Sentences with phrase «which point the attacked»

You need to connect to the internal electronics to accomplish anything anyway, at which point the attack can happen.»

Not exact matches

A source familiar with the White House emails on the Benghazi talking point revisions say that State Department spokesman Victoria Nuland was raising two concerns about the CIA's first version of talking points, which were going to be sent to Congress: 1) The talking points went further than what she was allowed to say about the attack during her state department briefings; and, 2) she believed the CIA was attempting to exonerate itself at the State Department's expense by suggesting CIA warnings about the security situation were ignored.

To see how this works, all you have to do is take a look at any Trump interaction with his supporters, whether through Twitter or Facebook (including his «Trump TV» broadcasts, which critics have attacked as low quality, thereby missing the point).

The White House has insisted that it made only a «stylistic» change to the intelligence agency talking points from which Rice suggested on five Sunday talk shows that demonstrations over an anti-Islamic video devolved into the Benghazi attack.

The video is an example of an «Attack Hook», which is designed to bluntly present a point, with the hope of drawing traffic and conversation.

The Dow dropped 777 points which was actually a larger point drop than the day the market reopened after the 9/11 attacks.

While the president attacks 99 percent of his opponents by mercilessly strafing them in speeches, sound bites and tweets (and has a one - size - fits - all approach to firebombing Democrats, disobedient Republicans, Gold Star families, war heroes, etc.), Daniels fends off her online critics with self - deprecating humor, and has made a point of refraining from saying anything bad about the president himself — which has probably kept him from retaliating and going after her personally.

I'm only pointing out personal attacks are all you seem to have, which is indicative of a very weak position.

This can be done from many points of view, but I have suggested above that the crucial attack is that which accepts the same data and then shows that the argument does not exclude the presence of contingent elements in God's total nature.

My point was that you were making logical fallacy by attacking your opponent instead of attacking their argument, which is called an Ad Hominem fallacy.

So while yes, the meme DOES attack religion for demeaning and victimizing women (which was the original point of the original cartoon), it ALSO attacks (or at least shifts blame to) the victim herself.

I find it odd that aetheists feel so directly personally offended by Christian symbols... they are not offered as an «attack», unless you see the sharing of beliefs as an attack upon your own beliefs, in which case I think there is a deeper problem... This billboard IS a direct attack, and as many others have pointed out there is a better way to share your belief as an aetheist.

The sharp point of his attack is to be found in a parable which reads almost like a declaration of war.

A major turning point was Iraq war, during which the group al Qaeda in Iraq staged attacks that killed huge numbers of civilians, tarnishing the al Qaeda brand in eyes of Muslims who had expressed at least tacit support for the organization.

Humility does not prevent us pointing out that Faith has published numerous articles over recent years which have addressed in detail many of the attacks levelled against the Church in the debate.

An essential element in this attack was the critique of «the myth of objective consciousness,» which pointed out the links among the establishment's claims to legitimacy, its tendency to submit to depersonalizing technological forces, and its Enlightenment heritage of scientific authority.

The non-Fascist, the anti-Fascist, was approaching a point at which he would have to ask himself whether the parish church was still his church; he was now having to go to mass early in the morning if he wished to avoid the sermon, which too often comprised a full - scale attack on all the democratic, masonic Governments which were opposing the providential plans of the Duce.

Instead they knew that their biggest strength was tactical discipline and counter attacking play would help them gain points from real / barca which is where the title is essentially lost or won.

Everyone time I defend this club (and having to do so against OUR OWN FANS is a completely different issue), one of the main points people always use to criticise Arsenal with, is the utterly embarrassing manner in which our own «fans» constantly attack the players, manager and the board.

Add David Luis for 30 and drag his Brazil boy Lucas for 20 and Sanchez seing this will extend, just pay him 25 in combine bonus and salary... It's not about winter or summer window but who we need and smart moves when we best timing which we fail to in everyway for years... I'm keep pointing since summer window a such obvious stunner potential star for arsenal attack named Dembele at Celtic, as Lukaku, Everton after him... He'll be like Cantona or Ibra for Arsenal, not Henry but as shinning.

You get a point for every goal scored in your matches, as well as three points for a win, which encourages attacking play.

With the bulk of the game now being played out in their own half Hertha's only real hope of stealing the three points lay on exposing their opponents faults on the counter attack and ten minutes remaining they very almost did only for Nico Schulz to spurn a glorious chance which was created by veteran Ivory Coast front man Salomon Kalou.

