Sentences with phrase «which delivered its judgment»

EFIM appealed to the CJEU, which delivered its judgment (until now available in the French and German language) on 19 September 2013.

Not exact matches

Such liberation follows from an encounter with a prior grace which promises salvation at the same time that it delivers judgment.

If a judge pronounce a judgment, render a decision, deliver a sealed verdict, and afterward reverse his judgment, they shall prosecute the judge for reversing the judgment which he has pronounced, and he shall pay twelve fold the damages which were (awarded) in said judgment; and publicly they shall expel him from his seat of judgment and he shall not return, and with the judges in a case he shall not take his seat.21

Recall that the Kogi State High Court sitting in Lokoja had delivered a judgment on the 29th of June, 2017 in which it invalidated the suspension of the embattled lawmaker.

He also cited section 396 (1) to (3) of the ACJ Act which stipulates that any application challenging the competence of criminal charges could only be considered along with the substantive issues in the case and ruling on it delivered along with the judgment on the entire case.

The suit in which the judgment was delivered on Wednesday was targeted against the Police, which Wike said had, last year, applied for a search warrant to be executed on his houses around the country.

Delivering his judgment on the application, Justice Anka held that, «In the face of the publication, which I find before me, and there being no responses from any interested party, I have no other option but to grant the orders as prayed».

On Monday 20th November 2017, the Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja delivered a judgment in which it ordered INEC to conduct the rerun election within 90 days of the judgment.

«In particular, the executive should, as a matter of urgency, purge itself of contempt of court by complying with the judgment of the Federal High Court delivered on December 2, 2016 which directed that Sheik Ibraheem Elzakzaky and his wife, Hajia Zeinab Elzakzaky be released from the illegal custody of the State Security Service.

Saraki's appeal filed through his lead counsel, Mr. Joseph Daudu (SAN), is challenging the majority judgment of the Court of Appeal in Abuja delivered on October 30, 2015, which affirmed the jurisdiction of the CCT to try him and the competence of the charges of false assets declaration preferred against him by the Federal Government.

He directed that the appellants should raise the issues in their interlocutory appea ls in when they file substantive appeals which they wish to file against the Court of Appeal's judgment delivered on Thursday.

The former ministers, in a text message to some of the members of the party, which was seen by our correspondent, said, «Finally, the Supreme Court of Nigeria has today officially notified our great party, the PDP, of the date to deliver judgment on the suit PDP vs. Sheriff and four others.

«In particular, the Executive should, as a matter of urgency, purge itself of contempt of court by complying with the judgment of the Federal High Court delivered on December 2, 2016 which directed that Sheik Ibraheem Elzakzaky and his wife, Hajia Zainab Elzakzaky be released from the illegal custody of the State Security Service

«For the avoidance of doubt, the court only heard and delivered judgment on a matter concerning certain amendments in the PDP constitution, which has nothing to do with the election of Senator Ali Modu Sheriff as the National Chairman or even that of his predecessor, Alhaji Adamu Muazu.

The party said this while referring to the Court of Appeal, Ilorin judgment delivered by Justice Isa Ayo Salami, which removed Segun Oni of the PDP from office and declared Fayemi as governor of Ekiti on October 15, 2010.

What's clear is that vital help for pet owners can take various forms, which is why listening and learning — while putting judgments aside — is as important as delivering the care itself.

After an Odyssey of nearly 10 years, the legal proceedings of Switzerland against German restrictions on flights to and from Zurich airport have come to an end: The CJEU, in its judgement delivered on 7 March 2013 (Case C ‑ 547 / 10 P), has rejected Switzerland's appeal against the judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2010 (Case T ‑ 319 / 05), by which the General Court had rejected Switzerland «s action for annulment against Commission Decision 2004 / 12 / EC of 5 December 2003 (OJ 2004 L 4, p. 13), thus allowing Germany to continue to apply unilateral restrictions on flights to and from Zurich airport over German territory.

Pill LJ, who delivered the leading judgment, noted that there was no authority directly on the point which required determination.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) will not make a judgment as to the quality of the advice given but will punish Solicitors if the way in which the advice was delivered or the manner in which complaints were handled falls short of the required standard.

In sum, the CJEU holds that the General Court erred in law in finding that the aid's compatibility should have been assessed under Regulation (EEC) 1191/69 for what concerned the payments made after 3 December 2009, and referred back the dispute for assessment of the two pleas which were not analysed at the time the judgment was delivered.

It is not the result of the case as such which has attracted attention but rather the comments of Lady Hale, President of the Supreme Court, who delivered a concurring judgment.

