Sentences with phrase «which everything gave»

In most of these cases, what really stands out is the astonishing speed and seeming lack of warning with which everything gave way.

Not exact matches

Everything takes longer than you think — although the long run is often shorter than we expect given the accelerating rate at which technologies are changing our lives.

I'm glad I forgave him and that I therefore gave him a chance to make everything right, which he did.

Over that time, the cost of LIDAR technology, which gives Waymo vehicles a view of everything on and around a vehicle driving down a street, has dropped dramatically.

There's no app for the Z10, nor has the streaming video company released one yet for the PlayBook tablet, which is odd given that Netflix is on just about everything (I can even watch it on my toaster... okay, not really).

Everything the spacecraft has observed and catalogued so far will eventually help build a detailed 3D map of our galaxy, which will give us a new understanding of its structure and evolution.

I re-transcribe lists frequently, which forces me to think about everything on the list and gives me an opportunity to add and remove items.

Some worthwhile contenders include the «Discover it» card, which will double your cash back at the end of the first year, or Citi Double Cash, which gives you 2 percent cash back on everything with no annual fees, or Chase Freedom, which offers a $ 150 bonus if you spend $ 500 in the first three months, Schulz said.

What followed was the introduction of the Graph API, which was the means by which Facebook would facilitate the data exchange, and as you can see on an old Facebook developer page, Facebook was willing to give away just about everything:

Denton told POLITICO Media that he is not concerned about giving up some control to an outside investor — which is a reversal of virtually everything he's said for the past dozen years — because having to justify his decisions to someone outside Gawker would lead him to make better decisions.

He's giving everything he has to revolutionize transportation, energy capture and battery storage while making the safest, cleanest vehicles ever created, which the status quo said were impossible, and now all other car companies are chasing his lead.

But to make a comparison between Donald Trump's handling of Stormy Daniels (or his previous incidents of alleged infidelity) and the story of King David ignores the second — and most important — half of the story, as detailed in 2 Samuel 12, in which the prophet Nathan admonishes David, telling him that he has been given everything by God and yet wanted more, and took another man's wife and committed murder to have her.

Pfizer certainly doesn't want to give it away for a song, which Read noted when Pfizer released fourth - quarter earnings in late January: «We remain on track to make this decision, which could include everything from a full or partial separation to ultimately deciding to retain the business, during 2018.»

This points out that everything that you explained as being only aplicable to god, which is an explanation given because no other explanation is seen, saying this is amazing so god did it, is nowhere near close to looking at these phenomena, observing and collecting the data on it and saying this is our best understanding of it to date.

I have absolutely no problem with Poligomy it is the whole «an Angel gave golden plates (which have never been seen) to Joesph Smith» thing plus the whole women as subserviant to men aspect of LDS and the «inner circle of MEN only in the temples running everything» that make it hard for me to accept.

What happened gives us all the only truth which is God (ALLAH) is the lord and the creator of the heavens and earth and he only has the greatest power and he is the controller of everything in this universe and he can do whatever he wills any time and at any place.

We do not give everything to Caesar, but only that which belongs thereto.

Everything which can confirm a given system may be regarded as a fact, while everything which could falsify it may be treated as already an interEverything which can confirm a given system may be regarded as a fact, while everything which could falsify it may be treated as already an intereverything which could falsify it may be treated as already an interpretation.

Are you saying that serious scientists consider that something might exist outside of that which exists, which gave rise to everything that currently exists?

Thus the traditional conception of deity, which we have received from our past, puts its main stress on divine absoluteness or aseity; on divine causative agency as the explanation of everything that occurs whether by direct divine willing or by indirect divine permission with respect to evil done in the world; on divine self - containedness and hence lack of necessary relationship with anything else; on divine impassability, which makes any suffering impossible for God; and on divine moral perfection, with the giving of laws in accordance with which everything should be ordered.

That which can give being to everything that is can not be understood as one finite entity among others, or as merely the first in a long series of causal agents.

Everything — that is the meaning which we give to our life or rather which we allow God to give it, and thus our salvation.

While in one sense it is correct to identify this consciousness and experience as a human phenomenon, in another sense it is not; for a total vision, or a quest for it, must negate and oppose every isolated and particular expression of experience, and therefore it must set itself against everything which is given or immediately present to us as consciousness or experience.

We would be left with the static bloc universe in which everything is given.

Or as Tillich has it, «The appetitus of every being to fulfil itself through union with other beings is universal...» (32) Agape, the love that gives with no thought of return; eros, the love that finds the beloved valuable, and philia, the love that shares and works for the vision of the good - none of these can be reduced to sexual desire, but all of them in different ways attest to the oneness of love, so evident in sexual union, as «that which drives everything that is towards everything else that is.»

You don't choose who you are and what you look like, for example, that's Predestination, but you choose what you do, that's Free Will, which God DOES NOT interfere with (gives and honors,) even though He foreknows everything!