He is kinda tall, but he consistently comes off with great leverage, which helps him dominate at the point of attack against the run.

On the high pick - and - roll, they moved the point of attack away from the imaginary line running down the middle of the floor to a few feet into the slot, which is the 8 - foot section of the floor between the wing and the middle of the floor.

Hoping fan man united win or a draw because if liverpool lose and we win thats six points off clear we will be then they hace to come to emirates and attack us which will play into our hands.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Despite conceding a goal, Birley FC looked determined to carry on and push for three points, which they proved attack after attack.

It might be down to a more attacking style which has seen us score 8 more goals than at this stage last season, (although for only a point better off and one less defeat but still 2nd in the table) conceding 4 more in the process.

Why do our midfielders and wing backs consistently attack to the point of suicide leaving us completely vulnerable to counterattacks which predictably succeed?

No point of overthinking this CSKA have to try and score 4 goals to beat us they will be trying to pile on the attack from the first mnt which means they will be wide open at the back which we can take advantage with our fire power and creative midfield,

At some - point giroud will start scoring and teams will want to be desperate and will attack rather than defend which surely has to play into the hands of club but Sanchez is still in the tired moment and will want his teammates to motivate him further to start scoring just Diego Costa.

Bruschi said during 1 episode that our defense looked way too slow on tape and needs to be faster at the point of attack, which I agree with.

The Kent State Golden Flashes used a potent rushing attack which notched 283 yards to top the Army Black Knights, 31 - 17 at West Point on Saturday afternoon.

His strengths will be maximized and his weaknesses can be minimized RG — TBD, but whoever it is will be a stronger at the point of attack than Harris was and can't possibly be worse against bull rush, which was the root of all Harris» problems in pass pro RT — McGary is already playing in position.

The major comparison is ticket prices, which are generally and sometimes comically lower in Germany than the Premier League, but advocates also point to the generally attacking football, frequently lively atmosphere and the fact that the money saved can be spent on beer which can then be drunk in sight of the pitch.

Santi, Santiago, little magician, call the man whatever you want, but the point is that he is the most important piece in our formation, take him out and the team lacks that link which connects defense - midfield - attack.

There are already echoes of that season in which Liverpool emerged as if from nowhere to play thrilling, attacking football and challenge for a title that ultimately went to City by just two points.

But prior evidence, particularly games against the fellow top six sides under Jose Mourinho, quite clearly points to systemic issues across United's attacking setup which undercuts the blame that is willingly shoved on the Armenian.

Liverpool's impressive early season form, which sees them just two points off the top after 8 Premier League matches, has been largely down to just how rampant their attack has been.

Liverpool didn't struggle to score goals last season and with the majority of the same attacking threat still at the club (Suarez, Sturridge and Coutinho) Rodgers» focus was on the defence and he has done a fine job in strengthening an area which cost Liverpool a lot of points last season.

Anyway, Liverpool were wasteful and spatially poor in a frustrating game, which can only really be considered as two points dropped, but perhaps this goalscoring blank is just a blip after a few barnstorming attacking displays.

Enrique has 2 direct assists this season, which isn't a lot, but I bet he is involved in a lot of attacking moves (at some point) that would lead to goals.

Unfortunately, despite their attacking prowess they often have low hit points, which translates into lots of injuries in the real world, but what even is the real world anymore after the launch of Pokémon Go?

Certainly he has the skills to serve as the reference point in attack, and he has the confidence to bring the ball from deep positions into the offensive third; the crucial detail is in whether Neymar can learn from and adapt to the different scenarios in which he will have to play this role.

Ghana Premier League side Medeama have filed an official protest against Elmina Sharks demanding maximum points and three goals after irate home fans physically attacked referee Nuhu Liman Yakubu during a Premier League game on Wednesday, in a shocking episode which has shocked the nation, GHANAsoccernet.com can confirm.

That was the point last season at which Mourinho switched from an attacking style to a more defensive one, as it became apparent the Blues» strikers just couldn't finish.

The point is that there was a clearly correctable problem in our attack that Wenger didn't really attempt to address until 15 minutes before the end, which is often too little time to make an impact.

Their faulty offensive attack leads to draws and defeats at the hands of opponents that they should take of which results in loss points.

Some are seeing the game as one we should attack as it's something of a free hit with little expected but the same attitude prevailed over the Chelsea game when we came away with a point which felt like three.

Attacking wise, which is one of his strong points, he just did not do enough to threaten.