Sentences with phrase «which means the same thing»

If you still don't get it, I'll still be in the Bible, they just won't call me «Christ», it will probably be the word «savior», which means the same thing.

Once you think of it as within, which means the same thing as in, and consider the level of knowledge the people had to understand God's word with, then science and religion can go hand and hand here, like the other science and archaeology discoveries mentioned above.

Some words in the English language can be spelled in more than one way — like «color» and «colour,» which mean the same thing.

He says «mechanical equilibrium», which means the same thing.

This is echoed in their greeting, «I see you,» a direct translation of the Sanskrit Namaste, which means the same thing.

Not exact matches

'» But she's on an H4 spousal visa, which, among other things, means she can't work and would face the same immigrant nightmare if she wants to start a business.

In this example, we're comparing two keywords that mean the same thing to see which one is more popular: «laptop» and «notebook».

I know which camp you fit into but I mean have you considered just trying to pick one specific thing and really going after it or this kind of words is based on maybe you've even getting bored of doing the same thing all the time?

In more recent years, I've repeatedly seen the encouragement and value women have found in discovering the same things: the relief that following Christ doesn't mean forcing themselves into a box labelled «womanhood», which narrowly defines the life they should lead and sometimes restricts their gifts and calling.

Either they necessitate a deceptive «God», e.g. creating starlight «in transit» which means that for some light the star that supposedly sent said light would never have actually existed, or they would cause effect that should be evident but are not, e.g. temporarily fast starlight would effectively cook many things, such as life on earth, if the required light (and attendant gamma radiation) were compressed into a significantly shorter time frame (think of the radiation from the apparent 13 billion years of the universe arriving at the same time, or even over a 1000 years).

I read that sentence as «I'm 20 and I was seeking for which religion God was real,» which meant almost the same thing, but with significant differences and implications.

To exalt them, including the most purely «religious» intuitions, to some kind of absolute status, or, which is to do the same thing, to assume that they are the means of access to the ultimate, is to be involved in ideology.

For the deposit itself of Faith, or the truths which are contained in our venerable doctrine, is one thing, and the way (modus) in which the same are set forth, with however the same sense and the same meaning, is another.

That was the dilemma after praying and seeking the Lord he shows me a couple of things one is God calls the shots not satan satans demons bow to Gods authority and must get his permission so they beg Jesus to send the demons into the pigs.Jesus allows it so we can see satans purpose is always to destroy life.God is still the same yesterday today and forever he is the giver of life.We do know that the pigs were owned by the gentile nations and may well have been offered or about to be offered to there gods which would mean they would belong to satan.Like the example Jesus said about taxes should he pay them and he said give to caesar what is caesars.Or the other option was that it showed Gods mercy to the man that had been healed by delivering him of the demons and he was also protecting the people in the area from the influence of the demons.So God is still the same he is unchangeable and definitely not bipolar.I would say if anyone was bipolar in this situation it is David and he like us struggled with the same choice to walk according to the flesh or walk according to the spirit of God.brentnz

In that spirit, then, Dionysius could affirm that love, as applied to the Godhead, «means a faculty of unifying and conjoining and of producing a special commingling together in the Beautiful and Good... and holds together things of the same order by a mutual connection, and moves the highest to take thought for those below and fixes the inferior in a state which seeks the higher.»

When we say that God «knows» something, «knowledge» can not mean the same thing as it does when we speak of human knowing, because the created order works within parameters given by the Creator — parameters within which the Creator can not be confined.

The ethical framework for biological science must be based on the same principles of truth and meaning by which we as Christians judge all things, material and spiritual.

Which means what we want and what God wants might not be the same thing... So our task is to figure out why we have the Bible we have, why God gave it to us, and then align our understand of the text with this.

Sure, calling people out of the world into the Kingdom is biblical, but it seems that too often Christians think that means calling people to come to church, which is not the same thing.

Thus both the enlargement and the narrowing of the sphere of freedom are strangely interdependent, because such things as technology, automation and the development of social relations which enlarge the sphere of freedom at the same time also furnish the means to restrict it.

• «Theologians... are invited to seek continually for more suitable ways of communicating doctrine to the men of their times; for the deposit of Faith or the truths are one thing and the manner in which they are enunciated, in the same meaning and understanding, is another» (62).

Matthew Warner's «Flocknote» project enables parishes to contact people from one source, sending the same material to a person's email inbox, Facebook or Twitter account, or to their mobile phone by text message; the important thing is that it is the end user that chooses which of these means is the one by which they prefer to receive information.

It is a moment of recognition which means that things will never look quite the same again.

