Sentences with phrase «which were in existence»

The question of qualified immunity would depend on the Florida cases interpreting the mask statute which were in existence at the time of the arrest.

In some traditions it is also mentioned that the king invested the Christians with royal honours inscribed on copper plates which were in existence till the 16th century but after that the whereabouts of the plates are not known.

I don't see why most of us will insult each other because of wenger or arsenal which was in existence be4 most of us were born and probably won't knw anything abt us till death

Server virtualization is a technology which is in existence for a decade, but some still consider this as something new.

communications relating to an existing business relationship or a relationship which was in existence within two years of sending the message (unless consent for same is earlier revoked); and,

Not exact matches

While it's unclear so far which group, exactly, will be leading the charge, Inc. has confirmed the existence of at least one: BayShare, which describes itself as an «advocacy organization in the San Francisco Bay Area whose mission is to make the Bay Area the best place on the planet for sharing.»

One day, it might be green plants and bouncy music; the next, it might be a fully customizable desk, telecommuting or living in Switzerland — all of which have been touted in recent research as ingredients for a pleasurable work existence.

«This is all going to force people in the industry to justify their existence, which is why they're fighting to the death,» says Toronto broker and entrepreneur Lawrence Dale.

A lawsuit brought against Sater and others in 2015, which is ongoing, alleges that «for most of its existence it [Bayrock] was substantially and covertly mob - owned and operated,» engaging «in a pattern of continuous, related crimes, including mail, wire, and bank fraud; tax evasion; money laundering; conspiracy; bribery; extortion; and embezzlement.»

More surprising than the devices» existence, though, are the ways in which some companies are putting them to use.

We have by the end of this year, which is the second full year of it being in existence, we will achieve about roughly 500,000, and in the next eight years another 4-1/2 million.

The New York Times on Tuesday reported the existence of the mortgage settlement talks, including one discussion in which a roughly $ 20 billion fine was briefly floated.

While the existence of a term sheet doesn't mean that negotiations no longer take place, it does provide assurances that everyone is generally on the same page and that the drawn up legal documents won't have to be heavily revised (which can potentially save a lot of money in legal fees).

In 1950, United Fruit (nowadays Chiquita) hired Robert H. Stover to devise management strategies for Fusarium wilt, which by then was threatening the very existence of the export trade based on Gros Michel.

Additionally, with more than 1,000 crypto - currencies currently in existence, even if we accept the assumption that they have staying power, identifying which one will be «the winner» is far from a sure thing.

Motorola, which has been in existence for 80 years, is one of the oldest mobile phone makers on the market.

The Bitcoin protocol offers robust anonymity, and the protocol guarantees that there will never be more than 21 million Bitcoins in existence, which supporters have argued would give the currency a stable value.

The value of a Bitcoin is determined in part by supply and demand — the system is set up so that there are only a finite number of Bitcoins in existence, which prevents the problem of people just «printing» more Bitcoins the way crumbling governments have in places like Germany in the 1920s.

In early January, the China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC) published regulations that limit the number of commercial banks in which each investor can own holdings, which is intended to reduce specific cases of «disorder» in the banking sector, such as the abuse of rights by major shareholders and the existence of «invisible shareholders»In early January, the China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC) published regulations that limit the number of commercial banks in which each investor can own holdings, which is intended to reduce specific cases of «disorder» in the banking sector, such as the abuse of rights by major shareholders and the existence of «invisible shareholders»in which each investor can own holdings, which is intended to reduce specific cases of «disorder» in the banking sector, such as the abuse of rights by major shareholders and the existence of «invisible shareholders»in the banking sector, such as the abuse of rights by major shareholders and the existence of «invisible shareholders».

Bitcoin Cash - which was once the «new kid in the block» came into existence in mid-2017 and has since been on quite a r...

We, on the other hand, view it with hope: because more than anything, the events of the past few days show that the truth is getting out — the truth that capital markets simply can not exist under the authoritarian rule of central planners, the truth that the stock market is a casino in which the best one can hope for a quick flip, and finally the truth that our entire socio - economic regime, whose existence has been predicated by borrowing from the uncreated wealth of the future, and where accumulated debt could be wiped out at the flip of a switch if things go wrong in the process obliterating the welfare of billions (of less than 1 % ers), is one big lie.

All this because money must have some characteristics (in order to be considered money) which necessitate the existence of banks:

Secondly, while the total number of Bitcoins in existence is at 21 million, that of Litecoin is set at 84 million, which is practically four times the number of Bitcoin.

Disproving the existence of something for which there is little evidence is not feasible, so I am content in knowing, that given our current understanding of the universe, it is highly unlikely.

You actually do believe in something that has no evidence in support of your belief (i.e. you believe in a possibility of something outside existence which is an impossibility)

I have experienced God to be exactly as represented in the Bible which brought about a radical transformation to my existence.

