Because the being of woman has traditionally been so closely identified with her biological role in reproduction, many aspects of feminist protest are linked to sexuality and marriage and the limitations
which religious dogma and social custom have placed on women in these areas.
Not exact matches
The difference is that the supernatural claims of
religious dogma are things
which can not ever be proven true outside of the context
which I have already mentioned,
which is the context of belief.
The cult of relics is a tradition
which religious Christians prefer to knowing the
dogma and practising charitable love.
Even if we chose to interject
religious dogma into the classroom,
which religion is appropriate?
On that rainy morning in Cambridge, I inhabited a
religious world in
which dogma seemed secure; and a demonstrative faith, surely, is a good thing.
Most people lose or forget the subjectively
religious experience, and redefine Religion as a set of habits, behaviors,
dogmas, forms,
which at the extreme becomes entirely legalistic and bureaucratic, conventional, empty, and in the truest meaning of the word, antireligious.
Contrast this with
religious dogma,
which is the polar opposite of this method.
Although held in theory over a long period, the belief was accentuated during the latter part of the nineteenth century and since, and became finally a basic
dogma underlying the Japanese Imperial thrust,
which is often regarded as the beginning of World War II.9 The idea was taught in the schools, in the army, and resulted finally in a fanatical
religious, as well as patriotic, devotion to the emperor, without
which, it seems to the writer, it is impossible to explain the daring attack of the island empire of Japan upon the richest and most powerful nation in the world, the United States.
E.g., in regards to scientific support for evolution and rejection of creationism and the young earth
dogma, in 1986, 72 US Nobel Prize winners, 17 state academies of science and 7 other scientific societies, signed an amicus curiae brief asking the US Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard to reject a Louisiana state law requiring the teaching of creationism,
which the brief described as embodying
religious dogma.
I can asssure you, if you ever should find youself questioning Lutheran
dogma — some of
which Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, and Calvinists condemn as heresy, BTW — your experience of your
religious community would become quite different.
In 1986, an amicus curiae brief, signed by 72 US Nobel Prize winners, 17 state academies of science and 7 other scientific societies, asked the US Supreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard, to reject a Louisiana state law requiring the teaching of creationism (
which the brief described as embodying
religious dogma).
Religious dogma stems from a time in
which human rights and moral norms were far different from today.
I wonder if «spiritual but not
religious» is a bit of a cultural transitional stage in
which it is becoming clear that formal
religious dogma is at best intellectually unsatisfying, and at worst not only false but dangerous; and yet we don't really know what to do with that part of our brain that seeks magical explanations for what we can not easily understand.
Christianity was never our state religion, nor did we have in Rousseau's strict sense a civil religion, a simple set of
religious dogmas to
which every citizen must subscribe on pain of exile.
No
religious or ideological
dogma, he argues, can acquire relevance in this dialogue «unless it shows a capacity to redefine and integrate within its framework the deepest aspiration of liberation
which that culture has aroused in humankind... in order to do that religions including Christianity [also] need to be redefined» (p. 320).
«A
dogma,» writes Whitehead, «
which fails to evoke any response in immediate experience stifles the
religious life.»
The threat to this idea of secularism arises form
religious fundamentalism
which is afraid of insecurity through change in traditional
religious dogmas, ritual practices of purity and impurity in social laws; the threat also comes from communalism
which seeks political power for one's
religious community or in the case of Hindutva wants to establish a Hindu state.
I am not talking here about the limiting beliefs of
religious or political
dogma,
which for so long have shackled humanity into fear, guilt and disempowerment, and could have their own long discussion.
In describing the difference between «equilibrium sensitivity» and «transient response» you get into descriptions
which sound very much like
religious belief or
dogma.
Alternatively, the word connotes
religious belief for
which no proof can be given but only the authority of the
religious leaders can establish a
dogma.