Not exact matches
The Low Incomes Tax Reform
Group (LITRG) has welcomed today's House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee report
which makes a number of recommendations on how universal credit could better support self - employed
claimants.
The Government must give better and fuller guidance to tax credit and other benefit
claimants about the circumstances in
which they may still claim the child element of child tax credit or universal credit for a third or subsequent child born on or after 6 April 2017, says the Low Incomes Tax Reform
Group (LITRG).1 Previously announced changes to tax credits, universal credit and some other benefits
which limit payment of the child element to no more than two children come into effect today (6 April).
«I am impressed by the success of the Pathways programme - it proves that with the right support we can make a difference even with long - term benefit
claimants,
which is a
group of people usually considered harder to help,» employment minister Stephen Timms said.
(i) size and nature of the organization; (ii) part of the organization with
which the refugee
claimant was most directly concerned; (iii) refugee
claimant's duties and activities within the organization; (iv) refugee
claimant's position or rank in the organization; (v) length of time the refugee
claimant was in the organization, particularly after acquiring knowledge of the
group's crime or criminal purpose; (vi) method by
which the refugee
claimant was recruited and opportunity to leave.
The Amersham research
group,
which comprised other scientists apart from the
claimants, carried out human studies on one of the more promising compounds in 1988.
Solicitors for the Council wrote to the GMB and UNISON unions notifying them that should the
claimants succeed in their
group claim under the Equal Pay Act 1970 and the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (SDA 1975) then the Council would seek a contribution under CLIA 1978,
which the Council asserted the tribunal had jurisdiction to determine.
A
group of
claimants led by investment manager Gina Miller and hairdresser Deir Dos Santos are demanding that the triggering of Article 50 —
which starts a two - year deadline for the exit process to be completed — be subject to a vote in parliament.
A second
group of
claimants,
which includes the putative spouse and his or her children, stepchildren, and parents of the decedent, may file a wrongful death claim only if they were dependents of the decedent at the time of his or her death.
We are also familiar with the myriad of cost sharing agreements and client constitution arrangements that bind
group litigation,
which may be especially complex where
claimants have different preliminary challenges to their specific claims.
It is unlikely change will occur in the short term, but the fact that lawmakers now recognise the advantage of the «opt - in» US approach to
group litigation, at least in certain circumstances, can only benefit
claimants — providing another means by
which they can seek redress.
The best known jurisdiction is perhaps, the US,
which is renowned, perhaps unfairly, for big ticket
group claims, involving many dozens if not hundreds of
claimants, with damages in the millions.
Many international lawyers realise that personal injury can become a global issue and there is a strong tendency of personal injury lawyers from different countries to unite their efforts,
which founded the first multinational
group of international
claimant counsel — this is really great!
The claim related to a
group action brought by no less than 599
claimants who holidayed at a Turkish resort in the summer of 2009
which had been booked though the defendant tour operator.
The
claimant, Property Alliance
Group (PAG), challenged RBS's claim to privilege over these documents, contending that the role of RBS's solicitors was not confined to the provision of legal advice but extended to the performance of administrative functions (for example, acting as the secretariat for the ESG and attending its meetings) for
which privilege could not be claimed.
They were playing in a courtyard and part of a walkway
which was the social area for their age
group when, running backwards, the first defendant collided with the
claimant.
Earlier this year, Duke Street confirmed an investment of up to # 200m in the Parabis
Group (
which includes
claimant business Cogent Law and the defendant firm Plexus Law).
In the latest in a series of interim judgments in the Air Cargo cartel damages claims,
which are being brought in the Chancery Division by several
groups of
claimants against British Airways plc, the High Court (Rose J) has held that Article 101 TFEU does not permit claims for damages to be brought in relation -LSB-...]
In an illustration of its travel - related personal injury expertise, Arion Jones is acting for the Freedom Travel
Group in a multi-party action brought by seven
claimants who suffered gastric illness,
which involves complex issues of medical causation and quantum and a dispute between two defendants.
The EAT held that as the
Claimant belonged to a
group that held a strong belief in the sanctity of marriage vows, she was put at a disadvantage by the school's PCP (from
which it did not resile).
