As I subscribed to more streams, it was hard to get an exact picture of
which twitterers were providing value and which ones weren't, though it was clear that I skipped over a lot more tweets than were useful.
Not exact matches
The most straightforward is to use an «@reply,» in
which you reference another
Twitterer in your own post (i.e., «@epolitics why don't you just shut up about this crap»).
That's the insight given by a new technique for ranking
twitterers,
which has been used to create a chart of the top 100 news - media Twitter feeds.
The source of this information is none - other than Twitter,
which appears to have taken over the world, via
Twitterer (is that even a word?!)
It may be different in the world of the solo practitioner,
which I'm not very familiar with, but I seriously doubt even the «best» individual lawyer -
Twitterers from big law firms would suffer too much if they walked away from Twitter tomorrow.