Sentences with phrase «which everything is seen»

Not exact matches

Since I can't see everything, it's better for me to learn to create the best life I can with what I have, which means developing the social and emotional skills internally to create the best life I can.

When you think about the cost of real world advertising, which does not have the large scale potential of internet marketing, and the cost of building, purchasing, or renting a physical store, you begin to see the incredible potential of the internet, where everything that isn't free is still so much cheaper.

I see a lot of startup companies led by inexperienced entrepreneurs get into trouble from overspending because they are trying to adhere to a brilliant strategy in which everything happens in perfect order.

Everything had its own intricacy, but everything was from the point of view from the camera, which is great, because in person you don't see it as well, but once you put a camera in front of these, it just works Everything had its own intricacy, but everything was from the point of view from the camera, which is great, because in person you don't see it as well, but once you put a camera in front of these, it just works everything was from the point of view from the camera, which is great, because in person you don't see it as well, but once you put a camera in front of these, it just works perfectly.

«It's a matter of my choosing to do the work of somehow altering or getting free of my natural, hard - wired default setting, which is to be deeply and literally self - centered and to see and interpret everything through this lens of self.»

They have done everything they said they were going to do, which is something new that I haven't seen from a technology company.

What followed was the introduction of the Graph API, which was the means by which Facebook would facilitate the data exchange, and as you can see on an old Facebook developer page, Facebook was willing to give away just about everything:

Additionally, restaurants will do everything in their power to ensure that they keep their existing customers coming back — which is why you see so many restaurants taking an aggressive attitude toward combating negative reviews on websites like Yelp and TripAdvisor.

Mid-teens P / Es are now becoming commonplace and in some cases, they are even approaching 10 times earnings which is something I've never seen in over 30 years of owning MLPs (perhaps save for a very brief period in early 2009, when almost everything was totally crushed, and the 2015 energy collapse).

Now in 2018, I don't want to project that everything was negative in 2017: we've seen such individuals as Nimrod May from Sirin Labs, individuals like Mikhail Mironov from ICORating, who are having one of the most successful ICOs of 2017, and now is coming out with one of the first cell phones that has an encrypted wallet included on an Android platform, which I think a phenomenal piece of technology moving forward.

This points out that everything that you explained as being only aplicable to god, which is an explanation given because no other explanation is seen, saying this is amazing so god did it, is nowhere near close to looking at these phenomena, observing and collecting the data on it and saying this is our best understanding of it to date.

I served this country, volunteered for war, and now am left to deal with idiots like you who want to see stories like this, read some kind of republicanized twist into everything, blame Israel and Obama for your own personal failures (to include turkey farms - which I abhor unless free range), then go ahead: you're embarrassing yourself, your family, and every good person, Jews included, that you know.

I have absolutely no problem with Poligomy it is the whole «an Angel gave golden plates (which have never been seen) to Joesph Smith» thing plus the whole women as subserviant to men aspect of LDS and the «inner circle of MEN only in the temples running everything» that make it hard for me to accept.

2) atoms which are comprised of energy and thus create everything else we can and can not see can be constructed from placing the proper atoms into their appropriate structed forms.

7 What Lynch objects to is two kinds of imagination, the univocal and the equivocal, the one which flattens out all the density and variety of historical complexity through the imposition of an idea (the allegorical and didactic mentalities) and the other which sees everything as completely diverse and unrelated to anything else (the fideistic and the autonomous mentalities).

Actually, I don't know how Paul did tent making and everything else But he also wrote (1 Cor 9:7 - 12 see Below) I have recently graduated from seminary, which is $ 50,000 in tuition alone, not including books and expenses during those years and time away from a good job.

In fact, is it not a more static view than the Aristotelian view of becoming which sees everything that comes forth as already pre-contained in the beginning, for this latter, at least, allows for a becoming, whereas in the former, there is a mere juxtaposition of one stage with the other?

You see, I grew up in a home in which the love of God was the foundation for everything.

it's not a question of whether or not one believes in metaphysics, but simply through WHICH metaphysics is one seeing everything?

To see the world in the Christian way — which, as I say in the book, requires the eye of charity and a faith in Easter — is in some sense to venture everything upon an absurd impracticality (I almost sound Kierkegaardian when I say it that way).

