To summarize, to literalize the apocalyptic passages in the New Testament, is to run counter to all we know of astronomy and the world of space; they are tied in with the then - current Jewish eschatology and Persian dualism
which saw evil in command of creation; as commonly accepted, they encourage passivity about the evils of the present world; they emphasize only one side of the message of Jesus to the exclusion of essential elements; they are grounded at least in part on a misconstruction of biblical poetry and drama.
Not exact matches
It is easier to write
see - no -
evil testimonials,
which all the inside players relish and court.
I
see the image of God in man through mans ability to form unseen thoughts into reality creating works of never ending wonder in the presence of
evil that seeks only to destroy that
which is good.
When we lose faith in the essential goodness of life and our own humanity,
seeing that
which we judge «
evil» to be more prevalent than that
which we judge to be «good», then we have lost faith in either the goodness or the power of God to sustain that goodness and our God has become too small or just another Baal, a false god of our own vain imaginings, a projection of our own finite limitations and disordered desires.
When we look at humanity we
see people committing
evil,
which we call sin.
15
See that no one repays another with
evil for
evil, but always seek after that
which is good for one another and for all people.
In conclusion it is appropriate to point out that God was always in control of the entire situation,
which is why such
evil that radiated from Satan was always limited by God's control (Job 1:12; 2:6), and the end
saw Satan condemned (Job 42:7 - 8), whilst upright Job was blessed (Job 42:12 - 17)
And Christian theology has always
seen this terrible, degrading death as a victory, indeed the victory by
which God vanquished the power of
evil once and for all.
The radical message of the God of the Bible is most clearly
seen in the cross
which tells us two things: 1) We are worse off than we want to admit (the
evil * we have done * means we ALL deserve to die — who killed Jesus?
That joy of being rescued opens our vision so we can
see the presence of God and the true reality beyond the natural (tree, good and
evil)
which includes God
The major Christian tradition has not been pacifism, in the sense of refusal to share in any war, but it has been a testimony for peace in the sense that war is
seen as a necessary
evil at best and never something in
which to glory.
«The consequent nature of God is added to meet the awful fact of
evil which Whitehead
sees and feels so keenly» Quoting from Process and Reality V, I, Wieman spoke of Whitehead's great sensitivity to the tragedy of the loss of beauty, richness, and value.
In you I don't
see the staunch
evil antagonism
which is visible in many atheists.
= NO Book of Jasher tells us that all the men who walked in the ways of the Lord died in those days, before the Lord brought the
evil upon man
which he declared, for this was from the Lord, that they should NOT
see the
evil which the Lord spoke of concerning the sons of men.
There is potential harm, however, in perpetuating a popular religion of «the Devil» in
which evil is
seen as being typically victorious over good in our daily lives.
Thus, to conscript Prof. Smolin for the purpose of understanding Arkes, «while it is typical of skeptics that they
see evil emanating from absolutes,» the warrant for that very judgment is one for
which their skepticism can not account.
Likewise, wrestle as we may with the problem of
evil, the heart of the matter is found in the great refrain of this Genesis story after the account of each «day» of creation,
which says, «And God
saw that it was good.»
You
see, you must use your own sense of good and
evil, or you can't know
which voice to listen to.
Such intention in the classic just war tradition, as we have
seen, includes the avoidance of wrong intentions,
which easily translate from Augustine's list into familiar contemporary
evils: aggressive war for the aggressor's sole benefit; wars for reasons based on religious, ethnic, or ideological difference; use of force aimed at terrorizing or oppressing those on whom it falls for the benefit of the wielder of power.
As far as I can
see thus far, though, they are Muslims with a few added layers of mumbo and jumbo and magic,
which doesn't automatically make them
evil, of course - just not the truth.
The renewal of the world is the Christian hope, and even though, because of our mortal limited lives, like Moses we do not live to witness the consummation, but
see it only in embryo, it is sufficient reward to have been used by God in this mighty process of the redemption of the world from the
evil, suffering and misery to
which man himself has contributed.
As a result, most of those who think and write about this problem do so from the standpoint of a choice between that attitude
which sees good and
evil as part of a higher unity and that
which sees them as irreconcilable opposites.
The prophetic allows «the
evil» to find the direction that leads toward God, and to enter into the good; the apocalyptic
sees good and
evil severed forever at the end of days, the good redeemed, the
evil unredeemable for all eternity; the prophetic believes that the earth shall be hallowed, the apocalyptic despairs of an earth
which it considers to be hopelessly doomed... (Moses, p. 188; Israel and the World, «The Power of the Spirit,» pp. 176 - 179.)
Although shadings from the two extremes exist and are recognized, neither side recognizes the independent reality of the position between — the dialectical attitude toward
evil which sees it as both real and redeemable.
The latter
sees social life as a cycle like the cycle of natural seasons
which is the basic framework for life; therefore nothing new enters the scene, and any creativity that affects the harmony of life and nature is considered a spiritual
evil.
That anti-humanity tone in churches is a carry - over from ancient Gnositicsm,
which saw all things material and earthly as
evil, and only what is spiritual and heavenly as good.
They came back to tell Moses the people were strong, and the cities walled and very great, and they made an
evil report to discourage the Jews: And there we
saw the giants, the sons of Anak,
which come of the giants, and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.
In what has been called the Classic Idea of the atonement, 12 the cross is
seen as the last, decisive battle - ground between God and all the spiritual powers of
evil, a conflict in
which God, through his Son Jesus Christ, won a final and eternal victory against all the
evil that threatens and plagues men.
