Sentences with phrase «which does everything for»

Not exact matches

This one, which covers a single or repetitive sale, is for the exporter who doesn't want to insure everything with Ex-Im.
The most important elements of the process don't have anything to do with how the coffee machine works or where to sign up for the spin class; they have everything to do with the company's culture, which is the hardest thing for a new person to absorb and the hardest thing for any business to put into words.
«We are trying to do everything to minimize hospital - acquired infection except for the most obvious and easiest thing to do in my opinion, which is to stop shaking hands,» UCLA professor of pediatrics and cardiologist Dr. Mark Sklansky tells NPR.
Responsible for some of the greatest visual effects pulled off on screen in the last 40 years, he's done everything from James Bond movies like «Moonraker» and «GoldenEye,» to Christopher Nolan's Batman trilogy and «Inception» (which he won an Oscar for).
That doesn't mean you can't create beautiful marketing graphics in minutes with Canva, which helps even the most graphically - challenged create everything from social - media images to presentations, for free.
Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte said he would do everything to «de-escalate» the confrontation, which he described as the worst the Netherlands had experienced for years.
What this newest study does, in addition to trying to discern which income levels are most affected, is to try to control for everything else that could affect how much a mom gets paid compared to a dad.
For many, the dream of dropping everything and moving to the country to do what they have done is a step too far, so they've created a window through which customers and potential customers can peer.
«The wireless industry has done everything it can to persuade federal regulators and state regulators not to require that backup power be put in place,» said Regina Costa, chair of the telecommunications committee of the National Association of State Utility Advocates, which speaks for consumer representatives.
If you are generous with vacation time, requests for days and afternoons off or lenient during longer lunch hours for mid-day sales, your employees will feel less anxious about having to get everything done for the season, which helps ensure their time on the clock is productive.
For my idea, there is no national competition other than PaperlessSolutions.com but they have a different business model (everything is done by mail) which is more concerning for many people as the scanning is happening by strangers somewhere other than their home and the prices are far more expensiFor my idea, there is no national competition other than PaperlessSolutions.com but they have a different business model (everything is done by mail) which is more concerning for many people as the scanning is happening by strangers somewhere other than their home and the prices are far more expensifor many people as the scanning is happening by strangers somewhere other than their home and the prices are far more expensive.
Screaming Frog Guide to Doing Almost Anything — Screaming Frog is a massively powerful tool, which is why this detailed review of just about everything you can do with Screaming Frog (including for link building purposes!)
Mr Towson points to «unlimited demand» for everything from entertainment to healthcare, which are growing at double digit rates and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future.
Everything I've discussed so far is free for users, including their iPad and iPhone apps which basically mimics everything a desktop user can do Everything I've discussed so far is free for users, including their iPad and iPhone apps which basically mimics everything a desktop user can do everything a desktop user can do on the go.
over at Jay Baer's blog The time is ripe to ask with new data available as part of Hubspot's IPO, which confirms they are burning a lot of cash (like everyone else from startup to Amazon) If the Gartner Hype Cycle holds, Inbound and Social Media are overdue for a beating from the press Don't believe the hype, effective inbound campaigns trump everything Inbound is the right message for the mass market, and will continue to be even if the press beats on it.
Pfizer certainly doesn't want to give it away for a song, which Read noted when Pfizer released fourth - quarter earnings in late January: «We remain on track to make this decision, which could include everything from a full or partial separation to ultimately deciding to retain the business, during 2018.»
It goes without saying that I agree with Pete's center - right agenda below, with its mend them, don't end them approach to our minimalist entitlements and its due concern for doing everything that can be done to sustain our nongovernmental intermediary institutions (which, of course can be choked by too much or the wrong kind of government).
Does Huntsman recognize the ways in which public policy — everything from education policy to funding for high - tech research — affects these deep questions?
The number one issue is abortion on every agenda, yet this is an issue which is not stopped by legislation, it is stopped by attacking poverty, by increasing love for children, by accepting everything a sinner does — instead the goal is secular laws, shaming women with ultrasounds.
«We are (allegedly) fallen, which must explain why we are not perfect... Gee, there has to be a reason... a purpose... for everything... because... gee... i just know my «god» would not do this for a mere prank»
For everything that they do and say [used to] conform to certain canons of consistency and coherence; [but now] those contexts which would be needed to make sense of what they are doing have been lost, perhaps irretrievably.
The Church is a mission, and everything the Church does is ordered to that mission, which is the proclamation of the gospel for the conversion of the world to Christ.
John's baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins was the Jewish baptism of repentance which I wrote a few posts about, and which has nothing to do with receiving eternal life, and everything to do with the repentance of Israel as a nation so that she can be restored to her rightful place among the nations as God promised in Scripture.
Thus the traditional conception of deity, which we have received from our past, puts its main stress on divine absoluteness or aseity; on divine causative agency as the explanation of everything that occurs whether by direct divine willing or by indirect divine permission with respect to evil done in the world; on divine self - containedness and hence lack of necessary relationship with anything else; on divine impassability, which makes any suffering impossible for God; and on divine moral perfection, with the giving of laws in accordance with which everything should be ordered.
