Sentences with phrase «which support your claim»

Ancel Keys cherrypicked the 7 countries out of 22 which supported his claims.
Dr. McDougall's website has an article or newsletter or one of his «hot topics», in which he supports his claim that the people eating the traditional Japanese diet with fish are healthy in spite of eating the fish, not because of it.
optional Enclosed is proof < include a copy of check used for payment, an old statement proving a closed account, etc. > which supports my claim.
This is the sort of event which supports the claim that wind and solar require 100 % backup.
For those lakes that have data up until the last few years, there clearly is a diversity of recent freeze / melt times for the lakes, but there is no obvious demonstration of a systematic later freeze / earlier melts which supports the claim in the IPCC SPM.
I have searched your site, but can not find any reference to any «science» which supports the claims that climate change will cause the following, which is «not based on computer modelling»:
The facts which support your claim of injury must be specific enough to allow the governmental entity the ability to conduct a proper investigation.
A medical certificate which supports your claim is a definite requirement.
In marketing, to be competitive, you show your product as the superior choice, using information which supports your claims to the position.

Not exact matches

The Ex-Im Bank, which provides credit insurance for businesses who extend terms to overseas customers, has been a political football of late, with conservative politicians claiming the bank overwhelmingly supports big businesses over small ones.
Governments, for their part, must establish the needed incentives, like a carbon tax, which many oil and gas companies claim to support.
They've hired more than 100 staffers to beef up community management and development of technology to support the site's more users, which they claim number more than 350 million.
After some customers took to Apple support forums to complain of the company not replacing batteries for $ 29, a French publication named iGeneration claims to have obtained internal documentation sent to Apple Stores that details which iPhones are eligible for the offer.
Liberal finance critic Scott Brison says his party is also unlikely to support a budget with corporate tax cuts, which he claims «we can't afford and we don't need.»
In fact, just 9 percent of students studying business claim they received such support, which is half the rate of kids who took up the arts and humanities.
Ellison said that Oracle's cloud computing strategy takes into account the idea that customers want to use a mix of their own data centers, as well as those from providers, an idea that some refer to as a «hybrid cloud,» which Microsoft has also claimed it supports.
«This case has already been dismissed with prejudice by the court that heard it, which ruled in Yelp's favor and also found the claims not to be supported by credible evidence,» Vince Sollitto, Yelp's vice president of communications said.
The report suggests that civilians have been detained merely because they were suspected of supporting varying sides of the Ukrainian conflict, which began in April 2014 and has claimed more than 9,400 lives.
The FDA has applied the same kind of scrutiny to claims that marijuana - derived products can help prevent, treat, or cure cancer (claims which aren't supported by any existing scientific evidence).
You provide no supporting evidence for your claim, whereas the website you criticize (which is NOT mine) simply quotes prominent environmental activists, «in their own words».
Libyan sources claim that the militias are supported by the GNA, which is headed by Libyan leader Fayez Sarraj.
For example, HomeKit for smart home features appears to be gaining more vendor support, the announcement mentions ESPN as a media partner which likely will be followed by many more in the category, and SiriKit integration is claiming integration with Evernote and other productivity apps.
Kogan said that the data he collected likely couldn't have been very useful in a targeting political campaign, a claim which has been supported by media reports.
Under Andresen's definition, which you can check out here, any one of the three versions could claim the throne as long as they have a majority of community and industry support.
Adopt a Unit's mission extends from partnering with veteran service organizations to hosting spouse support groups like Military Mondays, which provides veterans with pro bono legal assistance related to housing, education, employment, disability claims and healthcare issues.
The Minister claimed that the «International Monetary Fund's annual review of Canada's economic developments and policies, which strongly supports the Government's plan to return to balanced budgets over the medium term».
He then goes on to assert that it is simply not true that strength and weakness in gold stocks tells us anything about the future performance of gold, which as anyone with a little bit of experience in trading this sector knows is incorrect, even if he tries to support his claim with presumably carefully cherry - picked statistics.
You do a great disservice to both Atheism and Skepticism with your pseudo-intellectual claims for which you provide no support.
''... the Zionists with the support of the Ottoman Empire settled in Palestine, then the Jews claimed independence from the ottoman empire and retained control of that part od Palestine which is now Israel...» My understanding was that the Allies took control of Palestinian lands after they defeated the Central Powers, including the Ottoman Empire, in WWI.
The fossil record simply does not support the evolutionary theory, which claims there once existed a series of successive forms leading to the present - day organism.
