Sentences with phrase «which means the score»

For Arsenal, I hope one of the strikers will be influential which means we score lots of goals and we're going to have a good chance to go very far in the competition.

Almost half of the fourth quarter was gone and Taylor hadn't really gotten anything going through the air, which meant scoring fast was probably out.

I saved $ 15 off retail price (I checked the Gorjana website to be sure) plus my $ 10 monthly discount, which means I scored these $ 75 earrings for only $ 50!

Surround usage tended to favor music as well, which meant the score and songs spread to the back speakers in a positive way.

The 2018 Easter Jeep Safari is happening as we speak, which means scores of Jeepers from across the country have descended on the natural wonderland (and natural off - road playground) that is Moab,...

Different factors affect them, which means the score is never going to stay the same.

Mistakes are often made on the credit reports of many consumers, which means your score could be suffering from an event that isn't even related to your credit.

Also, not all creditors and lenders will report information to all 3 of the major credit bureaus, which means your score can change from one credit bureau to another.

When you fill out the form, LendingTree will do a soft credit pull — which means your score will not be negatively impacted.

The typical applicant approved for the Shell Drive for Five card will have at least fair credit, which means a score of 620 or higher.

To be approved for the Scotiabank American Express card, you need a good credit score or higher — which means a score of 650 and up.

Not exact matches

And as part of this change, some civil debts and tax liens will be excluded, which means some credit scores will edge higher.

That means Metacritic scores — which can determine financial bonuses for executives at studios and publishers — are compiled by trade and industry press, all of whom often depend on those same companies for their very livelihood.

When we talk about a «credit score,» we mean your FICO score, which was developed by the Fair Isaac Corporation.

Coming up with a number sounds clean and scientific but relying entirely on such a score and disregarding words entirely, means you lose the human voices behind the statistics, which have huge value, Marke insists.

Having a poor credit score will either keep you from obtaining credit altogether or place you in a high - risk category, which means that if you're approved for credit or loans, the interest rates you'll be offered will be significantly higher than someone with excellent credit.

Equifax creates several different business credit scores that are designed to predict how likely a business is to experience a severe delinquency, which means falling 91 days or more past due on an account, having an account charged off or filing for bankruptcy.

If your score is between 580 and 669, you have fair credit, which means you could have a tougher time getting approved for home loans with lower interest rates.

Your credit utilization makes up another 30 percent of your FICO score, which means how much you owe in relation to your credit limits plays a huge role in your credit health.

Having an excellent credit score has meant getting low rates on a mortgage and car loan, which is obviously also a huge savings.

China's Communist Party is a merciless meritocracy... if you're in Chinese leadership, you made it there by scoring high on a long series of exams, starting at age twelve — which means you haven't met a stupid person since you were in junior high school.

Private student loan lenders make refinancing available to well - qualified borrowers, which means there is a review of income, credit history and score, and other factors that show the borrower is a low risk to the lender.

Borrowers with fair to average credit — which means they have credit scores between 630 and 680 — will face more difficulty in getting personal loans than borrowers with good credit.

Your credit score is the chief means by which a company evaluates you.

This means that applying for multiple loans at once can lower your credit score by a few points, which could impact the interest rate you're quoted on later loan applications.

The bank looks for borrowers with strong credit history, which means a few or more years of credit history and a credit score of at least 680.

Higher scores mean higher reliability, which means less risk for the lender.

Conventional loans have risk - based pricing, which means if your credit score is lower than 740, you'll pay a higher interest rate on your loan.

However, certain banks or lenders often try to weed out potential borrowers that could be a credit risk, which means they'll have a much higher minimum credit score guideline.

To secure a release, the borrower will likely need to prove they can continue making on - time payments by themselves, which means having a steady income and a good credit score.

The study found America's average score was a 44, which means «most Americans are considered lonely,» the study said.

Which means that somehow director Matt Reeves (Cloverfield, 10 Cloverfield Lane) keeps the audience gripped in suspense for nearly two and a half hours largely with facial expressions, minimal dialogue, a sparse but hard - hitting score, and stunningly beautiful cinematography.

Each had a range of scale scores from one to seven, which means the composite index used here ranges from four to twenty - eight.

The primary outcome was the mean healthiness of all packaged food purchases over the 4 - wk intervention period, which was measured by using the Food Standards Australia New Zealand Nutrient Profiling Scoring Criterion (NPSC).

This means we scored three goals less than the champions, four less than the team from which the golden boot winner came from.

ProbLems with WILSHERE (1) HoLds onto the ball for too Long and is dispossessed of it... (2) Runs into tight pockets of spaces (spaces meant for 3 yr old kids and below)... (3) The boy just Loves to assist / score nice once - in - a-lifetime kinda goals (which rare ever happens)...

It was 3rd down which means they'd have 2 shots to score..

What I saw before the match — We can not afford to drop points any more — We suffer big injuries at the back, and we really need a clean sheet to boost our confidence — We have scored in every single match except at Dortmund and Chelsea, which mean if we keep a clean sheet we are most likely win, ugly or not

Indiana doesn't allow telecasts of courtroom proceedings, which means home viewers won't be able to score this bout round by round, as they did during the Smith case.

This is where I usually tell you that Arsenal are going to win, and that my gut is telling me it will be comfortable, but I'm afraid I'm not quite in the same optimistic position this weekend... Our defensive problems are keeping me up at night, and I can't see how we could possibly stop Chelsea from scoring at least two, which means we need to grab three!

His offense is imperfect, which means that Charlotte will likely struggle to score points (again), which means the Bobcats could be right back in this position next season.

In the five games we have played at Reading's ground we have won all of them with a total of 22 goals scored, that means an average of 4.4 per game, which is no mean figure!

I for one would go and get him straight away as Ben Yedder is an all round striker a bag of tricks he plays in a lower team and scored a bag full of goals which means he fought hard against better defenders to get his goals Ben Yedder can come at you from any direction with either foot and score and he is good at set pieces two I would be ecstatically delighted if we sign him up as we would have our own Mahrez

Im liking Wenger's «Project Sanchez», initially he looked lost and alone on his own upfront but seem to be growing into it quite nicely, far from the finished article though but at 27, this is the perfect time to switch his game from one based on a high work rate to one based on movement and intelligence, in the last two games, he has scored off rebounds which means he is really working on being at the right place at the right time rather than running endlessly in the hope pf getting lucky.

This does nt mean a thing its a case of somneone told me that someone else said...... fill in the blanks, Iwobi is a great player BUT he's not a proven front man and if put in a position of extreme pressure could fold like a paper bag, its unfair on the kid to place him this role so early on in his career Also much like Welbecks promising end to the season which was cut short again he just is» nt the goal scoring monster that we really really need.

The manner with which Terry celebrated the draw, speaks for itself on the Chelsea intent to make sure we don't score even if it means they don't either.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Which means there were 30 chances for various teammates to settle the score.

The students would chant it each time Klass scored, which for this match meant five times — including the game - winner with 29 seconds left.

We expected a difficult game, which it was, but I thought the second half performance meant we deserved a little bit, even though we had to wait until the last minute to score the winning goal.