Nor does political ethics» crafty, sharp tactics, which is an excuse for everything.
I find burnt toast to be great for a hangover, which is obviously proof that the judeo - christian god does indeed exist and created everything in the universe thousands of years ago in perfect order, even though there are trees older than the universe...
You don't choose who you are and what you look like, for example, that's Predestination, but you choose what you do, that's Free Will, which God DOES NOT interfere with (gives and honors,) even though He foreknows everything!
If you care about the people in this world living closest to the margins, then you need to do everything in your power to slow the rate at which the planet warms, for they are the most vulnerable.
You do not understand everything the Christian church teaches, you say, and some things that you think you do understand you do not believe, but you at least see enough in the kind of faith and life for which Christianity stands so that you would like to do something about it.
Not only does His imagelessness not prevent Him from manifesting Himself in the visible world, but it is just this imagelessness which makes His manifestation possible: «He is the history God which He is, only when He is not localized in Nature; and precisely because He makes use of everything potentially visible in Nature, every kind of natural existence, for His manifestation.»
(Acts 3:17) But this ignorance was in part at least the result of a mysterious blindness that had come upon them as a judgment for their sins, their initial unresponsiveness mounting eventually to active hatred and a «blind» fury of malice by which they attributed everything he said or did to the inspiration of Beelzebul, the chief of devils.
Christianity, and in fact any religion that believes in a personal god / creator, has two fundamental flaws that have absolutely nothing to do with science and everything to do with logic, which incidentally forms the foundation for the only universal / objective truths of reality (putting aside the Cartesian dualism problem).
The unlimited freedom of everybody to claim absolute freedom for everything works like a sort of secret brain - washing by anonymous powers which does not necessarily abolish freedom but narrows in advance the sphere in which the individual can make his free decision.
They do not in any way represent the Sikhs and if you look further you will see they have there own Gurdwara's and follow their own, militant sub-set of the Sikh religion, which if you read our holy book is totally and completely wrong and immoral and goes against everything a Sikh stands for.
For metaphysics, provided it conducts a correct demonstration of God's existence which does not make him a component of the world and its process, God is the transcendent ground, sustaining everything, but not a demiurge whose activity is carried on inside the world.
This phrase, «God can do all things,» is rightly understood to mean that God can do all things that are possible; and for this reason He is said to be omnipotent... God is called omnipotent because He can do all things that are possible absolutely... everything that does not imply a contradiction in terms, is numbered amongst those possible things, in respect of which God is called omnipotent: whereas whatever implies contradiction does not come within the scope of divine omnipotence, because it can not have the aspect of possibility.
The baptism of Jesus by John in the Jordan has nothing to do with repenting of sin or getting saved, but everything to do with making a public declaration about which side Jesus is on and what He will live His life for.
Everything that Jesus did for us, His reasons for becoming Incarnate, are found in His Church, the Catholic Church which He founded.
but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!
Most believers do what you did in this post — assume that anyone who doesn't believe in God automatically hates everything about religion, which simply isn't true for most of us.
Yea, if his faith had been only for a future life, he surely would have cast everything away in order to hasten out of this world to which he did not belong.
This must mean that the Pope was not at first told everything: that a story was cooked up for him which was designed to explain why Wielgus's Polish critics were not happy with the appointment but which did not disclose enough to convince the Pope that Wielgus really could not function as head of the Polish church.
15 I do not mean to argue that there is a «given» to be defended, nor that frameworks are not operative; but only to suggest that the reduction of everything to cultural frameworks can not work in a two - option world, for that reality to which a framework argument can apply would then be missing.
Take a humble sincere approach and read the red print, I ain't God so I don't try a Guarantee it but I got a surprise or two which changed everything for me, there are many who claim the same result.
During this journey, he visited India also where, it is reported, he «reformed many things which were not rightly done among them; for they heard the reading of the Gospel in a sitting posture, and did other things which were repugnant to the divine law; and having reformed everything according to holy usage, as was not acceptable to God, he also confirmed the dogma of the Church.»
For instance, Hartshorne says that God does for the world everything which he should do for it (DR 2For instance, Hartshorne says that God does for the world everything which he should do for it (DR 2for the world everything which he should do for it (DR 2for it (DR 24).
He does a much better job of emphasizing mutuality in sexual relationships than he has in the past, (though I've never quite understood why so many complemementarians insist on hierarchal - based relationships in which wives submit to their husbands «in everything,» while simultaneously acknowledging the importance of mutuality when it comes to sex... but that's a topic for another day).
b Everything leads us to believe that it really does dispose of this vast reservoir of time, which is necessary for the normal achievement of its evolution.
If the scapegoat is relatively innocent (or at least, not completely guilty of everything for which they are charged), why does their death create peace between two warring sides?
The question at issue is whether we can account for everything — e.g., all biological processes, including behaviour (and some people would include, others exclude, mind and / or conscious self - awareness)-- in terms of those entities, as reductionists and mechanists claimed, or do we have to invoke something else, which might be organizing relations» or «system properties,» as anti-reductionists and organicists argued.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z