The ruling in Pino is an important component of the court's recent trilogy of cases in
which real evidence was excluded.
Not exact matches
These risks and uncertainties include, among others: the unfavorable outcome of litigation, including so - called «Paragraph IV» litigation and other patent litigation, related to any of our products or products using our proprietary technologies,
which may lead to competition from generic drug manufacturers; data from clinical trials may be interpreted by the FDA in different ways than we interpret it; the FDA may not agree with our regulatory approval strategies or components of our filings for our products, including our clinical trial designs, conduct and methodologies and, for ALKS 5461,
evidence of efficacy and adequacy of bridging to buprenorphine; clinical development activities may not be completed on time or at all; the results of our clinical development activities may not be positive, or predictive of
real - world results or of results in subsequent clinical trials; regulatory submissions may not occur or be submitted in a timely manner; the company and its licensees may not be able to continue to successfully commercialize their products; there may be a reduction in payment rate or reimbursement for the company's products or an increase in the company's financial obligations to governmental payers; the FDA or regulatory authorities outside the U.S. may make adverse decisions regarding the company's products; the company's products may prove difficult to manufacture, be precluded from commercialization by the proprietary rights of third parties, or have unintended side effects, adverse reactions or incidents of misuse; and those risks and uncertainties described under the heading «Risk Factors» in the company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10 - K and in subsequent filings made by the company with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission («SEC»),
which are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.
Second, while it makes sense that an environment in
which investments, like government debt, are yielding a smaller return might cause people to spend less today in order to make their retirement goals, there just isn't a lot of
evidence that this happens in the
real world.
«Papadopoulos» interaction with Russian agents, coupled with
real - time
evidence of Russian election interference, provided the Court with a broader context in
which to evaluate Russia's clandestine activities and Page's history and alleged contact with Russian officials,» the document said.
There is no
evidence that the policy,
which encourages borrowing by keeping long - term interest rates low, has inflated dangerous bubbles in the stock market and residential
real estate, she said.
The
evidence for this demand also lies in
real estate transactional volume in Dubai,
which increased by 53 per cent in 2013 for an aggregate amount of Dh236 billion per Dubai Land Department's statistics.
evidencing a roughly eight percent ownership position in the
real estate investment trust, Seritage Growth Properties
which to my knowledge is not parallel as a Berkshire investment.
Accordingly, a year - over-year increase in new claims of about 20 % (
which would currently equate to a level of about 340,000 weekly new claims) would create a significant concern of a new recession in progress, particularly if coupled with other
evidence such as equity market weakness and slowing growth in
real personal income.
Considering
evidence and observation are the ways in
which we learn things to be true in the
real world, I find it ironical that for the ultimate truth we are to ask no questions, observe no
evidence and make only an emotional connection.
In fact, there is nothing special about christianity — it is just one of many cults that claim to have all the answers, none of
which provide any
real evidence for any of their supernatural claims.
No intelligent person would think that the only
real things are those
which are proven with
evidence.
Religion has nothing to support it but heresay and popularity - neither of
which can be counted as
real evidence.
@one one it is explainable, only that the
REAL problem comes when you demand physical
evidence which is practically impossible, like i said, God is not going to come and take us by the hand so we make our choice, we have to make our choice on our own without being able to physically watch Him
But the claims of religion
which touch upon things
which can be observed and tested in the
real world can be proven true or untrue as the
evidence for or against those things is discovered.
Something for
which there is no
evidence that it is
real, or that it interacts with our world at all if it is
real.
But we still don't have enough
evidence to know
which of those is the
real answer.
To say there is no
evidence for the
real existence of the most discussed figure in history denies the unique manner in
which Christianity came about (a claim that God came in the flesh conveyed with
real life details, etc).
Many atheists I would say wouldn't mind the concept of a god being
real and heaven etc... But we aren't willing to ignore reality to stroke a belief
which is not plausible in light of
evidence and what we understand already about reality.
I am open minded when it comes to «
real truth» but
real truth requires
real evidence of
which there is none for a god.
Each one of us must eventually face the
real issue,
which is quite simply: do I believe after adult examination of the
evidence that Jesus Christ was what he claimed to be, or am I prepared to assert quite definitely that he was wrong in his major claims and that, though much of his teaching is beautiful, he himself was a self - deceived fanatic?
There is little
evidence that the claims have been thoroughly investigated, and signs that the Church (
which has been feeble over several cases of
real and proven abuse) wishes to appear decisive and effective to save itself from the fate that has overtaken the Roman Catholics.
In
real life, a lot of convictions are still obtained through coerced confessions and uncertain witness testimony,
which is just about the worst
evidence there is.
Once we believe in the Holy Spirit (assuming they are
real, we could only have had such experience of this Jesus by means of such a Spirit), this allows for faith that God works in humanity and can preserve messages to us,
which could include the Bible as an infallible Word from God, thus admitting the Bible as «
evidence».
It is common for people to say that there is much about the resurrection of Jesus that they do not profess to understand, but that the
evidence makes it clear that something of a unique and miraculous order occurred,
which had the effect of leaving the tomb of Jesus empty, and of convincing the disciples that Jesus was alive in some
real sense.
there's been a lot of faked
evidence — like the shroud of turin (
which people still insist on believing is
real — even after it's been shown ~ scientifically ~ to be a fake)-- and bits of toast with the image of jebus on them — but nothing credible at all in the way of substantiated
real evidence.
It's better to live with reality than to pretend the religious bullsh!it you believe is
real, unless of course you have actual
evidence to support your beliefs
which otherwise should only be called delusions of the mentally ill.
but i didn't state anything example — i stated that the theory of evolution is yet to be proved and so with that i agree that due to that lacking it is equal to the theory of god... the only thing i said
which is cemented truth for anything is that we don't know what the
real answer is... and by stating ideas as facts serves no
real purpose but a selfish one... lets call it an ease - ment on the inner self, the mind can now be at peace with the hope that when i die i get to live yet again... full belief in this is insane without
evidence.
