Sentences with phrase «which such big impacts»

Not exact matches

The change would have the biggest impact on the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which oversees Wall Street firms such as Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley.

The study brings out and develops such theology and so gives us a good opportunity to discuss ideas which have made and are likely to continue to make a big impact upon the Church.

Moreover, hard feelings about the process may persist, which could impact negotiations in other big landmark legislation such as tax reform.

While it is challenging to assess the overall impact on the population of such a wide ranging and elusive big cat, the virus contributed to the decline of one well - studied sub-population, which went from 38 individuals to 9 between the years 2007 and 2012.

Health improvement (allowing to post - pone / escape the diseases and thus live, healthier / disease - free longer, but not above human MLSP of around 122 years; thus these therapies do not affect epigenetic aging whatsoever, they are degenerative aging problems not regular healthy aging problem (except OncoSENS - only when you Already Have Cancer - which cancer increases epigenetic aging, but cancer removal thus does not change anything / makes no difference about what happens in the other cells / about what happens in the normal epigenetic «aging» course in Normal non-cancerous healthy cells) Although there is not such thing as «healthy aging» all aging in «unhealthy» (as seen from elders who are «healthy enough» who show much damage), it's just «tolerable / liveable» enough (in terms of damage accumulating) that it does not affect their quality of life (enough yet), that is «healthy aging»: ApoptoSENS - Clearing Senescent Cells (this will have great impact to reduce diseases, the largest one, since it's all inflammation fueled by the inflammation secretory phenotype (SASP) of these senescent cells) AmyloSENS - Dissolving the Plaques (this will allow humans to evade Alzheimer's, Parkinsons and general brain degenerescence, allowing quite a boost; making people much more easily reach the big 100 - since the brain is causal to how long we live; keeping brain amyloid - free and keeping our memories / neuron sharp / means longer LongTerm Potentiation - means longer brain function means longer heavy brain mass (gray matter / white matter retention seen in «sharp - witted» Centenarians who show are younger brain for their age), and both are correlated to MLSP).

The fact that Kubrick's iconic films so often top best film and director polls across the media show that this his exclusion from the ranks of Best Director award holders is one of the Academy's biggest mistakes, especially when considering the films it lost out to such as My Fair Lady and One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, which are well respected but not really on a par in terms of Kubrick's directorial skills, and neither George Cukor or Milos Forman have made a directorial impact elsewhere.

Sometimes this occurs the day before a big event that will impact the markets (such as a U.S. government shutdown deadline or a monthly jobs report), and investors become nervous and are willing to pay more for options (which causes the VIX to increase).

Whether you (or Edim) personally want to worry about these things is up to you, my point is that there are plenty of potential effects of climate change which would not fall into the «abrupt and irreversible» category but could still cause big problems if they occur, so just because the particular outcomes the IPCC classifies as such may not happen this century it doesn't logically mean we won't suffer serious impacts in the shorter term.

Of course, such findings don't of themselves say a lot but require comparing firstly with what is expected of the AMOC under AGW (IPCC AR5 put it as 1 - 24 % drop by 2100 under RCP2.6 and 12 - 54 % under RCP8.6, all with the «low confidence» sticker) and secondly what would be the resulting impact on global climate which is a bit of a big ask as it would all be wrapped up with other AGW impacts.

These previous mass extinction events (also known as the «Big Five») are hypothesised to have been caused by combinations of key events such as unusual climate change, changes in atmospheric composition, and abnormally high stress on the ecosystem (except in the case of the Cretaceous, which was caused by an asteroid impact and subsequent effects).

The insurance industry must also be alert to the fact that there are multiple potential benefits linked to big data analytics and processes, but there are also a number of growing risks, such as privacy issues and cyber threats, which may have a significant reputational impact on the insurer and the sector if they were to materialise, apart from other consequences attached to regulatory breaches.