In delivering the judgment of the majority, Lord Templeman thought that the key indicator of tax avoidance was an arrangement in which the financial position of the taxpayer was unaffected (save for the costs of devising and implementing it) and through this arrangement the taxpayer sought to obtain a tax advantage without the reduction in income, loss or expenditure which Parliament intended to be suffered by any taxpayer qualifying for a reduction in his liability to tax.

The reference to the uncharacteristic speed with which the Court delivered judgment in the 0867 case leads to the final point relating to the performance of the Court which is the time which it has taken to deliver some judgments.

On 22 March 2017, the Supreme Court delivered its long awaited judgment in FCA v Macris [2017] UKSC 19 which determined what it means to be...

In its long awaited ruling on the Eurotunnel case, the Competition Appeal Tribunal has delivered a wide - ranging judgment dealing with almost the whole of the legal framework within which the Competition Commission considers mergers.

Last week, the ECJ delivered its judgment in Case C - 398 / 13 P, Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami II, which deals with the EU ban on trade in seals products.

An issue that has been debated since before the inception of the UK Supreme Court is the form in which judgments are delivered.

In Lin & Phyo v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2015] EWHC 2484 (QB) Green J delivered a lengthy and detailed judgment which dismissed the data protection claim and upheld the approach of the Metropolitan Police.

At page 5 of its judgment, the JT stated the «Dubai Courts can make its decision on the merits of the case raised before it regardless of the existence of the injunction order which will disappear after the court delivers its judgment.»

Delivering judgment, Lord Neuberger said: «It seems to me that there is no inherent reason why a right to... make a noise which would otherwise be a nuisance, should not be established by prescription.»

JUSTICE O'CONNOR announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion with respect to Parts I, II, III - A, III - B, III - D, and IV, which is for the Court except insofar as it might be inconsistent with the views expressed in JUSTICE SCALIA»S concurrence, and an opinion with respect to Part III - C in which JUSTICE KENNEDY joins.

Specific topics which have been covered in recent conferences include judicial ethics; interpreters; delivering reasons for judgment; assessing credibility; social media; technology and search warrants; managing a provincial offence trial; effectively communicating an oral judgment; risk assessment and indicators of lethality at bail hearings; the Youth Criminal Justice Act; eye - witness identification; conducting pre-trials; specific issues at trials of regulatory offences; fly - in - courts, residential schools; application of Gladue principles; mistrials and bias; accident reconstruction; search warrant issues; domestic violence issues; orders for examination under the Mental Health Act; child apprehension warrants under the Child and Family Services Act; evidentiary issues; discrimination and harassment in the workplace; stress management; and pre-retirement planning.

This February, the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered a judgmentin which, one year after the C - 104 / 16 P Council v Front Polisario judgment, once more the EU's trade relations with Morocco took centre stage.

Ontario Court of Appeal Justice Robert Blair delivered an «extremely well written» judgment in the Livent matter, which may indicate that he anticipates... Read more

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion in which MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG joins.

General counsel who promote in - house lawyers, and executive management hiring general counsel are looking for those who have the experience and judgment to discern which law firms are best suited to what matters based on how they perform the work, predictably price their services, and deliver the right value and result.

Delivering the lead judgment, Lord Toulson said: «It seems instinctively unjust for a person to suffer injury as a result of the malicious prosecution of legal proceedings for which there is no reasonable ground, and yet not be entitled to compensation for the injury intentionally caused by the person responsible for instigating it» (at [43]-RRB-.

Sir Anthony Clarke MR, delivering the unanimous judgment of the Court of Appeal, was clear that (para 12) «there was an interference with the liberty of the appellants which amounted to the tort of false imprisonment unless it was lawful».

In 2013, a unanimous Supreme Court of Canada delivered judgment on Antrim Truck Centre Ltd. v. Ontario [2013] 1 SCR 594 in which the Camerons were awarded $ 393,000 as compensation for their loss of business and market value in the land.

The Law Lords could deliver judgment before the end of July in the Arctic Systems case — Jones v Garnett — which could affect up to 340,000 small businesses.

Delivering the lead judgment, Lord Justice Hickinbottom said «there does not appear to be a logical reason why London boroughs should be deprived of the powers which non-London local authorities have in respect of entertainment in parks under s 145.

Lord Justice Auld, who delivered the main judgment in the appellate court, (concurred in by his two colleagues), was adamant that there was no distinction to be drawn between the fact that this case concerned the duty of care owed by social workers, in contrast to East Berkshire which considered the ambit of the duty of care of doctors.

JUSTICE BRENNAN announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion, in which JUSTICE MARSHALL, JUSTICE BLACKMUN, and JUSTICE STEVENS join.

On March 14 2018 the Court of Justice of the European Union delivered judgment on Astellas Pharma v Helm AG and FIMEA in which Astellas challenged a previous decision..

The judgment also required the appellants to deliver possession of the property against which the mortgage was secured.