Sentences with phrase «which granted review»

Neighborhood Centers appealed that decision to the Texas Supreme Court, which granted review.

Not exact matches

Two federal bills introduced last year, which would create a grant program to help states introduce or improve review committees, remain stalled in committee.

Not only did the FDA accept Spark's application — it granted it a «priority review» status which shaves four months off of its regulatory review period for the drug.

The CFTC's grant of temporary registration will be followed by a CFTC review of the LedgerX submission for listing options on Bitcoin as a product for trading on the SEF, which also requires CFTC approval.

Similarly, Purple Design was briefed by William Grant & Sons to review assets for its Glenfiddich brand, refine them and create a holistic brand world which would maintain its market - leading position and ensure consistency in the way the brand is presented across manifest media.

The eventual granting of the funds took considerable time for Nill to write a grant application and then go through the process which includes review and vetting by city staff, various application training and work sessions and a final vote by the city council on all applications.

In my review of the show, I'd criticized Jamie Oliver in a big way for failing to tell viewers that Carpinteria High, the school he held up as a model for excellent food (and it did look fantastic, no question about it), was the recipient of a generous grant from the Orfalea Foundation which assisted with staff training, the purchase of kitchen equipment and the planting and maintenance of the school garden.

By submitting an Entry, each Participant (whether declared a Winner or not) agrees (and agrees to affirm such in writing) to (i) abide by and be bound by these Official Rules and the decisions of DeliciousBaby on all matters relating to this Giveaway which decisions are final and binding in all respects, (ii) waive any right to claim ambiguity in the Giveaway or these Official Rules, (iii) forever and irrevocably release, discharge, indemnify and hold harmless the Giveaway Entities, and each of their respective officers, directors, licensors, employees, representatives and agents (collectively, the «Released Parties») from any liability, claims, demands, and cause of action from personal injury, loss or damage, including death, or property damage, theft, or loss suffered or resulting in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, from participation in this Giveaway or the use, misuse or acceptance or possession of the Prize or any portion thereof, or participation in any Giveaway - related activity; (iv) grant DeliciousBaby (where permitted by law) the right to use their name on a worldwide basis, in all forms of media, in perpetuity without review or further compensation and, (v) warrant and represent that the use of the materials submitted in this Giveaway will not violate the rights of any third parties.

The Park District has a 99 - year lease with the city for the 60 acres, which includes Sportsman's Park and the Garden Plots, granting the city the right to review «major changes» to the property.

These are expected to include measures to give neighbourhoods control over local planning decisions and reducing local authorities» reliance on grants from central government - which are being cut back dramatically as a result of the spending review.

Unison was granted a judicial review in July 2013, which was dismissed.

Lawyers of Woyome filed two applications at the Supreme Court praying the court to review the ruling which granted Martin Amidu the permission to orally examine their client a week ago.

The Legislature passed an amendment to HCRA that granted the leaders of each house the ability to spend up to $ 8.5 million on discretionary grants, none of which had to be disclosed or explained or go through a review process in the state's budget.

Cases that may have previously been automatically placed on the Supreme Court's docket by appeals or writs of error could now be reviewed on a writ of certoriari, which could be granted or denied at the court's discretion.

The two will appear in the campaign's only face - to - face debate, sponsored by the Times / Review Newsgroup, at Martha Clara Vineyards on Sound Avenue in Riverhead on Monday, Jan. 7 at 7 p.m. Doors open at 6:30 p.m. for the debate, which will be moderated by Times / Review executive editor Grant Parpan.

AAAS provided 42 reviews for proposals submitted to the Nebraska EPSCoR Faculty FIRST Awards initiative, which is designed to help early career faculty initiate their research programs and compete more effectively for NSF CAREER grants.

This is an open scheme in which national funding agencies, on a voluntary basis, come together to support a priority topic through a joint Call and Programme specification and a single international peer - review process, but with the grants being implemented at the national level.

In particular, the researchers want the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) to reinstate face - to - face meetings of peer review panels, which the agency has ended in favor of an on - line system for evaluating grant proposals.

He also attacked the peer review process the NSF used to award grants, saying it was too secretive and «incestuous,» which was leading to funding irrelevant projects.

Floyd Wormley Jr., a microbiologist at the University of Texas, San Antonio, serves as a standing member on NIH's AIDS - associated Opportunistic Infections and Cancer study section, which reviews grant proposals on that topic, scores them, and forwards the best ones to the appropriate NIH institutes for the final funding decision.

Most universities are now moving toward establishing a minimum stipend level for postdocs, which is reviewed annually and takes into account the recommended stipends set by federal granting agencies.

Witt - Enderby is on the grant review panel for the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer charity, which is placing greater emphasis on translational research, and a corresponding increase in suitable bids.

In addition, Shah might be able focus USDA on funding peer - reviewed, competitive research; the Gates Foundation is known for the rigor with which it reviews its grant applications.

Instead of grant proposals, he focused on manuscript reviews, particularly inept manuscript reviews — which, in his interdisciplinary field, apparently are not uncommon.

