Not exact matches
Our general circulation model simulations,
which take into account the recently observed widespread occurrence of vertically extended atmospheric brown clouds over the Indian Ocean and Asia3, suggest that atmospheric brown clouds contribute as much as the
recent increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gases to regional lower atmospheric
warming trends.
Here we show that the
recent warming in this region is strongly associated with a negative
trend in the North Atlantic Oscillation,
which is a response to anomalous [natural] Rossby wave - train activity [planetary waves related to the Earth's rotation] originating in the tropical Pacific.
From his own research in chemical oceanography, along with data from a number of
recent studies, Weber points out that some negative consequences of greenhouse gas emissions and
warming «are manifesting faster than previously predicted,» including ocean acidification and oxygen loss,
which are expected to affect «a large fraction of marine species if current
trends continue unchecked.»
Finally, to show that cosmic rays were actually responsible for some part of the
recent warming you would need to show that there was actually a decreasing
trend in cosmic rays over
recent decades —
which is tricky, because there hasn't been (see the figure)(Missing step # 5).
«Using the [cherry flavored &; >) RSS data,
which Santer used in determining his 17 - yr minimum time needed for a human global
warming signal, the most
recent 17 - yr
trend is the lowest in the entire data series.»
And efforts to establish some sort of long term
warming trend hidden away due to other factors have required a great many very complex and convoluted statistical calesthenics — all of
which have been rendered irrelevant thanks to the
recent data «corrections» by Karl et al..
4:38 p.m. Updated I read Mark Fischetti's piece on global
warming and hurricanes in Scientific American just now,
which points to a
recent PNAS study finding «a statistically significant
trend in the frequency of large surge events» from tropical cyclones in the Atlantic.
And note in addition that in addition to the
warming, there are strong
trends toward decreasing rainfall across the Antipodean continent,
which are backed up by tragically decreased river and stream flows, severe water restrictions in most states (starting to ease in some places due to
recent floods), and a significantly increased farmer suicide rate.
It's been nice in
recent days to see some strong advocates for curbs in emissions of greenhouse gases shift from the more overheated, and unsupported, rhetoric they used earlier this year in attempting a kind of «kitchen sink» argument aiming to tie virtually every
recent harmful weather event to
warming, even those — like powerful tornadoes — for
which there is no link and certainly no
trend.
These earlier years, mainly El Nino years, average 11.5 years earlier than the projected
recent hottest four, perhaps suggesting a rough calculation of the
recent rate of AGW of at +0.16 ºC / decade, this of course the
warming trend of peak years through the so - called «hiatus» years and being «peak years», it is a rate
which assumes cooler years will be coming along soon.
No doubt the southern ocean, featured strongly by Hansen et al, plays an important role, but data there are poor, and change is not well known; in particular the
recent hiatus in global
warming greatly influences any observations,
which can therefore be quite misleading wrt
trends.
The Idsos would ignore both old and
recent data, corrections, and the overwhelming majority of USHCN stations
which showed
warming trends.
Basically, there is no systematic
trend in the modern GCR (presumably the data
which is most reliable) that can explain the
recent warming.
[Response: There is evidence that the enhanced continental winter
warming in the Northern Hemisphere,
which has resulted at least in part from a
recent trend towards the positive phase of the Arctic Oscillation (AO), may in fact also represent a response to anthropogenic impacts on climate.
Our general circulation model simulations,
which take into account the recently observed widespread occurrence of vertically extended atmospheric brown clouds over the Indian Ocean and Asia, suggest that atmospheric brown clouds contribute as much as the
recent increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gases to regional lower atmospheric
warming trends.
The most
recent 13 complete calendar years, from 2002 through 2014, have averaged 0.18 °C (about 0.33 °F)
warmer than the 30 - year baseline average, while the global temperature
trend during that span was a
warming trend at the rate of +0.05 °C per decade —
which is also statistically insignificant.
And they analyse the double standards used when discussing the so - called «pause» as compared to an equally long period of rapid
warming,
which in fact deviated more from the long - term
trend than the
recent phase of slower
warming.
Also, using the same cherry picking approach as used by «skeptics» for the
recent time period, based on
which they claim a «global
warming stop» or «pause» because of lacking statistical significance of a
warming trend, I even could claim a «pause» in global
warming from 1979 to at least the end of 1997.
It is not sufficient, because you also would have to show that the statistical
trend estimate,
which gives you Zero - or negative
warming over the
recent time period is not just something spurious due to the very noisy character of the limited data, masking a signal that you may see when your data sample is larger.
For more information on this topic a good link is: http://www.climateaudit.org/ As these records may not be as reliable as we would want them to be in consideration of the small degree of
warming we are trying to measure, it is perhaps better to rely on other measures,
which are more accurate, and do show a
recent warming trend.
Ding et al., 2014 http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v509/n7499/full/nature13260.html «Here we show that the
recent warming in this region [northeastern Canada and Greenland] is strongly associated with a negative
trend in the North Atlantic Oscillation,
which is a response to anomalous Rossby wave - train activity [planetary waves related to the Earth's rotation] originating in the tropical Pacific.
