Sentences with phrase «which gun the casing»

This is done so that when the gun is fired, this specific engraving is imprinted onto the casing, identifying which gun the casing came... Read more

This is done so that when the gun is fired, this specific engraving is imprinted onto the casing, identifying which gun the casing came from.

Not exact matches

When you have these kinds of price hikes, which in some cases I believe are just simply criminal and they are done because of greed, it's like putting a gun to somebody's head and saying you need to pay me this very high price for the drug or you die.

«But this (law) in any case is a gun which will be hanging on the wall and can shoot someday,» the source said.

No one has been arrested in the burglary, one of several cases in recent years in which Bay Area law enforcement officers lost guns to thieves and which have prompted legislators to push for tougher requirements for securing weapons.

Gun - rights organizations also weighed in, including the National Rifle Association, which argued that the case stood to «eviscerate» the gun companies» legal protections.

In the article, the MSM propagandist states such things as: 2017 has seen, according to his one time Goldman Sachs source, a «dramatic crash in [physical gold coin] demand,» that interest in gold coins is linked to «political conservatism, or anarcho - libertarianism» and «end of the world right wing sentiments,» that gold has been implicated in a «conspiracy to commit money laundering,» that gold is «financed by people in the narcotics trade,» that it comes from «illegal mines and drug dealers in Peru, Bolivia and Ecuador,» that «the federal authorities assume the NTR Metals [case] represented only a fraction of illegally sourced and financed gold,» that therefore the US attorney is broadly investigating the gold industry, that gold is «produced by exploited workers,» that «crude [gold] extraction techniques create serious and lasting environmental damage,» that gold plays an important part in «tax evasion,» that it is related to American gun sales, which the author abhors; that «drug dealers [use] gold imports as a way of laundering their proceeds,» and that «they came to realize that illegal gold [is] an intrinsically better business» than drug dealing; to name but a few of the aspersions cast against gold in the short article.

The documents, which are part of Cruz's criminal case in the shooting, show that he had written the word «kill» in a notebook, told a classmate that he wanted to buy a gun and use it, and had cut his arm supposedly in anger because he had broken up with a girlfriend.

In some cases, gun control polled better after Parkland than it did in the aftermath of the Las Vegas mass shooting in October 2017, which killed 58 people, the deadliest mass shooting in post-World War II American history.

That allowed the NCR's guns to be turned on to an even larger target: «The cover - up is the product of secrecy, privilege and a lack of accountability that are major elements of the clerical culture in which the sex abuse scandal flourished... It was made worse because officials either ignored or downplayed the claims of victims and went to great lengths in many cases to protect the abusers.»

More recently, it has been a case of incompetence in the defensive side of our game, we've tried to take the game to Chelsea and go guns blazing which put us at danger every time we lost the ball on the counter attack especially as we used to play a ridiculously high line.

Clashes there get renewed once the dusk - to - dawn curfew is relaxed, which happened in the case of this week's gun attack.

Sneaking a gun into a country is easy if you have diplomats with diplomatic immunity doing it for you, as the perpetrators in these cases could have if they wished, and there are plenty of ways that a trained professional can kill someone with a firearm for which a subsequent medical diagnosis is irrelevant.

The holding in each case was substantively similar as McDonald primarily served to incorporate the 2nd Amendment via the 14th Amendment (since Heller applied to the District of Columbia only which is governed by the federal government directly) to the states and did not really set new gun ownership precedent.

This case has attracted the attention of virtually every major gun control and gun rights organization in the nation, many of which have filed briefs either in support of or against the original suit filed by the New York State Rife & Pistol Association.

Thornton said she understood and supported people's right to have guns for the protection of their homes and families, but she believed the sheriff's statement could be construed as encouraging people to get involved in cases in which they might as easily become victims.

In a discussion I had recently about gun rights, someone brought up a United States Supreme Court case in which it was determined that an individual could become disqualified from particular rights.

Cuomo, who supports the microstamping of bullet casings, wouldn't say which gun control measures he would push for on the state level in a news conference earlier today, though he called a provision in the state's ban on assault weapons that grandfathers in high - capacity ammunition magazines manufactured before the ban took effect a loophole in the law.

