Sentences with phrase «which kind of statements»

Take a look at a resume format for a camera operator and see which kind of statements can impress the prospective employer!

Not exact matches

In a controversial statement this week, President Donald Trump highlighted Norway as the kind of country from which he'd like more emigrants to the United States.
The event, which was founded by the 92nd Street Y, doesn't have a specific policy on donor premiums, it said in a statement:» #GivingTuesday is an open - source movement, and we encourage organizations and individuals around the world to come up with all kinds of creative ways to do fundraising.»
Outlined in the documents are rules about what kinds of statements are considered too offensive to allow, how much violence the site allows in videos — including Facebook Live, which has been the subject of significant controversy recently — and what to do with sexually suggestive imagery.
«We have long been concerned about the possibility of this kind of snooping, which is why we have continued to extend encryption across more and more Google services and links,» Mr. Drummond said in a statement.
So, for one thing, he talks about how to value the investment portfolio of another company and how that is measured how that is accounting for their financial statements which are by the way different the kind of rules that you use today.
Stephen Toulmin echoes these sentiments in an elegant statement on the cosmos understood on the model of our «home»: «We can do our best to build up a conception of the «overall scheme of things» which draws as heavily as it can on the results of scientific study, informed by a genuine piety in all its attitudes toward creatures of other kinds: a piety that goes beyond the consideration of their usefulness to Humanity as instructions for the fulfillment of human ends.
The questions of a doctrinal and historical kind which are raised become more and more complicated and more difficult of access for a simple, universally intelligible official statement of the Church.
If we were to apply the normal standards by which one evaluates the credibility of such statements — i.e. what kind of track record does this person have for his predictions?
(As Joshua Reynolds put it in the eighteenth century, «There is no expedient to which a man will not resort to avoid the real labor of thinking») However, we can keep this problem from getting out of hand if we remember that different kinds of statements are verified in different ways.
It is logic, not process philosophy, which insists that one can not both describe Jesus as a man and also say that God's indwelling in him differs in kind from his indwelling in other men: since a study of the raw material confirms the first statement, logic demands a modification of the second.
In fact, Scalfari and the pope have had these kinds of sort - of on - the - record conversations five times in recent years, several of which prompted the Vatican to release similar statements, (that is, despite the Vatican saying «without however giving him any interviews» in their recent statement).
Niebuhr's statement implies no relativism, in which somehow everything is true, but rather a kind of believing agnosticism, in which there is no claim to know what else is true or false besides one's own belief.
It makes the statement more precise by indicating that this procreation belongs to that kind of created efficient causality in which the agent by virtue of divine causality essentially exceeds the limits set by his own essence.
In view of earlier prophetic castigations of pride, this kind of protest of prophetic virtue becomes its own denial; and in the next line the code which the speaker thought to uphold is brutally shattered in one of the most arrogant statements in the Old Testament:
In a much less blunt statement, which nevertheless is not so clear, the student is encouraged to find the kind of profession to which he can give himself wholeheartedly from internal and not external motivation.
Having seen the kind of statements about God which appear objectionable, and having seen how historical understanding enables us to see positive merit in them, we must still face the question, What shall we do with these ideas today?
For on his own principles if there were not some kind of awareness of causal efficacy, there would be no warrant for making statements about it: «Nothing is to be received into the philosophical scheme which is not discoverable as an element in subjective experience» (PR 166/253).
Clearly, the thinking which produced this kind of theological statement is very different indeed from that which finds expression in the Lord's Prayer (though it is worth noticing that the context of both is, up to a point, similar: «When you pray, say «Father.»»
And the Christian gospel, while in itself given once - for - all — since it centers in the life of Jesus Christ and in his abiding significance — is capable of application to all kinds of situations in all kinds of cultures; it is capable of statement, theologically speaking, in many different forms and in most diverse idiom, without any damage to the declaration which it makes.
He has the following statement taped to a wall in his Rams Park cubicle, just outside offensive coordinator Jerry Rhome's office: «The best kind of pride is that which compels a man to do his very best when no one is watching.»
Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
I / we agree that if any material change (s) occur (s) in my / our financial condition that I / we will immediately notify BSHFC of said change (s) and unless Baby Safe Homes Franchise Corporation is so notified it may continue to rely upon the application and financial statement and the representations made herein as a true and accurate statement of my / our financial condition.nI / we authorize Baby Safe Homes Franchise Corporation to make whatever credit inquiries / background checks it deems necessary in connection with this application and financial statement.nI / we authorize and instruct any person or consumer reporting agency to furnish to BSHFC any information that it may have to obtain in response to such credit inquiries.nIn consideration of the ongoing association between Baby Safe Homes and the undersigned applicant (hereinafter u201cApplicantu201d), the parties hereto have entered into this Non-Disclosure and Non-Competition Agreement.nWHEREAS, in the course of its business operations, Baby Safe Homes provides its customers products and services which, by nature of the business, include trade secrets, confidential and proprietary information, and other matters deemed material or important enough to warrant protection; and WHEREAS, Applicant, by reason of his / her interest in Baby Safe Homes and in the course of his / her duties, has access to said secrets and confidential information; and WHEREAS, Baby Safe Homes has trade secrets and other confidential and proprietary information, including procedures, customer lists, and particular desires or needs of such customers to which Applicant has access in the course of his / her duties as an Applicant.nNow, therefore, in consideration of the premises contained herein, the parties agree as follows Applicant shall not, either during the time of his / her franchise evaluation with Baby Safe Homes or at any time thereafter either directly or indirectly, communicate, disclose, reveal, or otherwise use for his / her own benefit or the benefit of any other person or entity, any trade secrets or other confidential or proprietary information obtained by Employee by virtue of his / her employment with Baby Safe Homes, in any manner whatsoever, any such information of any kind, nature, or description concerning any matters affecting or relating to the Baby Safe Homes business, or in the business of any of its customers or prospective customers, except as required in the course of his / her employment by Baby Safe Homes or except as expressly authorized Baby Safe Homes Franchise Corporation, in writing.nDuring any period of evaluation with Baby Safe Homes, and for two (2) years thereafter, Applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, induce or influence, divert or take away, or attempt to divert or take away and, during the stated period following termination of employment, call upon or solicit, or attempt to call upon or solicit, any of the customers or patrons Baby Safe Homes including, but not limited to, those upon whom he / she was directly involved, or called upon, or catered to, or with whom became acquainted while engaged in the franchise evaluation process of a Baby Safe Homes franchise business.
In a statement trumpeting her Corbynite credentials, she declared: «Jeremy Corbyn has opened the door to a new kind of Labour party, one which sticks to its principles, opposes neoliberalism and utilises the knowledge and experience of its members.»
«The further suggestions in Lord Carey's statement that recent court judgments which have not upheld claims of unlawful discrimination against Christians in the workplace are a threat to the social order and a step away from barring Christians from any employment is scaremongering, and a desperate cry from those unrepresentative few who are trying to retain the kind of privileges for religion that have no place in our society.»
He said it was clear that the kind of disdain for human life which the PDP exhibited in its incautious statement is the same reason the girls were kidnapped in the first instance, and for which then PDP - controlled Federal Government took what seemed an eternity before even acknowledging the abduction — thus losing critical time for their rescue.
A statement issued yesterday indicated that Gordon Brown took the view that there was «no place in politics» for the dissemination of the kind of material with which Mr McBride was involved.
You mention some of the leading Medical doctors who have provided «medical evidence» to this fact... Sorry, but I advise everyone to run from this kind of article and to go to professionals who provide medical research facts (i.e. Dr Gregor) vs making statements that will cause consumers to say «I read it is now OK to eat more fats and not be as concerned on a low fat diet»... Heart Disease is the number one killing disease in this country and this article certainly will provide more reasons for consumers to eat more fats which will continue that trend....
By now, you've probably all noticed I have a major soft spot for all kinds of dresses — some more statement than others — a lot of which, have been with me for years (a sign of a great dress!).
I'm totally crushing on the white (which is kind of anti-Vahni), but curiously, it makes a powerful statement, don't you think?
Not sure why brights appeal more to me... Maybe I feel that wearing tartan equals creating some kind of a statement - look... which is of course not at all necessary.
