In any case, I will do you the honor of assuming that you are interested in hearing what those who speak such a language have to say, and I will also suppose that a faith
which seeks understanding may sometimes find it.
Not exact matches
It also serves as a data - driven fashion laboratory in
which the designer and retailer can better
understand what petite women are
seeking in petite sizing in order to guide future offerings.
Understand your company, competitors, and the venture firm from
which you are
seeking investment.
Adwords Keyword Tool:
Understanding which keyword phrases are being searched most, while also having the least amount of competition, greatly enhances your ability to produce content that can satisfy those
seeking answers to their questions.
In order to
understand the context in
which the FBI
sought a FISA warrant for Carter Page, it is necessary to
understand how the investigation began, what other information the FBI had about Russia's efforts to interfere with our election, and what the FBI knew about Carter Page prior to making application to the court — including Carter Page's previous interactions with Russian intelligence operatives.
To do the research appropriately, marketers need to
understand the triggers for need for a specific category, their personas mindset (
which some of your questions get at), their priorities, values, how they
seek information and learn about products and services and more.
Founders should
understand the process by
which startups
seek global patent protection for new inventions.
Our goal is to highlight the experiences of those who invest in alternatives — including
which strategies they use to
seek specific outcomes — to build broader
understanding of this asset class.
In the book's final pages Martin delineates what he regards as the only three possible solutions: «Only Faith,» in
which the believer is dismissive of the expert opinions of the historians; «Only Reason,» in
which the believer is «totally submissive to the historians»; and «Faith
Seeking Understanding,» in
which some sort of compromise is worked out between the historian and faith.
Science
seeks to
understand how God has established the Created Order and this is something
which has always fascinated Christians and non-Christian's alike.
Martin delineates what he regards as the only three possible solutions: «Only Faith,» «Only Reason,» and «Faith
Seeking Understanding,» in
which some sort of compromise is worked out between the historian and faith.
Nevertheless, as we
seek to
understand the violence of God in the Old Testament in light of Jesus Christ, it is the tenth plague that is of primary importance for this study, for it this plague
which killed all the firstborn sons of Egypt.
It is not a retreat from social or political action to
seek to get to the bottom of things and to
understand the truth,
which is about all we have left anyway.
Equally inexhaustible and rich is the Gospel of Jesus Christ
which undergirds and enlightens all our efforts to
seek to
understand and discern God's Holistic Mission in our own context and our own generation.
His ontological
understanding of the priest as the one standing in for Christ who teaches, protects, leads and sanctifies led him to question many of the initiatives in the 1980s
which sought to extend to the laity tasks traditionally the function of the priest.
This model invites students to see the New Testament as the product of a profoundly human process of experience and interpretation, by
which people of another age and place, galvanized by a radical religious experience,
sought to
understand both that experience and themselves in the light of the symbols made available to them by their culture.
If a problem arises
which is not dealt with clearly in the Qur» an or in the Sunnah, the answer is
sought in the schools of thought, the theories worked out by «leaders of thought» who have been careful students of the Qur» an and the Sunnah, have thought profoundly about their inner meanings and
understand their general principles, and who have special knowledge of virtue and the general welfare.
This history of the proclamation is the object of historical research in the New Testament
which we
seek, and
which is the only legitimate object of such historical research according to the New Testament's
understanding of itself.»
When we see that there can be no self -
understanding apart from some grasp of Origin and Destiny, an
understanding which certainly includes an acknowledgment of what is unknown in both Origin and Destiny, then the counselor with whom we
seek self -
understanding takes on a new significance.
We have been
seeking to
understand the structure of human life as a history of personal relationships in
which God's grace works as transforming power.
His more general
understanding of Christian ~ experience has been colored by this personal frustration, with the result that he has reduced the Christian life to the mere memory of a past event (he labels this «Israel»)
which seeks to make its believers hard, tight, and controlled.
As we
seek to
understand man theologically, it is necessary to remember that any words
which express thoughts and feelings may have theological or religious content.
It can
seek to direct practice in terms of such critical self -
understanding and to engage in theoretical reflection
which is needed for the improved direction of practice.
Some interests driving a school's practices of governance and self - maintenance will tend to distort ideologically the practices through
which it
seeks to
understand God..
Fundamentally... the minister
seeks to
understand what the patient has experienced in his living
which has made it necessary for him to become mentally ill.
... A new
understanding of religion is re-emerging... one that emerges from the intrinsic coherence of the logos -
which is exactly the real faith in the gospel that the gospel itself
sought and proclaimed»
Such a view is plausible only on the assumption that the school's practices of teaching and learning through
which it
seeks to
understand God are relatively disengaged from its practices of governance and self - maintenance.
We
seek the emergence of an encompassing vision
which seemingly now lies beyond us, and I am fully persuaded that it will transcend everything
which is now manifest as either dialectical or di - polar
understanding.