In John 18:5 - 6 Jesus sais «I AM he» and The power of his declaration of BEING GOD brought them to their knees... This clearly coincides with Exodus 3 when God appeared to Moses and Declared that his NAME was «I AM who I AM» Do you REALLY think that that is not by design??? Is this not also a very clear foreshadowing of the future (Romans 14:11, and Philliapians 2:10 - 11) Please oh please see how the Bible is so intricately intertwined and full of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all of life's questions are all within this book, not other sources, if one but will accept them, pray over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this worlAM he» and The power of his declaration of BEING GOD brought them to their knees... This clearly coincides with Exodus 3 when God appeared to Moses and Declared that his NAME was «I AM who I AM» Do you REALLY think that that is not by design??? Is this not also a very clear foreshadowing of the future (Romans 14:11, and Philliapians 2:10 - 11) Please oh please see how the Bible is so intricately intertwined and full of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all of life's questions are all within this book, not other sources, if one but will accept them, pray over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this worlAM who I AM» Do you REALLY think that that is not by design??? Is this not also a very clear foreshadowing of the future (Romans 14:11, and Philliapians 2:10 - 11) Please oh please see how the Bible is so intricately intertwined and full of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all of life's questions are all within this book, not other sources, if one but will accept them, pray over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this worlAM» Do you REALLY think that that is not by design??? Is this not also a very clear foreshadowing of the future (Romans 14:11, and Philliapians 2:10 - 11) Please oh please see how the Bible is so intricately intertwined and full of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all of life's questions are all within this book, not other sources, if one but will accept them, pray over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this worlis not by design??? Is this not also a very clear foreshadowing of the future (Romans 14:11, and Philliapians 2:10 - 11) Please oh please see how the Bible is so intricately intertwined and full of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all of life's questions are all within this book, not other sources, if one but will accept them, pray over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this worlIs this not also a very clear foreshadowing of the future (Romans 14:11, and Philliapians 2:10 - 11) Please oh please see how the Bible is so intricately intertwined and full of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all of life's questions are all within this book, not other sources, if one but will accept them, pray over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this worlis so intricately intertwined and full of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all of life's questions are all within this book, not other sources, if one but will accept them, pray over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this worlis why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this wWhich you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this wwhich the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this worlam not of this world.

The «signs» are just everything which we meet, but seen as something really addressing us, rather than as objective phenomena.

In doing this, we have also seen how one of the consequences of authentic preaching is a determination, established in the hearts and minds and wills of those who have assisted at worship, to give themselves more fully to the service of God — as «co-creators», in Whitehead's fine word, with God in the great work of «amorization», establishing in this world (so far as a finite order will permit it) a society marked by caring, justice, responsibility, interest in others, and relief from oppression, devoted to everything positive which promotes the fullest actualization of human possibility.

I was raised CAtholic, and by choice became pagan (actually, not Pagan, which is it's own religion, but Druid, for those Christians out there who care to learn something) because to not see god in everything around you is utterly ridiculous to me.

They do not in any way represent the Sikhs and if you look further you will see they have there own Gurdwara's and follow their own, militant sub-set of the Sikh religion, which if you read our holy book is totally and completely wrong and immoral and goes against everything a Sikh stands for.

Traditions of every kind, hoarded and manifested in gesture and language, in schools, libraries, museums, bodies of law and religion, philosophy and science — everything that accumulates, arranges itself, recurs and adds to itself, becoming the collective memory of the human race — all this we may see as no more than an outer garment, an epiphenomenon precariously superimposed upon all the other edifices of Nature (the only truly organic ones, as it may appear): but it is precisely this optical illusion which we have to overcome if our realism is to reach to the heart of the matter.

The integration of the supernatural and natural worlds suggests to Pepler that «the whole universe» is seen «from the divine angle» so that «a unified view in which everything that is created forms a single whole.»

Here it is shown clearly that the idea of sin is not radically conceived, so long as the idea of the possibility of good works persists along with it, so long as the confession of sin can be something which makes sin pardonable, so long as man is not seen as wholly and in everything a sinner before God.

It is general in the sense that God sees the value of this event, the brother's actiondecision, in relation to everything else which is actual, i.e., everything else that has ever happened.

He takes delight in everything, and whenever one sees him taking part in a particular pleasure, he does it with the persistence which is the mark of the earthly man whose soul is absorbed in such things.