Little argument is offered, alternative positions are rarely mentioned and never analyzed nor refuted, no
real evidence for his positive proposals is provided, there is page after page of blunt assertion, and after the first chapter I simply lost count of the leaps of logic
which larded every section.
Actually there's absolutely no «historical
evidence» for the
real existence of «Jesus»...
which is (according to the Christian scriptures) a good thing... since it's «by faith ye are saved», and proof negates faith along with any need for it...
Thus, when we use Genesis as a basis for understanding history, we can make sense of
evidence which would otherwise be a
real mystery.
I believe that each one of us must eventually face the
real issue,
which is quite simply: do I believe after adult examination of the
evidence that Jesus Christ was what he claimed to be, or am I prepared to assert quite definitely that he was wrong in his major claims and that, though much of his teaching is beautiful, he himself was a self - deceived fanatic?
The God of Abraham
which the the major religeons of the world are based on, is just as
real as Zeus, Santa Claus, or bigfoot (the is more
evidence for bigfoot...).
In the case of Harpur's theory (that Jesus didn't exist, and that deliberate efforts have been made to choose to make the myths interpreted literally), his
evidence is not as convincing or as extensive as the
evidence for Jesus having been a
real person, on whom a certain religious and political systems have been formed and
which have embellished, perverted, and developed certain aspects, with intentions both deliberate and unintentional.
This is
evidenced on our sister website, Sweets & Savoury Snacks World, with recent gluten - free product launches including Too Good To Be Gluten Free's snack packs,
which include cocktail sausages and mini Scotch eggs, as well as Eat
Real's new Organic Hummus Chips, Organic Lentil Chips and Organic Veggie Straws.
Picking
which surprise contenders are
real reminds me of picking out
which hitters are legitimately better in clutch situations: They exist, but you can't tell with the naked eye and anecdotal
evidence.
Another thing I've noticed is that whenever Wenger actually comes under
real pressure from the fans, the players actually start performing,
which also can be seen as
evidence they don't feel the pressure to win most of the time.
All the talk about signing a striker in Jan seems to be only media gossip BUT i think based on some of what wenger has said
which is no surprise from past seasons as it appears we will not sign anyone, I hope that's not the case BUT if it is it will be more
evidence of
real misjudgment by wenger.
The second was a collective effort from the team
which had
evidence to suggest that the players feel there is something actually worth fighting for now, a committed performance with
real determination and endeavour from the players to do the club and it's loyal and passionate supporters well.
While there is
evidence that accidental suffocation can and does occur in bed - sharing situations, in the overwhelming number of cases (sometimes in 100 % of them) in
which a
real overlay by an adult occurs, extremely unsafe sleeping condition or conditions can be identified including situations where adults are not aware that the infant was in the bed, or an adult sleeping partners who are drunk or desensitized by drugs, or indifferent to the presence of the baby.
There is
real evidence that extended breastfeeding benefits children in the developing world, where young children are challenged by malnutrition and greater exposure to infectious diseases,
which is why the World Health Organization recommends breastfeeding for two years.
The
evidence suggests that most
real people are shocked by the growth of inequality and the rise of the super-rich (or top 1.0 cent)
which have been among the central themes of the last thirty years of British history.
The conviction was later overturned by the High Court,
which found «there was no
evidence to suggest that any of the followers of the appellant's «tweet» found it to be of a menacing character or, at a time when the threat of terrorism is
real, even minimally alarming.»
«These two attack dogs [Koku Anyidoho and Kofi Adams] engaging in the monotonous acts of character assassination to avoid the
real issue, deliberately repeated similar unfounded accusations against me that I had creditably refuted with supporting facts and
evidence,
which the very media carrying the recycled accusations had published in previous years.
At Mr. Silver's trial, the government presented
evidence that prosecutors said showed he had orchestrated two schemes through
which he obtained nearly $ 4 million in illegal payments for taking official actions that benefited a prominent cancer researcher, Dr. Robert N. Taub, at Columbia University, and two New York
real estate development firms.
When I found they tried to hide from me for ever, I have the braveness and candidness to post my testimony and
evidence on the web, into the light for public scrutiny; By contrast, ZZZ / YYY / VVV continue to hide their
real identities and materials they made up (e.g. Gabriele Scheler's recanted testimony) to mess up this case in the darkness,
which leaves room for ZZZ / YYY / VVV to crook justice on their hands; I believe ZZZ / YYY / VVV had colluded with Scheler and Thrun to terrorize / extort authorities, as well,
which should be another set of crimes from them against human society;
Silver's lawyers also claimed there wasn't enough
evidence to even consider charges related to a second alleged scheme, in
which Silver steered a
real estate company to a friend's law firm, also in exchange for fees, Defense attorneys say the parties involved had no idea Silver was even collecting the money.
And then the other prong is the investigative stage, where we will turn over
evidence of criminality that we've uncovered to the appropriate authorities
which, without hyperbole, will be a
real eye - opener for a lot of people.»
It was not until the detection of quasars,
which allow astronomers to see the light emitted by matter falling into black holes, that we had
evidence that they were
real objects and not just mathematical curiosities predicted by Einstein's general theory of relativity.
«More research is needed to determine
which kinds of relationships are more likely to produce the unwanted consequence of physician bias to create rational,
evidence - based policies that allow for the participation of key clinical experts while managing
real or perceived conflicts.
This is one of those interesting cases in
which both experiments and
real life have now provided
evidence to resolve this debate convincingly: the case for mass free distribution of bed nets has proved to be stunningly powerful.