In R v Spencer,
which dealt with informational privacy relating to Internet service subscriber data in the hands of third - party companies, Cromwell J, for the court, organized the expectation of privacy analysis into four general areas: (1) the subject matter of the alleged search; (2) the
claimant's interest in the subject matter; (3) the
claimant's subjective expectation of privacy; and (4) whether this subjective expectation of privacy was objectively reasonable, having regard to the totality of the circumstances.6 None of these tests are inconsistent; they are articulations of the same overarching concerns
grouped differently as suited to a particular inquiry.
The Lapps in G and E v Norway (1983) 35 DR 30 and the gipsies in Buckley v United Kingdom (Application 20348 / 92)(1996) 23 EHRR 101, to
which the
claimants had referred, belonged to distinctive
groups, each with a traditional culture and lifestyle so fundamental as to form part of its identity.
The
claimant had insurance with the Co-operative Insurance Society (CIS), and legal expenses and assistance insurance provided by DAS Legal Expenses Insurance Co Ltd (DAS),
which was part of a
group of companies.
The
claimant submitted that any payment by Helphire to DAS or to another company within the DAS
group was incapable in law of impacting on the claim
which was for the
claimant's loss.
The defendant solicitors had advised the
claimant companies,
which were members of the same
group, about the assignment of a lease between them.
Of increasing concern is the way in
which the government's allocation of funds to third parties wishing to participate as respondents in the native title claim process is funnelling NTRBs resources towards litigation rather than addressing the needs of the
claimant group.
One respondent in Queensland explained that most exclusive native title claims are only possible as a result of section 47 of the NTA (
which allows the extinguishing effect of a pastoral lease to be ignored if the lease is held by people in the
claimant group).
Of particular concern is the way in
which the Australian Government's allocation of funds to third party respondents to native title claims necessarily funnels NTRB resources towards litigation over agreement - making and the broader needs of the
claimant group.
While a number of states require the
claimant group to provide the State with evidence in relation to legal criteria as a condition precedent to commencing negotiation, there are varying degrees to
which the legal tests are applied.
Where the State, as manager of the land
which is the subject of the agreement, has particular priorities for that land,
claimant groups may be able to negotiate agreements that contribute to their development goals.
The particular impact of the Ward decision is reflected by the requirement in Queensland for a connection report
which provides a list of the native title rights and interests claimed, and a schedule of activities demonstrating the traditional law and custom of the native title
claimant group.
Another way in
which connection reports can be oppressive to
claimant groups is when they are required to hand over material that is culturally sensitive.
The requirement for those in the
claimant group to express the relationships
which connect them in terms of biological descent is at odds with traditional ways of defining who has rights to country...
Given the gravity of the consequences flowing from a finding that a
claimant group is not who they claim (and perceive themselves) to be, and consistent with principles of equality and respect for culture, as well as the intention of the Parliament in enacting the NTA «to rectify past injustices» and establish a «special procedure... for the just and proper ascertainment of native title rights and interests... in a manner that has due regard to their unique character», the Court should, it is respectfully submitted, approach the admission of oral testimonies of native title
claimants in ways
which accommodate Aboriginal accounts of their histories [85] and are, where appropriate, sceptical in the receipt of written records of the past.
[59] The consequence of treating the «handed down» requirement as the sole determinant of what is «traditional» law or custom is to discount well - established but more recent practices manifesting connection to land, and to insist upon evidentiary approaches requiring provision of conclusive evidence of pre-contact practices, customs and traditions
which will often be «next to impossible» [60] for
claimant groups to meet.
The South Australian Government has negotiation threshold issues
which include the registration of a native title claim before it will proceed with negotiations (notwithstanding the fact that it engages in non-native title negotiations), the resolution of any significant native title claim overlaps, the need to have a reasonably cohesive native title
claimant group, a willingness to negotiate, and a stable functioning management committee.
This year's Native Title Report looks at the way in
which governments, particularly state and territory governments, are moving beyond the limitations presented by the legal system to lay a foundation for native title
claimant groups that enable economic and social development to take place.
A central element of my response to these questions is directed to ways in
which the capacity of the
claimant group can be developed to take control of the development process.