Sentences with phrase «which leading climate scientists»

Not exact matches

Central to the CRT will be the Climate Explorer which HabitatSeven will build in partnership with NOAA, NEMAC, and a team of leading climate scientists across federal agClimate Explorer which HabitatSeven will build in partnership with NOAA, NEMAC, and a team of leading climate scientists across federal agclimate scientists across federal agencies.

The evidence was murky: more than 1,000 e-mails and documents exchanged by leading climate scientists, which had been hacked from their computers.

While being publicized in the mainstream media certainly makes researchers a target, being picked up in the skeptic blogosphere, which includes widely read blogs such asWatts Up With That, Climate Audit and Morano's Climate Depot, can also lead to scientists receiving email barrages, even when, as in Norgaard's case, the research has not received mainstream media attention.

And while weather patterns can change from year to year, Lake Superior appears to be behaving in ways that, to scientists, indicate long - term climate change: Water temperatures are rising and evaporation is up, which leads to lower water levels in some seasons.

Flowers noted that climate change is exacerbating this issue, and cited an example of a good collaboration between scientists and the local community, which led to the documentation of five tropical parasites in Lowndes County.

The research, led by scientists at the University of Miami (UM) Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science and partners, has important implications for the long - term survival of coral reefs worldwide, which have been in worldwide decline from multiple stressors such as climate change and ocean pollution.

More than 30 scientists and forest managers contributed to the report, which is part of the Central Hardwoods Climate Change Response Framework, a collaboration of federal, state, academic and private partners led by the Forest Service's Northern Institute of Applied Climate Science (NIACS).

Deforestation may have far greater consequences for climate change in some soils than in others, according to new research led by Yale University scientists — a finding that could provide critical insights into which ecosystems must be managed with extra care because they are vulnerable to biodiversity loss and which ecosystems are more resilient to widespread tree removal.

ScienceInsider is closely following the data breach at a U.K. university, which led to the release of more than 1000 e-mails among prominent climate scientists.

Scientists use data from the SGP to learn about cloud, aerosol, and atmospheric processes, which in turn leads to improvements in models of the Earth's climate.

Conflicting research on the heating and cooling of Earth has led to a global temperature conundrum, which climate scientists plan to address this fall.

A team of scientists led by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory atmospheric researcher Dr. Susannah Burrows and collaborator Daniel McCoy, who studies clouds and climate at the University of Washington, reveal how tiny natural particles given off by marine organisms — airborne droplets and solid particles called aerosols — nearly double cloud droplet numbers in the summer, which boosts the amount of sunlight reflected back to space.

Dr. Elizabeth Mcleod (Reef Resilience Science Lead and Climate Adaptation Scientist, Asia Pacific) was instrumental in developing TNC's Reef Resilience toolkit and trainings which have trained nearly 1,500 reef managers in more than 75 countries on the best practices for addressing threats to coral reefs.

If climate change exceeds the temperature target, scientists warn, there is a greater risk that the world's ice sheets will be destabilized, leading to sharply rising seas, and increasing climate extremes such as droughts, heat waves and floods, which could pose daunting challenges for food and water availability for growing populations.

Until now, models have predicted something for the future... but it was something that seemed very distant,» said Oltmanns, the lead scientist behind the research, which was published this week in Nature Climate Change.

««The arid lands of southwestern North America will imminently become even more arid as a result of human - induced climate change just at the time that population growth is increasing demand for water, most of which is still used by agriculture,» said Richard Seager, Senior Research Scientist at the Lamont - Doherty Earth Observatory and one of the lead authors of the study.

Steve, aside from the fact that Climatology is not a «debate», so there are not 2 sides, the comment section posts here are NOT «the blog», that consists of the lead articles by the group of scientists known as «Real Climate», for which see the Contributors link, the comments are from folks like you and me, generally non-scientists with varied opinions and sometimes clashing personalities.

«Our study shows that very high climate sensitivities are virtually impossible, suggesting that we still have enough time to deal with the problem and reduce carbon emissions, which could avoid the most severe impacts,» said Andreas Schmittner, a climate scientist at Oregon State University and the study's lead author.

Researchers such as James Hansen, a leading climate scientist at NASA, believe that global warming is accelerating and may be approaching a tipping point, a point at which climate change acquires a momentum that makes it irreversible.

By contrast, I adopt a policy stance, not as a scientist but as someone who believes that the case for net benefits from GHG reductions has not been made and has led to a mis - use of resources which has weakened, and will further weaken, our capacity to respond to whatever climate changes emerge.

For good measure, Tunmore followed up with a blog post that same day in which she claimed that IPCC personnel are the «world's top climate scientists» and that the IPCC is the «world's leading authority on the science of climate change.»

On the bright side, while he took some predictable pot - shots (thanks to Mansbridge's feeding of very convenient questions) at critics, notwithstanding all the press he's received in which he's dubbed as «world's leading authority on climate change», he admitted that he's «not a climate scientist».

Scientists say the state's coral reef habitats are increasingly threatened by climate change as rising water temperatures lead to more coral bleaching, which occurs when the coral becomes stressed by changes in the environment.

Utah is among the nation's most dependent states on coal, which scientists consider a leading contributor to climate change.

This report will come from IPCC's Working Group 1, which is an update on the physical science of the climate change, compiled an synthesized by 258 leading climate scientists.

