Sentences with phrase «which immigration judges»

The judgment in AG (Eritrea), handed down on 31 July 2007, is the most recent Court of Appeal decision to give detailed consideration to the approach which immigration judges should take in relation to proportionality under Art 8 of the Convention.

Not exact matches

Labour, which usually attacks from the right when it comes to immigration, also criticised the vans, with shadow immigration minister Chris Bryant branding them «ill - judged».

They have also introduced new categories, 9 honoree and 18 categories subjected to 45 % public vote and 55 % reserved for selected judges» votes which will be composed of renowned experts in the field of immigration, economics, information and law.

The immigration activist Ravi Ragbir's delayed deportation case is one of a growing number in which federal judges have ruled to halt both individual and mass deportations.

As far as they are concerned those evils involve foreign rapists who can't be deported and terror suspects who can't sent home, which means they will be able to bang a populist drum on crime and immigration while blaming foreign European judges — all in one hit.

«Judges haven't been able to understand why the Home Office has continued to use the Danish report because there are so many criticisms of it,» says Nathan Stevens, an immigration consultant for Duncan Lewis Solicitors, which has worked on ten cases since the changes came in last year.

Under the new legislation, which Mayor Bill de Blasio has said he supports, the city will honor immigration waivers if the federal government requests them with a judge's warrant — and even then, only if the subject of the warrant was convicted within the last five years of a violent or serious crime, or is a possible match on the terrorism watch list.

Federal judge Mariana Pfaelzer issued a permanent injunction against the vast majority of the people of CA by striking down proposition 187, which stated that illegal immigrants were not eligible for CA taxpayer provided «entitlements» because it interfered with the the right of the federal government to regulate immigration -LRB-!)

The Trump administration's crackdown on illegal immigration extends to increased opposition to administrative case closures in which judges indefinitely pause lower - priority deportation cases.

Since 2002, he has also been sitting part - time as an Immigration Judge at the First Tier Tribunal, Immigration and Asylum Chamber, which gives him unparalleled expertise.

Unlike an ordinary marriage, which is presumed to be valid and in good faith, marriages which afford a spouse the right to immigrate to the U.S. and in due course, to become a U.S. citizen if certain other requirements are met, are carefully scrutinized for signs that it is a «sham marriage» and immigration judges can be quite skeptical in determining whether or not a marriage is a sham.

Where the issues before the court are between citizens this may not matter; but where the issues are between the citizen and departments of state or citizens and local authorities — immigration, social security, planning permission — there must surely be some concern that the judge will not want to let down the political party which got him, or her, elected and whose support may be needed for re-election and promotion.

Immigration minister, Damian Green says: «This is another very disappointing judgment, which overturns a policy that exists and is judged to be consistent with the ECHR in other European countries.

In a post where he appears to reveal more than his opinion of the numbers, Volokh writes, «This isn't some liberal judge on the Ninth Circuit slamming the immigration bureaucracy — it's a moderate conservative, citing many opinions from the Seventh Circuit (which has a reputation as being pretty sane).