr. Justice MacKinnon ordered that the two daughters of the marriage, aged five and seven, be under the joint custodial care of both parents and that a shared parenting schedule of week on week off be implemented.

For example, a Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act Affidavit is required, establishing the home state of the children and court's jurisdiction over them, and completed IV - D Child Support Services Application / Referral form, which helps facilitate the determination of child support through the Michigan Friend of the Court, the agency responsible for overseeing and enforcing child custody and support orders and modificatChild Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act Affidavit is required, establishing the home state of the children and court's jurisdiction over them, and completed IV - D Child Support Services Application / Referral form, which helps facilitate the determination of child support through the Michigan Friend of the Court, the agency responsible for overseeing and enforcing child custody and support orders and modificCustody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act Affidavit is required, establishing the home state of the children and court's jurisdiction over them, and completed IV - D Child Support Services Application / Referral form, which helps facilitate the determination of child support through the Michigan Friend of the Court, the agency responsible for overseeing and enforcing child custody and support orders and modificatChild Support Services Application / Referral form, which helps facilitate the determination of child support through the Michigan Friend of the Court, the agency responsible for overseeing and enforcing child custody and support orders and modificatchild support through the Michigan Friend of the Court, the agency responsible for overseeing and enforcing child custody and support orders and modificatchild custody and support orders and modificcustody and support orders and modifications.

If you fear for the safety of your child when he interacts with his parent, or you know he is or has been abused physically or psychologically by his parent, you can petition the court for a custody or visitation order which includes the request for supervised visits.

The two primary types of legal custody, which is determined either by agreement between parents or by order of a judge, are joint legal custody, which is an arrangement where both parents share the rights to make the major decisions for their child, and sole legal custody, which is when one parent can make these decisions without input from the other parent.

Generally, there will be a support and custody hearing after the petition is filed, in which temporary spousal support custody and child support is ordered.

If your spouse refuses to let you see your children, a Pennsylvania judge can order him to appear in court — with the children — and place bond, which he would lose if he violates the terms of the temporary custody order again.

A court order usually establishes each parent's right to legal custody, which determines who can make major decisions in the child's life.

Temporary child support orders are usually accompanied by temporary custody and visitation orders, which formalize the custody and visitation arrangement.

Possessory Conservatorship — In Texas, possessory conservatorship refers to the child custody arrangement in which one parent by agreement or by court order is given some rights in a child's upbringing, when the other parent is designated as sole managing conservator and has the primary responsibility for a child or children after a divorce.

Ohio child custody laws have set the factors, as previously mentioned, in order to evaluate the nature of parent - child relationship and whether or not joint custody, which means shared parenting, is plausible.

Sole Managing Conservatorship — In Texas, sole managing conservatorship refers to the child custody arrangement in which one parent by agreement or by court order is given the sole rights, duties and privileges concerning a child or children after a divorce.

This type of order stipulates which parent should have custody of a couple's minor children.

For example, the Court will make orders [which are same as in a divorce] for the issues: child custody; child visitation; spousal support; child support; division of debt and division of assets.

The court will only modify a custody order upon a demonstration of a material change of circumstances, which means that the existing custodial arrangement is no longer in the best interests of the child, such as when a serious health problem prevents a parent from taking care of a child.

(a)(1)[«In making an order granting custody to either parent, the court shall consider, among other factors, which parent is more likely to allow the child frequent and continuing contact with the noncustodial parent...»].)

Child support is based predominantly on the incomes of the parents, the number and ages of the children, and the amount of time the children will be spending with each parent based on the parenting plan to which the parties have agreed (i.e., their consensual custody arrangement) or the parenting plan ordered by a judge).

Interestingly, Judge Baer noted that in a frequently - ordered arrangement in which the non-custodial parent exercised partial custody every weekend and four weeks during summer vacation, the non-custodial parent would spend 132 days with the children.

Elsewhere, in Moist v. Moist, the Dauphin County trial court held that a shared custody order in which Father exercised custody 45 % of the children's time constituted an «unusual amount of time» under Rule 1910.16 - 5 (m).

The court will schedule an initial hearing, which could result in an order of mandatory mediation, an order to appoint an attorney for your child, a psychological evaluation of the parties, or temporary custody orders.

If the court gets involved to determine custody, Arkansas judges can order home studies of each parent's home in an effort to determine which is the better environment for the children.

A Department of Defense directive, which has the force of law, requires service members, civilian military employees, and their family members who are outside the United States to comply with court orders requiring the return of minor children who are subject to a court order on custody or visitation.

In Depp v. Holland, the Superior Court recently affirmed a shared custody support order entered by the Honorable Cynthia A. Baldwin, in which Judge Baldwin calculated child support using a variation of this offset formula method.

The petition, which sets out what a person wants a judge to do (such as dissolve the marriage, rule on custody, order child support, and divide marital property and debt), is generally personally served by a sheriff's deputy or other authorized process server.

If the court determines the best interests of the children are not served by being with the parents, third party custody can be ordered, which might mean, for example, placing the children with grandparents.

According to North Carolina child custody laws, if a military parent has sole or joint custody of a child and receives deployment papers that involve moving a substantial distance from the parent's home, a North Carolina family court will issue a temporary custody order of the child during the parent's absence, which shall end no later than 10 days following the parent's return.