Instead of trying to penetrate to the mind and will by physical methods, they
seek to
understand the individual man through the channel of speech communication
which constitutes one's only means of access to what, for convenience, we call the mind.
One aspect of God - talk, for example,
which is overdue for elimination is that
which tries to look for evidence of God in the areas of human ignorance, and
which seeks to use him as the explanation of all we do not
understand.
The philosophical «God» is
understood, if not independently of religious intuition, then definitely beyond its singular appearance (RM 88) 43 Over against the philosophical approach, Christianity developed the double strategy
which we have analyzed as «religious intuition» contributing finally to the formation of revelational theology:» (1) Christianity proceeded not from any metaphysics, but it «has always been a religion
seeking a metaphysics» (RM 50).45 Christianity strove for theological rationalization, 46 (2) Christianity, however, did not follow any certain metaphysics (PR 66 - 68), but «has been true to its genius for keeping its metaphysics subordinate to the religious fact to
which it appeals» (RM 69).
This scene captures the view of human being that gives coherence to The Human Quest: scientific
understanding is both exciting and necessary; human cultures are vulnerable systems whose survival is threatened, in the face of
which threat we
seek moral values embedded within our scientific knowledge.
It was not distorted as it was given, nor need it be distorted as we
seek to
understand it many centuries later in contexts far removed from those in
which it was originally given.
That insight had such significance for John Paul that he would return to it fourteen years later in Fides et Ratio, writing that the chief purpose of theology «is seen to be the
understanding of God's kenosis, a grand and mysterious truth for the human mind,
which finds it inconceivable that suffering and death can express a love
which gives itself and
seeks nothing in return.»
Not only must one view the individual patient as an operating biological organism, one must also
seek to
understand both the environing medium for that person,
which includes all other persons with whom functional activity occurs, and the specific culture that to a large extent shapes the perceptual patterns by
which that individual experiences the world.
In this way of stating it I sense a dynamic
which seeks to move beyond improved mutual
understanding; it
seeks to affect the life and witness of both communities.
For Albrecht Ritschl, Christ saves man by fulfilling his vocation to establish the universal ethical community in
which the spirit is victorious over the resistance of nature.2 Thus every theology
seeks a pattern in
which the atonement can be
understood.
That's why it is vital that we
understand the culture in
which we're ministering, and the stories with
which we
seek to connect our own.
Placher cites Frei's Barthian - like emphasis on the factual historicity that the gospel narrative contains, and, with Lindbeck, Placher argues that the relativity of our
understanding does not negate or preclude the reality of that
which we
seek to
understand.
I We
seek the emergence of an encompassing vision
which seemingly now lies beyond us, and I am fully persuaded that it will transcend everything
which is now manifest as either dialectical or di - polar
understanding.
Gnosticism is here
understood as that movement of the later Hellenistic world
which sought salvation from the whole cosmos regarded as, in principle, an alien and evil power.
Ah, so much is said about human want and misery — I
seek to
understand it, I have also had some acquaintance with it at close range; so much is said about wasted lives — but only that man's life is wasted who lived on, so deceived by the joys of life or by its sorrows that he never became eternally and decisively conscious of himself as spirit, as self, or (what is the same thing) never became aware and in the deepest sense received an impression of the fact that there is a God, and that he, he himself, his self, exists before this God,
which gain of infinity is never attained except through despair.
It is to be ascribed to a fact of
which the Socratic view itself was aware (though only to a certain degree) and
sought to remedy, that it lacks a dialectical determinant for the transition from having
understood something to the doing of it.
Rather it is to
seek ways
which will give to all of us an opportunity to live in fellowship despite our differences, and to
understand those differences in such a way that the fellowship can increase even though the differences do not decrease.
Any discipline, be it theology or philosophy,
which seeks to
understand the meaning of, purpose of, behaviour of, and relationship between the different constituent «beings» of this reality of ours should at least try to account for and incorporate an
understanding of that
which is observed in such a reality.
But these findings are valuable in precisely those areas
which most concern us if we
seek the some sort of
understanding of the historical Jesus as we have come to have of man in general — an
understanding or image succinctly expressed in Dr. Dillistone's lecture: «This image is a «dynamic, temporal one that sees man as first of all an agent, a self,» who stands self - revealed only in the midst of the density of temporal decisions.»
It's wonderful to see a work that starts from the Ultimate Reality and
seeks to
understand the Council from this depth in
which we live, move and have our being.
The text clearly teaches that nobody is righteous or does any good,
which sounds like Total Depravity, and that nobody
understands or
seeks after God,
which seems to infer total inability.
Faith,
which is trust in God without reservation not belief without proof, then
seeks understanding (
which is quite different from proof) through theological inquiry.
According to Romans 3, no one unaided by God 1) has any righteousness by
which to lay a claim upon God, 2) has any true
understanding of God, or 3)
seeks God (Boice and Ryken, Doctrines of Grace, 79).