Sentences with phrase «which family court cases»

Within the past few years the South Carolina Supreme Court has promulgated one rule in which family court cases are dismissed if no final hearing is requested within 365 days of the date the action is filed and another rule in which cases need to be mediated in most counties (including all three local countries: Berkeley, Charleston and Dorchester) before the docketing clerk can grant trial dates.

Within the past few years the South Carolina Supreme Court has promulgated one rule in which family court cases are dismissed if no final hearing is requested within 365 days of the date the action is filed and another rule in which cases need to be mediated in most counties (including all three local countries: -LSB-...]

Not exact matches

After March 4, 2013, an International Arrest Warrant will be issued against these Defendants.The guilty verdict followed nearly a month of deliberations by more than thirty sworn Citizen Jurors of the 150 case exhibits produced by Court Prosecutors, The Court's judgement declares the wealth and property of the churches responsible for the Canadian genocide to be forfeited and placed under public ownership, as reparations for the families of the more than 50,000 children who died in the residential schools.To enforce its sentence, the Court has empowered citizens in Canada, the United States, England, Italy and a dozen other nations to act as its legal agents armed with warrants, and peacefully occupy and seize properties of the Roman Catholic, Anglican and United Church of Canada, which are the main agents in the deaths of these children

The question might seem a befuddling one for a ballot in the heartland, but it stems from a New Jersey legal case in which a Muslim woman went to a family court asking for a restraining order against her spouse claiming he had raped her repeatedly.

On Monday, final arguments are scheduled in the family court case in Champaign County, which alleges emotional harm to the boy.

16 - and 17 - year - olds enter the justice system through the family court system, which is not the case in New York.

The debate over the «Raise The Age» legislation centered in large part around shifting cases involving teens to the family court system, which some lawmakers worried was overburdened and in need of more resources to begin with.

The Government published a new Adopters» Charter in October 2011, setting out clear guidance for both adoption agencies and prospective adopters and called for «radical reform» of the family justice system, which was taking 13 months on average to process a child's case through the family courts.

Judge Tanguay is fully assigned to Family Court, but Judge Eisenpress has assumed many cases from Supreme Court, which is why Keith Cornell will be picking up the remaining Family Court caseload.

Calls on the Commission, by the end of 2013, to submit a legislative proposal establishing an effective and comprehensive European whistleblower protection programme in the public and in the private sector to protect those who detect inefficient management and irregularities and report cases of national and cross-border corruption relating to EU financial interests and to protect witnesses, informers, and those who cooperate with the courts, and in particular witnesses testifying against mafia - type and other criminal organisations, with a view to resolving the difficult conditions under which they have to live (from risks of retaliation to the breakdown of family ties or from being uprooted from their home territory to social and professional exclusion); calls also on the Member States to put in place appropriate and effective protection for whistleblowers.

This week, the families of the Newtown shooting victims plan to be in Hartford, listening as lawyers lay out in state Supreme Court their case that the companies that manufactured and sold the military - style assault rifle used by the gunman bear responsibility for the attack in which 26 people, including 20 children, were killed.

The center proposal is, in part, a response to the state's Raise the Age legislation, which requires that, beginning Oct. 1, all 16 - year - olds charged with a crime have their cases handled in Family Court rather than criminal cCourt rather than criminal courtcourt.

Ulster County legislators expressed surprise — and in some cases anger — Thursday night at a county - financed mailing to voters which some say improperly advocates the relocation of family court from Kingston to the Town of Ulster.

A sixth case is pending in federal court in which Shupe - Roderick is suing «Wyoming Child Support Services» — an apparent reference to the Wyoming Department of Family Services — for allegedly intercepting a $ 643 federal tax refund to pay child support to his ex-wife.»

Your family is falling or has fallen apart, and in extreme cases one or more family members may be exhibiting behaviours which could even land them in the courts or in prison.

The case eventually made it to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, which determined that the district would not be required to reimburse the family because it had met the standard of providing «some educational benefit,» which the 10th Circuit said was consistent with the standard established in 1982 in the Supreme Court's Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson School District v. Rowley (Rowley) decision.