Haha, totally with you on the fur slippers — they're very much a «love or hate» kind of statement, which is always needed for something to go down in fashion history!
Yet her words of wisdom could almost stand as a mission statement for the film itself, which firmly sets out to be an even kinder and politer affair than its predecessor: a film that, for all its sweetness, still managed to spawn a «creepy Paddington» meme, while the BBFC forewarned consumers of its «dangerous behaviour, mild threat and innuendo».
The greatest revelation in this title is best explored in the first arc — which acts as a kind of thesis statement for the rest of the series — when Doreen Green is tasked with stopping Galactus from eating the Earth.
Whether you require help with a school article or master's level college personal statement, our master writing teachers can help guarantee that your affirmations paper imparts the one of kind courses in which you will add to the school group.
Amazon has recently issued a statement in which it has said that people using Amazon Echo and similar kind of devices will be able to send free text messages or make audio and video calls to others.
This summer, Nelson posted an article headlined Like Finding Loose Change In The Sofa — Kind Of, in which she wrote of requisitioning a royalty statement from an Australian house for a client becausOf, in which she wrote of requisitioning a royalty statement from an Australian house for a client becausof requisitioning a royalty statement from an Australian house for a client because:
With year - end rapidly approaching, many investors have been going through their financial statements and slips to see what kind of investment or investment - related expenses they've paid through the year, and which ones might be deductible on their personal tax returns.
(I wrote my own program in Excel which is alright, but it relies solely on the statements so that makes it kind of unreliable).
And in the fullness of time, as we have now come to realize, Toyota stock has gone up a lot from that standpoint, and investors, which properly explains the kind of results we've managed to have in our mutual funds that Consuela referenced, is because a patient investor with the contrarian value mindset I've talked about, as long as you're buying the stocks on sale and not those that are offered on clearance, i.e., which nobody else wants ever — so we don't believe in distressed investing or deep value investing, we're talking about quality companies that are available on sale — you can make what I'm going to call performance statements in your portfolios, as opposed to what I'm going to describe what a lot of investors try to make, which is fashion statements.
Bosses released a statement last week in which they described it as inevitable that a game about DJing wouldn't have the same kind of appeal - right from the outset at least - as a title like Guitar Hero.
And then you allow your statement to be on the tree — which is a kind of exposure — along with other wishes.
Another word by Douglas Huebler seems appropriate, especially in relation to another kind of tautological piece from 1971, in which the title is the statement we are reading in relation to what we are asked to do: «The point represented above exactly at the instant that it is so perceived establishes an authentic triangulation.»
Whether purposeful, or merely due to careless writing, this kind of statement casts the science (and the opinion of scientists) as far more uncertain that it is in reality — in this case implying that there is doubt that CO2 levels are increasing, something which actually has zero uncertainty.
I simply don't have the copious free time it takes to keep pointing out (a) that the poster has superseded the abstract and (b) an extrapolation is not a forecast, nor a projection, a prediction, a prophesy, nor any other kind of statement about a future real world, only about a future mathematical world which need bear no relationship to reality (as is often the case about mathematical worlds).
Judith Curry's statement is exactly the kind of ill - thought - out or not - at - all - thought - out rambling which is an embarrassment to her, and an embarrassment to science itself.
Their own Dogmatic Postulation of CO2CAGW «tenets», which in effect constitute an instant litmus test for defining Believers as against «deniers», and their incessant repetition of statements which publicly preach a Liturgy involving a coming Apocalypse, both contribute to bringing their Ideology very close to constituting at least some kind of Religion.
Just by way of example, whether or not this agrees with or differs from the statement from Wolters Kluwer, from the video cited above, in which, perhaps supporting their statement that they don't have to create new content, it is said «we now have more software engineers at Wolters Kluwer than we have editors and in our world editors were kind of the kings of the kingdom, certainly for many years», might make for debate.
There is absolutely nothing in Rita that compels a sentencing judge who wants to treat the Guidelines as mandatory to really consider the 3553 (a) factors, so long as he gives some kind of lip service to «having listened to the arguments» (which is what I read Rita as basically requiring, if that much, in terms of a judicial statement).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z