These lead to dozens of further NASA sites and hundreds of further scientific articles, of which a thorough, up - to - date, clear - written summary is provided by NASA scientist James Hansen's free - as - in - freedom survey Climate Sensitivity, Sea Level, and Atmospheric CO2

«I was forwarded the chain of e-mails on the 12th October, which are comments from some of the worlds leading climate scientists written as a direct result of my article «whatever happened to global warming».

The book â $ «which consists of comments by various leading climate scientists on what they think of Mann and his ludicrous stick â $ «dovetails nicely with my own intellectual path on this subject.

Among the contrarians affiliated with the site are Sallie Baliunas and Willie Soon, astronomers, lead authors of the recent «Harvard study» a survey of historical studies of climate which yields findings totally contrary to those reported by scientists who are actually qualified to study the topic.

A team of international scientists is due to set off for the world's biggest iceberg, fighting huge waves and the encroaching Antarctic winter, in a mission aiming to answer fundamental questions about the impact of climate change in the polar regions.The scientists, led by the British Antarctic Survey (BAS), are trying to reach a newly revealed ecosystem that had been hidden for 120,000 years below the Larsen C ice shelf on the Antarctic peninsula.In July last year, part of the Larsen C ice shelf calved away, forming a huge iceberg - A68 - which is four times bigger than London, and revealing life beneath for the first time.

Speaking of which, my attempt to participate in the RC forum with critical opinions has done nothing but reinforce my suspicion of leading climate scientists being ideologically biased.

The EPA cited a 2007 Supreme Court ruling declaring that carbon dioxide is a pollutant, subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act, but the science upon which that ruling was based has now been called into question when emails and internal documents between the UNâ $ ™ s leading climate change scientists were leaked to the public.

A rise of two degrees centigrade in global temperatures — the point considered to be the threshold for catastrophic climate change which will expose millions to drought, hunger and flooding — is now «very unlikely» to be avoided, the world's leading climate scientists said yesterday.

On Friday the IPCC, which represents the world's leading climate scientists, produced a landmark report on the state of knowledge of global warming.

In the discussion about whether the Earth has warmed the «climate scientists» seem to be completely unable to speak the truth because the truth casts doubts on the «CO2 is increasing and will lead to temperature increases which will be bad» theory.

Leading scientists associated with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) will be present at the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio +20), which takes place in Rio de Janeiro from 20 to 22 June, 2012, with preparatory meetings starting the previous week.

A recording of a phone conference call July 20, 2015, in which James E. Hansen of Columbia University (and formerly NASA's lead climate scientist) discussed a new discussion paper positing that abrupt sea level rise is a significant prospect with unabated greenhouse gas emissions.

In Chapter 7 of Requiem, I describe a conference I attended in Oxford in September 2009 at which many of the world's leading climate scientists discussed for the first time what a world at 4 °C would be like.

The biggest reason the public doesn't follow wherever the pro-AGW crowdd leads is because of Climategate, and the emails in which the climate scientists convict themselves of unscientific behavior and collusion and conspiracy, as well as cherry - picking and deceptive fudging of the data, as in «hide the decline.»

Now, see how Harvard History of Science professor Naomi Oreskes» inadvertently elicits that exact response from her audience, via her tale of the events which led her to explore the notion that skeptic climate scientists operate in a manner parallel to what «expert shills» did for the tobacco industry.

The Doha negotiations coincide with the annual meeting of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) in San Francisco, a five - day conference attended by 20,000 scientists, myself included, which provides a glimpse at the leading edge of climate research around the world.

In its report, Ford estimated that yearly greenhouse gas emissions from its vehicles and manufacturing plants totaled the equivalent of 400 million metric tons of carbon dioxide, which scientists have identified as one of the leading man - made causes of global climate change.

What I found in late 2009 almost always led me to myriad praise of Gelbspan as the discoverer of leaked industry memos containing the awkward «strategy» phrase «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact,» which proved skeptic climate scientists were on the payroll of «Big Coal & Oil.»

Susan was lead author of Impacts of A Warming Arctic, the synthesis report of the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment, published in 2004, on which she worked for four years with 300 scientists from the Arctic and beyond.

The occurrences discussed in this article are five of some 60 known weather - related phenomenon, which can lead to what climate scientist James Hansen has termed the «Venus Syndrome,» where oceans would boil and the surface temperature of earth could reach 462 degrees Celsius.

That's how I opened my April 25, 2014 post regarding his repeated overall tale of a) minding his own business, b) being contacted / approached by health / climate change article series writer Dr Paul Epstein, which, c) prompted him to co-author an article with Epstein, that, d) resulted in a backlash of letter - writers which e) is what led Gelbspan to look into the works of skeptic climate scientists, who, f) he learned / discovered / was tipped that they were «industry - corrupted.»

If you start out with «nobodys» pushing the industry accusation and never fix that problem, you increase the risk of the public not taking it seriously, which leads to the risk of the public looking more carefully at skeptic climate scientists» detail assessments.

LONDON, 26 April, 2017 — A leading climate scientist says claims that there has been a slowdown or hiatus in the rate at which global warming is happening are not supported by statistical evidence.

Susan is the lead author of Impacts of a Warming Arctic, the synthesis report of the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment on which she worked for four years with 300 scientists from the Arctic and beyond.

However, now that they are in the public domain, lawmakers have an obligation to determine the extent to which the so - called «consensus» of global warming, formed with billions of taxpayer dollars, was contrived in the biased minds of the world's leading climate scientists.»