And if your child is missing school, that can lead to a family court case, which can then lead to being remanded by a judge, if you haven't — if you haven't attended school, due to their — due to family court scrutinization.

But, once her court case settled, she was transferred to a foster home through Friends of Animal Care and Control which led her to (finally) meeting her forever family.

A judge recently ruled against the company in one case, saying Warren «fraudulently induced» the family into a contract, making misrepresentations about the dog's abilities, which the court record claimed should instinctively be ready to alert.

In this case, the Court considered whether the family member who claims to be a «dependant» of an EU citizen can be required to produce documents which would prove that there is a factual situation of dependence.

Thorpe LJ provides some helpful procedural advice which may be incorporated into new family courts rules; but, in the longer term, does this case represent a continued widening of the door for outright capital provision for unmarried carer parents — in line with Re P (a child: financial provision)[2003] EWCA Civ 837, [2003] All ER (D) 312 (Jun)-- as against the interests in possession during a child's dependency favoured by earlier cases, eg T v S [1994] 1 FCR 743, [1994] 2 FLR 883; A v A [1995] 2 FCR 353, [1995] 2 FLR 356; J v C (a child: financial provision)[1998] 3 FCR 79, [1999] 1 FLR 152?

Some of the family members who attended court on that remand day had to wait all day for their matter to be heard, many were highly stressed, some could see their «ex» at the other end of the hall (which in cases involving domestic abuse can heighten fear and trauma), and many had no one there to support them.

This is also the case in respect of domestic violence or of exclusion orders (mercifully, the former sop to The Daily Mail and assorted Tory MPs in the Family Law Act 1996, s 41 (which said that if a couple were not married then «the court [should] have regard to the fact that they have not given each other the commitment involved in marriage») has been repealed).

This month, the government began negotiations with the European Union to make sure that as Britain leaves the EU, a clear set of rules remain in place to ensure that whenever an issue of family law crosses borders, it's clear which courts will hear the case, and which country's law will be applied.

In custody cases, does the family court have authority to make legal custody type decisions for a child (e.g., which school the child will attend; whether a child can get elective surgery) or does the court merely have authority to decide who gets to decide?

The Washington court found, inter alia, that Egyptian family courts apply specific Sharia law rules to child custody cases, under which a Muslim mother is disqualified from custody if she does not raise the child as a Muslim and / or if she does not comply with Muslim religious requirements or if she remarries or moves away from the father's domicile.

If the court finds family violence in any custody case, it can consider it to determine which parent is the safest parent to care for the child.

Maybe I'm cynical, but when the December 2014 roster listed Ricigliano v. Ricigliano as a case in which the issue was whether the family court erred in failing to award a -LSB-...]

He told the Star that he's hearing more and more stories of it taking much longer now to schedule civil and family matters in Superior Court — cases which do not carry the same constitutional right for a trial in a reasonable time.

Among the newly specified dodgy arguments against a MF — delicately put as «factors which should not outweigh the presumption in favour of allowing the assistance of a MF» — are the confidentiality of the proceedings and sensitivity of information in the court papers relating to the family's affairs; the LIP's apparent capacity to proceed without a MF; the fact that the LIP is unrepresented through choice; the fact that the hearing is a directions or case management hearing; and the MF's membership of an organisation which promotes a particular cause.

Appeals in family proceedings (including child support and certain other family related cases) against decisions of magistrates» courts which are initiated on or after 6 April 2009 will go to the county court instead of the High Ccourt instead of the High CourtCourt.

If one reads the comments on the Charleston Post and Courier's web site regarding the Judicial Merit Selection Commission's preliminary decision that Judge F.P. Segars - Andrews is unqualified to remain a family court judge because of her handling of a divorce case in which there was a business relationship between her husband's law partner and one -LSB-...]