Brightman also holds that, even though what is given to God — and what God knows (which is everything which can be known)-- is vastly greater than what is given in our experience, a similar limitation applies to God.

It's silly, given how similar Emerson and Nietzsche are on nature as a condition in which nothing really is but everything is becoming, that the heirs to Emerson in this regard refuse to recognize the middle aged as existing in a state of becoming that makes young - versus - old analysis ridiculous.

Also, to every beast of the earth, to every bird of the air, and to everything that creeps on the earth, in which there is life, I have given every green herb for food»; and it was so.

Here the insight of some of the Eastern Orthodox divines may be of help to us, not to mention the fashion in which (to give one example) we find Father Zossima in The Brothers Karamazov speaking of the holiness of the very dirt under his feet and of everything else that surrounds him in the non-human creation.

It used the incident, as it used everything else that was given it in the oral tradition about Jesus which preceded the setting - down in written texts the story of Jesus, as a way in which the importance of the originating event was declared.

In doing this, we have also seen how one of the consequences of authentic preaching is a determination, established in the hearts and minds and wills of those who have assisted at worship, to give themselves more fully to the service of God — as «co-creators», in Whitehead's fine word, with God in the great work of «amorization», establishing in this world (so far as a finite order will permit it) a society marked by caring, justice, responsibility, interest in others, and relief from oppression, devoted to everything positive which promotes the fullest actualization of human possibility.

It is a beautifully sad story, an elegy on the world of New Brunswick woodsmen and their women after the Second World War, when the old ways of lumbering, around which everything turned, were being forced to give way to the mechanization brought by American companies capitalizing on an insatiable market for fancier toilet paper and endlessly multiplied government reports.

And reason precedes everything, creative reason, and we are truly the reflection of this reason... We are planned and wanted and, therefore, there is an idea that precedes me, a meaning that precedes me, which I must discover, follow and which, in the end, gives meaning to my life.»

The «clarity of inner being,» the willingness to give up everything, which animated previous generations of revolutionaries, has vanished.

Whether we consider the rocky layers enveloping the Earth, the arrangement of the forms of life that inhabit it, the variety of civilizations to which it has given birth, or the structure of languages spoken upon it, we are forced to the same conclusion: that everything is the sum of the past and that nothing is comprehensible except through its history.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

It is a distortion of love, an inversion of the self's true direction, so that everything to which the self should be given in love is now sought as a possession.

That is not the conventional Catholic approach, which usually gives the impression that only the ideal is good enough and everything else is a mortal sin (usually gives that impression, does it?

15 I do not mean to argue that there is a «given» to be defended, nor that frameworks are not operative; but only to suggest that the reduction of everything to cultural frameworks can not work in a two - option world, for that reality to which a framework argument can apply would then be missing.

I'm sorry, but «Jesus» doesn't give somebody like her, who is steeped in paganism, «divine revelations» outside the Bible, nor would He promise to bless a book she is going to write — which, with its «new» revelations, render moot God's Word which tells us everything we need to know.

Heb 7:2 And to whom Abraham gave a tenth part of everything which he had, being first named King of righteousness, and then in addition, King of Salem, that is to say, King of peace; Error # 2 - Abraham in this scripture gave a (specifically stated) 10th part of all (that is everything) he had.

Assuming that Sunyata, or Total Emptiness, only appears as a consequence of the total emptying of consciousness and experience, can we surmise that God and the World can only appear as Totality or Total Togetherness as a consequence of the total emptying of everything which is given and manifest to us as God and the World?

When you give everything a subjective aim, and make this apply right down the scale, you are using language which is very difficult to make intelligible, except in the case of what Whitehead calls «high grade organisms.»

In Acts, Luke uses this title when writing about work currently going on; the work of the risen, exalted Christ: «God exalted him... as Leader and Savior to give repentance to Israel and forgiveness of sins» (Acts 5:31); and again: «By raising Jesus» (Acts 13:33) «God has brought to Israel a Savior, Jesus as he promised» (Acts 13:23), and «through this man forgiveness of sins is proclaimed to you, and by him everyone that believes is freed from everything from which you could not be freed by the law of Moses» (Acts 13:38).

The Christian community must conceive its responsibility in terms of membership in the divine and universal society; it knows that it must give answer to the God who is Lord of heaven and earth for everything with which it deals.

And it gives them hope, which is a powerful thing when everything is going wrong around you.

God really tempts man, moreover, and demands that he give up everything and go through the extremity of danger and the gate of dread before he can receive the grace which enables him to love God»» in the manner in which only He can be loved.»»

From this very moment everything is compromised, and our only option, when things go well, is to see therein the loving grace of the Lord, the sign which is given to us and which also claims us, the sign of the grace shown to us.

Everything has been perverted by the means which this perfect one has chosen to actualize the wisdom, beauty, and greatness that God has given him.