However, despite this, the team reckon to have perhaps isolated a «global
warming» signal in the accelerated run off of the Greenland Ice Mass — but only just, because the runoff at the edges is balanced by increasing central mass — again, they focus upon
recent trends — a net loss of about 22 cubic kilometres in total ice mass per year
which they regard as statistically not significant — to find the «signal», and a contradiction to their ealier context of air temperature cycles.
Early on in my following of the global
warming issue I became aware of the Surface Stations Survey,
which led me to be very skeptical of the validity of the most
recent temperature data
trends, as I have never seen any convincing explanation as to how data from the many urban heat island and «corrupted» temperature monitoring sites are properly corrected.
You can not justify cherry - picking 1998 as the «start date of a 15 - year
trend showing imperceptible
warming» (as Met Office did) versus cherry - picking the most
recent 10 - year period starting in 2002,
which shows a statistically significant (if shorter) cooling
trend.
Second, there are presently only very few millennial length records available for direct comparison between the
recent period and the MWP, and these records show
trends which are not necessarily coherent over the latter interval, resulting in a «'' flattening» of MWP conditions compared to
recent warming in our reconstruction.
For those wanting a closer look at the more
recent wiggles and
trends, the second graph starts in 1998,
which was the start year used by von Storch et al (2013) Can climate models explain the
recent stagnation in global
warming?
This surface
warming would suggest a temperature
trend of about 1º C per century,
which is less than that predicted by the computer simulations, but it is unlikely that even this
recent trend in surface
warming is primarily attributable to human - made greenhouse gases....
However, if this was correct reasoning one could claim with equal validity, using the same data set and time period, that there has been global
warming over the
recent 20 - year period, since the
trend is also not statistically significantly distinguishable from the
trend estimate over the time period since 1979 («global
warming» is the Null - hypothesis in this case),
which itself is highly statistically significantly different from a Zero -
trend (RSS: 0.124 + / -0.067 deg.
Spring and Autumn exhibit much more significant
recent warming trends,
which might lead us to imagine that they could represent «extremes».
SteveF has a post Estimating the underlying
trend in
recent warming,
which is essentially a redo of the Foster and Rahstorf analysis.
Regarding clouds,
recent trends suggest a slight decline in total cloud cover over several decades, due to a reduction in low clouds,
which exert a net cooling influence, while high cirrus clouds,
which are net
warmers, have remained relatively constant.
Instead of the proposed positive feedback producing ever faster atmospheric temperature increases, the plot reveals a very strong
warming trend that accelerated during the 2015/16 El Nino phenomenon,
which then quickly decelerated to a per century
trend of 4.3 degrees Celsius - and, in the
recent past, similar deceleration patterns have lead to outright negative per century cooling
trends.
Let me put it another way: If the
recent statistical
trend combines both AMO and global
warming, then the correct heuristic interpretation of the result is an 80 % increase in likelihood, relative to a world in
which both global
warming and AMO had ceased.
As to» the truth», researchers have not expressed any evidence based on empiric observations according to
which the
trend of
recent multidecadal global
warming could have been controlled by anthropogenic CO2 emissions to atmospere.
Recent high profile heat waves, such as the one in Texas and Oklahoma in the summer of 2011, raise the question of whether these extreme events are related to the on - going global
warming trend,
which has been attributed with a high degree of confidence to human - made greenhouse gases (4).
The historical
trend since 1979 is heavily influenced by the
recent slowdown in the rate of surface
warming which is likely to be the result of natural variability overprinting the forced
trend.
The «pause» discussion continues (see RC for a summary of
recent coverage),
which seems a bit silly to me, because it isn't really a «pause» at all, just a continued anthropogenically - forced
warming with some other (anthropogenic and natural) forcings and internal variability added on, such that the
trend is a little lower than most expected.
For one of many good demonstrations that the
recent slowdown (
which, importantly, is «slow» only relative to immediately preceding «fast»
warming — that's a hint for you) in no way is evidence against the continuing long term
trend, see climate statistician Tamino's
recent post «Slowdown Skeptic,» and «It's the
Trend, Stupid,» and «Is Earth's Temperature About to Soar?»
And, in the more bad news department, we have a
recent paper of regional
warming trend projections,
which indicates that all of the contiguous United States will experience 2 °C of
warming (above pre-industrial) within 20 - 30 years.
We note, however, that the polar regions, where
recent warming has been greatest, are overrepresented in the 9 % of the Earth's surface for
which observed temperature
trends are not available.
The
recent negative
trend in spring snow cover is underestimated by the CMIP5 (and CMIP3) models (Derksen and Brown, 2012),
which is associated with an underestimate of the boreal land surface
warming (Brutel - Vuilmet et al., 2013).
The adjustments and non-adjustments instead increased the warmth in the
recent warm cycle that ended in 2001 and / or inexplicably cooled many locations in the early record, both of
which augmented the apparent
trend.»