To that assessment this essay will contribute modestly by arguing (1) that an account of experience must be compatible with the fact that there is no one thing which is what experience is or is the essence of experience, (2) that no philosophically adequate account of what experience is can be established merely by appeal to direct, personal, intuitive experience of one's own experience, (3) that generalization from features found in human experience is not sufficient to justify the claim that temporality is essential to experience, but (4) that dialectical argument rather than intuition or generalization is necessary to support the claim that experience is essentially temporal.
Unfortunately for you, not only is there absolutely no evidence whatsoever to support any of these claims, the existence of any such God leads to numerous questions and apparent inconsistencies for which none of you can provide convincing answers.
1st, not having support is completely different from killing Jesus, which I'm still looking for some examples of, since that was the original claim, thus far unsubstantiated.
Among them are the rights to: bullet joint parenting; bullet joint adoption; bullet joint foster care, custody, and visitation (including non-biological parents); bullet status as next - of - kin for hospital visits and medical decisions where one partner is too ill to be competent; bullet joint insurance policies for home, auto and health; bullet dissolution and divorce protections such as community property and child support; bullet immigration and residency for partners from other countries; bullet inheritance automatically in the absence of a will; bullet joint leases with automatic renewal rights in the event one partner dies or leaves the house or apartment; bullet inheritance of jointly - owned real and personal property through the right of survivorship (which avoids the time and expense and taxes in probate); bullet benefits such as annuities, pension plans, Social Security, and Medicare; bullet spousal exemptions to property tax increases upon the death of one partner who is a co-owner of the home; bullet veterans» discounts on medical care, education, and home loans; joint filing of tax returns; bullet joint filing of customs claims when traveling; bullet wrongful death benefits for a surviving partner and children; bullet bereavement or sick leave to care for a partner or child; bullet decision - making power with respect to whether a deceased partner will be cremated or not and where to bury him or her; bullet crime victims» recovery benefits; bullet loss of consortium tort benefits; bullet domestic violence protection orders; bullet judicial protections and evidentiary immunity; bullet and more...
In point of fact Christianity is an elaborate web of such theories and claims, none of which is supported by any objective evidence.
Stark invites the reader to «consider whether you believe any of the following statements...» (p. 4) which include: claims of anti-semitism; the Church's suppression of «new Christian Gospels» and of scientists; persecution of pagans; the «blood bath» of the Spanish Inquisition; and the Church's support of slavery.
You claimed science proves the Bible wrong as to Joshua's account of the moon and sun stopping which is false and can not be supported by science (including Newton's law which you interjected)
«Some have also claimed that early Christianity supported a form of communism through the teachings in the New Testament which emphasized sharing amongst everyone equally.
In fact it's more disgusting if someone claims to represent God and then molests or child, protects those who do, or contines to support the organization which hides this type of behavior.
I am going to DEMAND that you specify WHICH scripture I have perverted even though I have provided ZERO scriptural claims to back up my claims of biblical support for my view in the first place.
One way to begin to free ourselves from the bondage of power that we put on others and put upon ourselves is to unravel the theology and Scripture texts which have been used to support our claim to power and authority.
Which facts do you disagree with, what evidence do you have to support your contentions and where did I claim to be superior to anyone?
Your claim that things supported by scripture is based on your belief that the bible is the inerrant, infallible word of god, which is your opinion.
Christianity has a single source - the bible - and makes claims of fantastical events which are not supported by physical evidence or even non-biblical accounts.
That he would not have used passages which he had cherry picked from the Old Testament to then shoe - horn Jesus into these passages, making things up about Jesus, all to support the Christian claim that Jesus was the messiah.
The truth is that there is no «evidence» «logic» or «fact» to support either claim — both require equal amounts of faith (regardless of which God you believe in).
Scientism claims that the natural world is all there is, that supernatural explanations of the world are irrational, that everything can be reduced to physical causes, and that the only things we can know as true are those which Science reveals — supported by evidence, submitted to experimentation, and reviewed by peers.
Too many people are affirming its authority by claiming its support for interpretations which a more adequate hermeneutic will reject.
@godfreenow In logic, an argument is made when a claim is supported by a set of premises, which both support the other one.
At least that must be the conclusion if his claim is to be supported merely by conformation and reproduction, which ultimately involve nothing more than the transmission of character.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z