Jurisdiction over Family Affairs Cases The Family Court has a very broad jurisdiction encompassing all disputes and conflicts within the family as well as all related domestic affairs which are of legal signifiFamily Affairs Cases The Family Court has a very broad jurisdiction encompassing all disputes and conflicts within the family as well as all related domestic affairs which are of legal signifiFamily Court has a very broad jurisdiction encompassing all disputes and conflicts within the family as well as all related domestic affairs which are of legal signififamily as well as all related domestic affairs which are of legal significance.

The case involves a decision in which the English Court of Appeal sharply rejected the practice — adopted and developed in the Family Division over 25 years — of treating the assets of... [more]

She has appeared in the following reported cases: S v S [2017] EWHC 1298 (Fam) involving a fact - finding about allegations of grave harm to the mother and the child and evidence from experts in Iranian family law; and Re: Rodwell [2016] EWHC 1731 (Fam), which centred on questions about whether the court had jurisdiction to make orders concerning the family.

Maybe I'm cynical, but when the December 2014 roster listed Ricigliano v. Ricigliano as a case in which the issue was whether the family court erred in failing to award a husband permanent periodic alimony I figured the South Carolina appellate courts had finally found a case in which they would approve an award of rehabilitative alimony.

In the case of court procedure — which is under review here — rule - making powers are delegated by Parliament to the Family Procedure Rule Committee (Courts Act 2003, ss 75 and 76).

It gives rise to questions of how can cases of complex inquiry best be handled by family courts in a way which parties feel is as fair as possible.

All county court cases (there was no family court then) save to deal with an issue not decided at higher level which affects decisions at county court level.

There are two neutral citation sources for first instance family judgments below the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal (each of which report their own family cases): judgements of Family Division judges (EWHC (Fam)-RRB- and of other family court cases (family judgments below the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal (each of which report their own family cases): judgements of Family Division judges (EWHC (Fam)-RRB- and of other family court cases (ECourt and Court of Appeal (each of which report their own family cases): judgements of Family Division judges (EWHC (Fam)-RRB- and of other family court cases (ECourt of Appeal (each of which report their own family cases): judgements of Family Division judges (EWHC (Fam)-RRB- and of other family court cases (family cases): judgements of Family Division judges (EWHC (Fam)-RRB- and of other family court cases (Family Division judges (EWHC (Fam)-RRB- and of other family court cases (family court cases (Ecourt cases (EWFC).

The Institute of Family Law Arbitrators has a clearly defined process, which is endorsed by the courts in S v S [2014] EWHC 7 (Fam), [2014] All ER (D) 63 (Jan) as leading to a binding court order in almost all cases.

South Carolina Code § 63-3-810 (A)(1) allows the family court to appoint a guardian ad litem in a private custody case when «without a guardian ad litem, the court will likely not be fully informed about the facts of the case and there is a substantial dispute which necessitates a guardian ad litem.»

Common law couples, in jurisdictions in which there is no unified family court, would apply to the provincial court in order to have their case heard.

By then it is typically difficult if not impossible to obtain the requested relief until trial (or to settle the case on favorable terms until trial is imminent)-- and it takes substantial time and expense to prepare a family court lawsuit to the point in which trial is imminent.

Curran Law Office tried a case before the Juneau County Circuit Court (Judge Evenson) which resulted in the Court unequally dividing the marital estate in favor of the firm's client, allowing our client to retain a full interest in a family farm in Elroy.

A few of the new attorneys in my suite asked for my views on forgoing initial retainers in family court cases in which one might expect to be awarded attorneys fees from the other side at the temporary hearing.

Family law cases are usually reserved for state court, but increasingly, the federal courts have been used to decide child abduction cases, that is, whether the child should be returned to the country of habitual residence (see Habitual Residence), but not to decide which party wins custody.

Specifically, the Tribunal held that the test for discrimination was the same in all cases and expressly rejected the family status test set out by the Federal Court of Appeal in Johnstone, which it viewed as creating a higher standard for family status claims than cases based on other forms of discrimination.

In cases in which the opposing party has sought fees, the family court has uniformly required disclosure of billing records when that party has refused to provide me such records upon a claim of privilege.

• a 30 % increase across all family court cases (including those that remain eligible for civil legal aid) in which neither party had legal representation;