On the contrary, I should claim, what I have been saying is metaphysical in the second sense of the word which I proposed in an earlier chapter; it is the making of wide generalizations on the basis of experience, with a reference back to verify or «check» the generalizations, a reference which includes not only the specific experience from which it started but also other experiences, both human and more general, by which its validity may be tested — and the result is not some grand scheme which claims to encompass everything in its sweep, but a vision of reality which to the one who sees in this way appears a satisfactory, but by no means complete, picture of how things actually and concretely go in the world.

Oh, I love everything you write and was surprised to see that you do not believe in universalism (christian universalism I mean, which is salvation of the world in Jesus Christ - restoration of all things)!!

How is it that you believe in a religious doctrine that has been wrong about everything in the observable world, but you believe that they are right about G - d which can not be seen?

Thus, as I see it, the options which remain are in fact two: either an existentialist approach or a «process thought» approach, since the «secular» theology in itself does nothing more than deny a particular kind of metaphysic and leaves us open to the possibility of interpreting the secular world, and everything else in human experience, in some appropriate manner.

Bultmann saw the pure form in the «apothegm,» «the original specific fragment which would sum things up concisely; interest would be concentrated on the word [spoken by] Jesus at the end of a scene; the details of the situation would lie far from this kind of form; Jesus would never come across as the initiator... everything not corresponding to this form Bultmann attributed to development.»

Out of everything written here by a Christian believer (right wrong or indifferent to level of interpretation of the Bible, which yes could be deemed us vs them) somehow leads you to the end result of calling it the way «you» see it, and then having you asking for observed proof followed by mocking faith.

His first postulate is that doing good is nothing more than avoiding evil, while his second is that in a Demiurge - ruled universe there is always available to an elite a trustworthy perspective in which anyone and everything at any time can be seen as nothing but evil.

When we look at the very basis of all science (that is quantum physics and the math which underlies it) we see that everything truly is governed by randomness and probabilities, not by determinism.

But this does not mean that we are not called upon to respond to God's previous invitation which he extended to all men when He became incarnate in Christ or that we should not see everything that came before, has come since, and will come, in the light of this His, until now — we can not say more, but also certainly not anything less — supreme revelation.

The second possible position with regard to science and religion is to identify them more or less completely by seeing the evolving universe as driven by a single energy which runs through and builds into everything that we call matter and everything that we call spirit.

From this very moment everything is compromised, and our only option, when things go well, is to see therein the loving grace of the Lord, the sign which is given to us and which also claims us, the sign of the grace shown to us.

(6) He saw psychopathology as rooted in undeveloped resources in persons: «Hidden in the neurosis is a bit of still undeveloped personality, a precious fragment of the psyche lacking which a man is condemned to resignation, bitterness, and everything else that is hostile to life.

And what happens when the bottom drops out of everything we know to have seen all that we thought was secure, and the world going to hell in a hand basket — which incidently, it already is.

Perhaps his material had been intercepted, but «there is nothing that would disturb me more at this moment than to know that these manuscripts had reached you and that you were holding them back... For goodness sake, curb that moderation and prudence of which I suspect you,... I came to Wittenberg and amid all the delight of being with my friends again I found this drop of bitterness... Everything else that I hear and see pleases me very much... Commend me to the most illustrious Sovereign from whom I want to keep my arrival in Wittenberg and my departure a secret... Farewell.

Moving to the U.S. from small - town Russia in the 90s and going to a Ben & Jerry's ice cream shop for the first time was completely mind - blowing because a) back home, we did not have dedicated ice cream shops, b) ice cream flavors I grew up with were very basic and I had never seen so many extensive flavor options c) they sold little tubs of ice cream to take home, which was unheard of in Russia at the time d) everything tasted incredibly decadent and delicious.

What it turns into is me throwing everything I can into a bag, toss it in the car, start pestering him to see if he's ready yet — to which he usually finds something completely unrelated to traveling to do around the house and then I'm left fuming, and the cycle continues.

We tried to go everywhere and see everything, which is quite a lot.

You've probably seen spinach added to almost everything, which is great for breakfast lovers.

I admit I'm guilty of putting this combination of tahini and dukkah on everything at the moment (which you may have seen on my Instagram) but it honestly works like magic!

But this is not everything for players which I'm happy to see.