In particular, the researchers want the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) to reinstate face - to - face meetings of peer - review panels, which the agency has ended in favor of an online system for evaluating grant proposals.

Annual or semiannual grant deadlines lead to enormous spikes in submissions, which in turn cause headaches for the program managers who have to organize merit review panels.

Especially chilling is the YouCut Citizen Review, in which the public is being asked to search NSF grants to highlight projects «that you don't think are a good use of taxpayer dollars».

As Science Careers has reported, National Institutes of Health (NIH) and National Science Foundation peer - review panel meetings are on hold, which will delay the review of grant proposals.

Among the most common forms is peer review — of grant proposals, manuscripts, tenure dossiers — which most would agree is among a scientist's most sacred obligations.

The panel found that the existing grant review process, in which NHP studies undergo extra scrutiny by NC3Rs, generally works: Most research was justified in its use of NHPs and led to peer - reviewed publications.

However, hESC grants just beginning the peer - review process probably can't be paid until next fiscal year, which begins 1 October.

It's the first stop for any grant application; indeed, your grant application will be reviewed for scientific merit entirely within the CSR, regardless of which institute ultimately funds (or decides not to fund) your research project.

It's the first stop for any grant application; indeed, usually your grant application will be reviewed for scientific merit entirely within CSR, regardless of which institute ultimately funds (or decides not to fund) your research project.

One way, Tilghman said, would be for NIH to shift funding from R01 research grants, which currently support the majority of graduate students in biomedical sciences, to NIH training grants, which are peer - reviewed by NIH for their training - related virtues.

In July 2014, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted CTL019 its Breakthrough Therapy designation for the treatment of relapsed and refractory adult and pediatric ALL, a step which is intended to expedite the development and review of new medicines that treat serious or life - threatening conditions, if a therapy has demonstrated substantial advantages over available treatments.

As an example, he described the review that one of his proposed H5N1 grant proposals, which aimed to increase the virus's transmissibility in ferrets, underwent after peer review.

Institutional Review Board approval and written consent were obtained for the study, which was funded by an investigator - initiated grant from Endo Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: ENDP).

Section 7008 of the America COMPETES (Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education, and Science) Act, which President George W. Bush signed into law on 9 August, requires all proposals for NSF grants that will support postdocs to «include a description of the mentoring activities that will be provided... under the Foundation's broader impacts merit review criterion.

Instead of a completely online system, CIHR will implement a «hybrid» peer - review system, in which the online system will remove approximately 60 % of grants from consideration.

[4] CIHR continues to work on issues regarding the size and membership of the expert panels, the use of teleconferencing in early stage review, and the algorithms used to match applications to reviewers, issues which will need to be resolved prior to the next competition for both «Foundation» and «Project» grants, scheduled for fall 2016.

Sponsored submissions are not individually evaluated at the MMRRC's Strain Reviews and are not required to meet the same standards for scientific value required of unfunded submissions which are preserved using DPCPSI's MMRRC grant funding.

The treatment was granted priority review based on results of the phase II JULIET trial, which was presented at the 59th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition.

His work concentrates on mitochondrial dysfunction in metabolic, cardiovascular and neurological diseases, which is reflected in > 170 peer - reviewed papers and supportive grants.

Lorsch reviewed the new NIH policy called Grant Support Index (GSI), which aims to more widely distribute taxpayer funding of science by limiting additional grant support for already well - supported principal investigaGrant Support Index (GSI), which aims to more widely distribute taxpayer funding of science by limiting additional grant support for already well - supported principal investigagrant support for already well - supported principal investigators.

In 1996, in response to these concerns, Varmus, then director of NIH, impaneled a group of experienced clinical investigators and academic health center administrators to make recommendations that might guide the NIH toward policy changes to alleviate the concerns in the clinical research community.14 Several of the panel's recommendations have been implemented, including increased support of the General Clinical Research Center budget, expanded support of training in clinical research, and the establishment of NIH - sponsored educational debt relief programs for clinical investigators.15 - 18 The panel also recommended restructuring of NIH peer review groups so that patient - oriented grant applications would be evaluated by study sections in which at least half the grant applications involve patient - oriented research.

As you may know, the lion's share of medical research funding in the U.S.A. comes from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which is a government organization that reviews grant applications from scientists around the country and around the world and provides research funding for the best of those projects.

However, larger projects necessitating more extensive CPU time will likely require an additional separate allocation through DOE / ASCR, which can be granted via a secondary review process.

Grant Alan Show (born February 27, 1962) is an American actor best known for his role on Melrose Place as Jake Hanson, which he played from 1992 to 1997 Read our review to discover a top internet dating website for people across the world to meet singles online for casual and serious relationships.

That's the quandary facing the Department of Education, which is reviewing why many eligible students seem not to have taken advantage of two new federal grant programs that help high - performing students from low - income backgrounds pay for college.

This is in contrast to the current modus operandi in which applications for research grants can take a year or more to make their way through the review system and are typically for multiyear projects.