Basically, what has happened with CST is comparable to what has happened with marriage and family: We spend a lot of time talking about contraception and abortion and bioethical dilemmas, and unfortunately we must do so, given the gravity of these
evils and the obsessions of our day — but as a result we can fail to
see, or at least fail to communicate to others, the profound truth of the sacrament of matrimony,
which is the foundation of all the rules and prohibitions.
It is a long way from such an ideal of political activity to the actualities in
which it is carried on; but it is essential to our human attempt to live together to
see that the «game of politics» is not merely a necessary
evil but that it has at its best a link with legitimate good.
He
saw an apocalyptic pattern in history in
which good does not overcome
evil in history but grows alongside it to the end.
But for the most part, the author admits the
evils embedded in Greek civilization, among
which one can easily name the constricted life of most women, the demagoguery of so many politicians, and worst of all the degradation of the slave's life (he quotes the medical writer Galen who once
saw an owner poke his slave's eye out with a reed pen).
The Revelation
sees the whole universe as the scene of the battle between God and the Devil, between Christ and Antichrist, between good and
evil, a struggle
which will continue to the end of time.
A good example: I've been playing a videogame of late with a combination Greek / fantasy pantheon in
which the player - character is a very faithful servant of a particular goddess, knows other gods exist (because killing them / beating them up is the main plot of the game), and winds up with an ally who can clearly
see that the gods exist but only cares about following himself — so there's a mix there of misotheism with a few of the gods (they are there, but they're
evil), faithful worship (serving a good goddess), and nay theism («You gods are selfish jerks, I'm going my own way!»).
Thus, as most FWTs
see it, the relevant question is
which of the following pictures of God is most appealing: (1) a God who creates individuals who only think they are free but are actually controlled by God and thus produce no
evil or (2) a God who bestows actual freedom on individuals even though such freedom may produce (has produced) much
evil along with much good.
Cardinal Bourne noted that war was «one of the greatest material
evils that the world can
see, but our Divine Master has warned us that it is an
evil for
which we must be prepared».
If you've
seen any of the trailers for John Krasinski's new horror film A Quiet Place (
which he stars in and directed), then you know that the plot revolves around a family that must live in silence to avoid detection from some sort of
evil force.
Rom 1:28 And just as they did not
see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things
which are not proper, Rom 1:29 being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed,
evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, Rom 1:30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of
evil, disobedient to parents, Rom 1:31 without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; Rom 1:32 and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them.
We walked directly past some of the
evil beings,
which didn't seem to
see us, and stopped at another pit of fire and brimstone.
Jeremy I believe you answered the question in another discussion why God seemed
evil by punishing other nations i prefer the word you used
which is judgement.God weighs up the hearts and then judges fairly thats not
evil in fact he weighs up all the factors before he makes his decision and his decisions are perfect and wise.When he commanded Israel to wipe out other nations it was Gods judgement on these nations because of the
evil they had committed in alot of ways its exaggerated because they did nt have Christ to shield them like we have if anything it shows how merciful God is towards us today.In those days gods judgement was quick and immediate.What happened to Israel when they broke the laws God gave them they immediately fell into judgement often resulting in many deaths to there own people until the sins of the people were dwelt with.So even for Gods people it was a conditional on there attitude and actions towards God.Again we
see God is merciful to these previous nations that were destroyed as Christ after his crucifiction went and preached to them giving them the opportunity to repent so again we
see God is still merciful.His word is true The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness.
28 And just as they did not
see fit [u] to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things
which are not proper, 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed,
evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, 30 slanderers, [v] haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of
evil, disobedient to parents, 31 without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; 32 and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them.
Rom 1:28 And just as they did not
see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things
which are not proper, Rom 1:29 being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed,
evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, Rom 1:30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of
evil, disobedient to parents, Rom 1:31 without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; Rom 1:32 and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty
And God
saw what they had done, that they repented from their
evil ways, and God was sorry about the
evil which He had declared to do to them, and He did not do it.
His first postulate is that doing good is nothing more than avoiding
evil, while his second is that in a Demiurge - ruled universe there is always available to an elite a trustworthy perspective in
which anyone and everything at any time can be
seen as nothing but
evil.
That
which is good and moral will be
seen as
evil.
The modern, secular version of this view
sees evil as a product of human institutions and social structures
which can be overcome by human solutions.
Movies such as
Saw, Seven, and The Collection reveal some of the depths to
which the
evil in men's hearts can go.
This is chiefly to be
seen in the frequent reference to angels, the personification of the cosmic power of
evil in Satan, the story of the Ascension, and the birth stories of Jesus, both of
which are expressed in terms of traffic between heaven and earth.
But it is
seen in relationship to the basic activity
which is God himself who is able both to bring good out of
evil and at the same time to rejoice in the good
which is achieved in the creation.
It is significant that Vatican II (and also the Uppsala Assembly of the World Council of Churches) defines the church as the sacramental sign of the unity of all humanity, and also speaks of the presence of the Paschal Mystery among all peoples (
see Decree on the Church, and the document on the Pastoral Constitution of the Church in the Modern World) This approach assumes that in Christianity, acknowledgment of Salvation (understood as the transcendent ultimate destiny of human beings) finds expression and witness in the universal struggle for Humanization (understood as the penultimate human destiny) in world history
which is shaped not only by the forces of goodness and life, but also by the forces of
evil and death.