Sentences with phrase «which side of the dispute»

This has, in turn, other consequences: freedom, tolerance, and fairness are necessary if we recognize that there is a common truth to which both sides of a dispute are loyal.

If it's true that Hachette is not showing up at the negotiating table, they're the ones the AG should be talking to but it's clear which side of the dispute that the AG falls on.

No matter which side of the dispute you are on and how much is at stake, you can never have enough knowledge of your legal rights and available choices.

Not exact matches

Kerrisdale Park is definitely the right side of the tracks, but residents were dismayed earlier this year when CP Rail announced that, after 15 years of dispute with the City of Vancouver, it would again begin routing trains through the Arbutus Corridor, which bounds this neighbourhood on its North and West sides.

Asked whether Qatar - which has maintained aviation links with Iran during a separate political dispute between Qatar and its neighbors on the Arab side of the Gulf - had seen business suffer due to uncertainty over the nuclear pact, Al Baker said:

The fact that First Things published a long article on my book Mercy: The Essence of the Gospel and the Key to Christian Existence is an honor even when the article is a critique, which — as usual in academic disputes — needs critique from my side as well («What Mercy Is,» March).

Looking at this side of the ambiguity, we see a church in which many first - world Christians of our day could feel comfortable and undisturbed: a church that lives without question or resistance in a state founded on violence and made prosperous by the exploitation of less fortunate nations; a church that accepts various perquisites from that state as its due; a church where changing jobs for the sake of peace and justice is seldom considered; a church that constantly speaks in the language of war; a church given to eloquent invective in its internal disputes and against outside opponents; a church quite sure that God will punish the wicked.

This is the method of the «double rejection,» of challenging both sides of the usual two - cornered dispute with the aim at descrying a genuinely new position in which the legitimate motives in each of the older ones are given their due.

A model of arbitration was set up in which the women from warring sides of a conflict would arbitrate the dispute, with the women from the aggrieved nation defining the situation, while the women from the aggressor nation would accept and announce this criticism of their own government.

The Kingdom of God is a reality here and now, but can be perfect only in the eternal order... The primary principle of Christian Ethics and Christian Politics must be respect for every person simply as a person... The person is primary, not the society; the State exists for the citizen, not the citizen for the State... freedom is the goal of politics... Freedom, Fellowship, Service — these are the three principles of a Christian social order, derived from the more fundamental Christian postulates that Man is a child of God and is destined for a life of eternal fellowship with Him... Love... finds its primary expression through Justice — which in the field of industrial disputes means in practice that each side should state its own case as strongly as possibly it can before the most impartial tribunal available...

Both sides agreed — in the vague language, which lies at the heart of the Siachen dispute — that the Ceasefire Line extends to the terminal point, NJ 9842, and «thence north to the glaciers.»

But environmentalists dispute the legitimacy of the discussions, which they say are one - sided and a whitewash, and have decided to disrupt them wherever they can.

Regardless of the type of legal proceeding or which side uses scientific evidence, the forensic scientist must be able to write a report and testify under oath about: what facts or items of evidence were analyzed or tested; what tests or analyses were used; how valid or reliable those tests or analyses have been found to be by other courts; why and how the forensic scientist was qualified to conduct those tests or analyses; and, what the results of the tests or analyses were and how those results are relevant to the issues in dispute.

In a case that could shape the outcome of special education disputes across the country, the Supreme Court will decide in Schaffer v. Weast (Case No. 04 - 698) which side bears the burden of proof in disputes over children's individualized education programs, or IEPs.

It is devoid of snark, very fair minded in recognizing potential problems with unwarranted «tenacity» on all sides, and does a great job is isolating the actual substantive matters which apply for anyone aspiring to be an honest broker in these disputes.

(Thomson Reuters Foundation)-- Since India's Jammu and Kashmir state was hit in September by its worst - ever floods, which also affected people on Pakistan's side of the disputed border, the two rival nations are under growing pressure to put aside their differences to protect Kashmiris from rising disaster threats.

In the meantime, I figure if people on either side of dispute want me to understand their position, they can write an overview which actually explains matters.

Or you might look at misbehavior which is all too common in ordinary pseudoscience disputes, but which in the physical and biological sciences is very uncommon on the funded academic side: e.g., triumphalism about unfalsifiable claims, and circling the wagons around various kinds of data hiding (e.g., remarkably lackadaisical formal investigation of CRU even after FOIA violations, and broad enthusiasm for promoting the formal results into an informal full «nothing to see here, move along» exoneration).

On Monday, Alito wrote the opinion in Zedner v. United States, a case in which the Court sided unanimously with a criminal defendant in a dispute over interpretation of the Speedy Trial Act.

-- Courts are the governmental «default» option — if you don't provide for ADR in advance through a dispute resolution clause in your business contract, then in the event of a dispute (at which point the two sides usually can't agree to anything), parties typically resort to court, thereby subjecting themselves to the considerable expense, risk, delay, distraction, inflexibility, and often irrationality of the court systems.

The challenge of the legal system is not just to resolve disputes, but to decide a fair resolution between two sides, both of which have merit.

In Canada, the losing side of a dispute will be asked to pay legal costs to the winning side, which can typically include lawyer's fees and disbursements.

Chicago labor and employment partner Frank Saibert authored this column about a decision in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit which sided with a big - box retailer in a dispute with union representatives who were arrested for trespassing at the store.

Since the 2004 CCH decision, the scope of fair dealing, and its role in Canadian copyright law has been a persistent and contentious dispute, one around which the sides have been clearly drawn.

As the story goes, these parties had a falling out and as a result decided that since neither side was likely to receive a «fair» hearing and decision under the Russian justice system, and since billions of US dollars, etc. were brought to Britain, why not use the British legal system (which UK government has been promoting for years for these kinds of disputes).

These can sometimes provide useful nuggets of information which either side in the dispute will latch on to.

Cohen points out that while panels of experts from both sides of a dispute are sometimes used in tribunals and other administrative bodies, this is not at all the case for auto accident insurance disputes in Ontario, which is widely viewed as skewed in favour of insurers.

You should be aware that litigation is a dispute resolution model in which each side fights for his or her client against the other side toward the impossible goal of «winning.»

Staff splitting involves a parallel process in the treatment team to the splitting dynamic of the borderline patient, in which polar sides develop within the treatment team regarding the borderline patient so that the treatment team becomes divided by internal arguments and disputes regarding the borderline patient.

By providing a forum in which the parties can tell their sides of the story in a nonconfrontational way, the mediation officer helps find common ground on which to resolve the dispute.

I have been to countless investment seminars on both sides of the border, and I must admit the common thread Canadian buyers seek, which you can't dispute is a consistent rental income.

Both sides allege improper intent; this dispute has more to do with public perception than it does with legalities, of which the public does not care, will not care, if it understands said legalities collectively.