The question came up this week in the case of former Solvay police officer Curt Francemone who faces a second - degree harassment charge after a bar fight in which he pointed a gun at a person.

This stamps an impression of the breech face into the soft metal at the base of the cartridge case, which is then ejected from the gun.

Which case better represents the reality of owning a gun?

In one US case, 17 - year - old Osiris Aristy was charged under antiterrorism laws for a Facebook post in which gun emojis were placed next to a police officer emoji.

«Now,» in this case, being March 16, 2018, which Variety is reporting as the release date for the latest cinematic adventure of gun - toting archaeologist Lara Croft.

Working for the organization, he served as a hired gun stepping into high profile cases in which the NAACP believed that black suspects had been wrongly accused.

In fact Just Cause 2 debatably only really came alive when not taking part in formal missions, which are by most accounts rinse and repeat, «fetch this case filled with guns», «shoot this nasty person», «blow up this base», pro-forma mayhem which doesn't always satisfy.

The only problem is that America is still in the process of a widespread national debate about gun control, so when absolutely nothing is made of the case at the heart of the story to make room for the chases and behind - closed - doors intrigue, the issue becomes a mere afterthought, which Runaway Jury indifferently exploits for the purpose of escapism.

In reality, hunter - gatherers were unbelievably skilled (a point also made by Jared Diamond in his classic Guns, Germs and Steel, in which, if I recollect correctly, he makes a compelling case that as a result of natural selection and their environment, the indigenous people of Papua New Guinea are, on average, more intelligent than so called «first world *» inhabitants).

If that's the case — maybe Bungie is taking the Killzone 2 theory, which is; the player sees the gun the most while experiencing the game — why not make the weapon the most detailed thing inside the videogame.

That's namely the case when it's too far from the gun to win a draw (which was all the time for me).

So, use the trickster approach or stun guns in these scenarios as killing people in such cases will lead to serious trouble which you, as a beginner, can not handle.

If anything, it is commodity capitalism which «put a gun to the head» of the world and continues to do so, in every case AGAINST what would demonstrably be the democratic outcome, if democracy was allowed to function.

Rather than provide any real smoking gun evidence to the case, this last citation of Oreskes only begs for a pair of really troubling questions: are the lawyers for the San Mateo / Marin / Imperial Beach plaintiffs committing legal profession suicidal by citing evidence which is not available to read?

The surprise to me with this lawsuit is that it doesn't feature sensational evidence like others did — the older Kivalina v Exxon case and the newer San Mateo / Marin / Imperial Beach v. Chevron cases — by citing the infamous «leaked memo set» headlined with «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact,» which are universally accepted among enviro - activists as smoking gun evidence of skeptic climate scientists being paid to push misinformation to the public at the behest of sinister corporate handlers.

All three cases, like Raich, involve the intrastate production or possession of materials for which there is a national market (machine guns and child pornography).

As some may recall (and as detailed in posts here and here), Cavera is the fascinating case in which Judge Sifton decided to enhance a sentence above the guideline range in a gun case because he viewed gun possession in urban spots like NYC to be especially bad.

Depending upon the particular campaign finance law involved, which isn't clearly specified, there might be a criminal penalty (either a misdemeanor or a minor felony) as well, which could give rise to a probation sentence, a sentence to some period of incarceration, a period of post-release parole, criminal fines, court costs, and, at least in the case of a felony, some collateral consequences of that conviction such as a prohibition on owning a gun and ineligibility for many occupations and jobs.

TupperS assembled a small team of three people and went up against the Law Society's big guns, which included Norton Rose Fulbright's competition team, a QC plus juniors and RBB Economics, successfully arguing and winning the case in under a year.

In many cases it will be unclear who owned or possessed the gun which is the subject of the charge.

For example if a Chicago police officer breaks his hand and then loses hand function because it was improperly set they may have a medical malpractice case because they have an inability to fire their gun which is an essential task of their job.

The plaintiff in this case, Sharon P., was attacked and sexually assaulted at gun point in the subterranean parking garage of the office building in which she worked.