Berkouwer rightly sees that the challenge of the nouvelle théologie was taken up by John XXIII in his opening address to the Second Vatican Council in a much - discussed statement: «The deposit or the truths of faith, contained in our sacred teaching, are one thing, while the mode in which they are enunciated, keeping the same meaning and the same judgment, is another.»

But if Jesus tells us to forgive those who sin against us 490 times (which means... don't even count, just always forgive), don't you think that God Himself does the same thing toward us?

To make this point, Pope Francis appeals here in this address and elsewhere to John XXIII's words at Vatican II, Gaudet Mater Ecclesia: «For the deposit of faith, the truths contained in our sacred teaching, are one thing; the mode in which they are expressed, but with the same meaning and the same judgment [eodem sensu eademque sententia], is another thing.»

But I am beginning to gather from statements in Muray's paper — such as that Hauerwas thinks «there is an unchanging core to the tradition» (86), which he means as a criticism — that Muray's anti-essentialism affirms that in fact there is nothing very definite to Christianity at all, meaning, I should think, that it is either everything or nothing — which in the end comes to the same thing.

I do make nutmilks which means they don't have to be chewed, and creamy nutbutters (same thing, no chewing).

One of the things I love most about these crumbles is they are essentially the same as a healthy granola on top of fruit, which means you can legitimately eat dessert for breakfast!!

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Which basically means the same thing!?

RUTH: Well I... I think I was the same thing as you Jenna because I didn't actually have larger breasts before pregnancy which is until, I mean pregnancy and then when I had the baby they just got even bigger but engorgement was really the biggest problem that I had too.

Feminism does not mean one thing to all people, unless you just simply want to say it means women should have the same rights as men (which is what it means to me).

«Babies naturally wake up two to six times a night, which means that whatever you're doing to get them to sleep at bedtime, you'll need to do that same thing whenever he stirs,» says Parents advisor Jodi Mindell, Ph.D., author of Sleeping Through the Night.

It doesn't get updated as much as I'd like but my experience with sleep training is one of the nice things about being in the NICU is they put this all in the same room but that put this on a different half hour schedules, so when we came home, there was a baby waking up every 30 minutes which if they you know, every two hours, that means you feed someone, feed someone, feed someone and then you get 20 minutes until the next kid wakes up, so yeah.

of children, which means there are plenty of families going through the same thing.

Once again you can change the toppings often which means your family won't get bored with the same old thing.

Now the dynamics identified in your post (together with the simple fact of Tory numerical supremacy within the coalition) mean that those issues not decisively closed off in the agreement will tend to be decided by the Tories in their own favour, and even those items that are dealt with in an apparently decisive way in the agreement will be pulled in a more «Tory» direction in their implementation, especially where being implemented by a Tory cabinet minister (or by David Laws, which amounts to the same thing...).

Two words which, in this context, mean the same thing.

If it's a matter of me learning a particular rhythm, I know that that's going to be a basal ganglia / cerebellum activity, which means what's important is to tap into this unconscious, habit - learning system, so I can't just do the same thing over and over again if I'm making mistakes.

These same studies have also begun to explain how and why the brain allocates each memory to a particular group of cells and how it links them together and organizes them — the physical means by which the scent of a madeleine, the legendary confection that sparked Marcel Proust's memory stream, leads to remembrance of things past.

«I would have to say the same thing about Professor Yin,» says Chang, who always uses Yin's title with his name or addresses him as Lao Tzu, which means «venerable master.»

That's a lot of genes, which means there are a lot of opportunities to see the same thing crop up repeatedly — like mistakes.

This means that a product may have sugar, evaporated cane juice and high - fructose corn syrup, which are all just different names for the same thing, and that's sugar.

«It does the same thing as a foam roller but the material is even harder, which means you get a deeper massage,» she says.

I mean if your eating a healthy diet anyways, you might not need super amounts of carotene for added protection and there's other things in veggies that are good for you besides carotene which is why I'm still eating them, but at the same time hoping not eating any added fat will help with high carotene / yellow tone factor.

What this means is that eating 50 grams of wheat protein isn't the same as eating 50 grams of pea or rice protein, which in turn isn't the same thing as eating 50 grams of egg or milk protein.

My friend Tanvii told me that her hubby does the same thing and that when they don't like it or when the men say «it doesn't go» that actually means we nailed it which is a great piece of advice.

Dating sites are also not very good at having policies which address this meaning that the same bloke can stick around on a long term dating site, showing all the right things and convincing women in succession that he's definitely interested in a relationship and then jumping right back on the site when he gets bored.