It is like saying there is not smoke with out fire, like sighting a droppings and trail of foot prints you would realize that a camel and passenger passed the desert then the seeing of the greatness of the mountains and passages through them, the seas great waves the skies it helps to realize the existence of super power «GOD» above all... any way it is like the verses written in the Quran «GOD «Allah speaking about how he had created earth to man by the mountains, seas and rain from skies which brings life to earth..

This seems largely to be the work of the devil; but I also suspect that it is in part an effect of the existence of pacifism, as a doctrine which many people respect though they would not adopt it.

I n S h o r t: The vital substances in this vast pharmacy of the universe, which are measured on the scales of Divine Determining and Decree of the All-Wise and Pre-Eternal One, can only come into existence through a boundless wisdom, infinite knowledge and all - encompassing will.

You see only the world of the serpent (doubt in Gods purpose for your existence) which is limited to the physical.

Abraham Geiger, a major thinker in the nineteenth - century Reform movement, declared that the idea of a postmortem existence «should not be expressed in terms which suggest a future revival, a resurrection of the body; rather they must stress the immortality of the soul.»

you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.

Then we will see that our actual existence is, from the viewpoint of the inherited ontology of nature and grace, «mixed» from its origin and at every step, «a pilgrimage in which the miracle of divine love... is the most ordinary of events.»

Moreover, the Northern European Jewish thinkers who advocated this view (unlike their contemporary counterparts in Spain) were in no wise adherents of Aristotelian philosophy and its natural theology, which argued that God's existence could be demonstrated outside of historical revelation.

As seems Mr.Stephen Hawking had suffered a lot from early age and from age of 21 to 69 tied to a chair facing death every day, had no chance to live a natural loving life... towards which he had been in the state of denial towards God existence for not having his pleadings answered...?

They say then that it is more simple to believe at once in the eternal pre-existence of the world, as it is now going on, and may for ever go on by the principle of reproduction which we see and witness, than to believe in the eternal pre-existence of an ulterior cause, or Creator of the world, a being whom we see not, and know not, of whose form substance and mode or place of existence, or of action no sense informs us, no power of the mind enables us to delineate or comprehend.

If something has fine - tuned the parameters, that could indicate the existence of an intelligent fine - tuner — but this is pretty much guesswork: it could as easily be that the parameters vary slightly over very large distances, in which case life would be expected to turn up in those regions of the universe that are suited for life.

In view of its inability to evade assuming self - existence somewhere, «even that which is commonly regarded as the negation of all religion — even positive Atheism comes within the definition» of religion

Without pretending to be scientific about it, the world may be imagined to be a vast collection of existences — things and substances of various compositions and kinds — each of which is what it is, and moves, changes, grows, or decays as it does by reason of its relation to other things: things existing in various ways by, and in some cases, at the expense of, or on, other things.

There's a few nice things said about early Christians helping their neighbors and giving the poor hope that the afterlife will bring them a better existence, which is positive in a sort of back - handed way... I suppose.

@ talullah: it sounds like your objection is to the very existence of chaplains, and not simply the way in which a chaplain performs his / her job.

(By the way, we believe in pre-mortal existence where we were born as spirit children, which we also believe in every living thing having a soul two but anyways thats not revelant...) Which was when they were at the «drawing board» of the plan of Earth and everything and how they were going to do everything i.e. who was going to be the savior (because every body needs an atonement so we can go back and repwhich we also believe in every living thing having a soul two but anyways thats not revelant...) Which was when they were at the «drawing board» of the plan of Earth and everything and how they were going to do everything i.e. who was going to be the savior (because every body needs an atonement so we can go back and repWhich was when they were at the «drawing board» of the plan of Earth and everything and how they were going to do everything i.e. who was going to be the savior (because every body needs an atonement so we can go back and repent).

Christians can not imagine that anyone could possibly contemplate death without having the «assurance» that a beautiful heavenly existence awaits them, but in fact most true atheists (as opposed to those who are simply indifferent, which is a growing segment of the population) have given this quite a bit of thought and have come to a different conclusion.

Athiests profess that they do not believe in a diety or the afterlife, which by extension implies that their existence ends with their death — the time you have on earth is all the time you get.

They also should not place their faith in the existence of an imaginary afterlife, the concept of which is based on wishful thinking.

The importance of encounter of person with immediate existence, the accommodation to this place and this time, which is so heavy a theme in recent literature of the American South, is exactly the issue, though reduced in its implications whenever frozen in our accounting for it by a reduction to mere history or geography.

Now, hypothetically, if you personally maintained belief in a supreme being (one in which you had no verifiable proof of its existence, but yet what you considered ample evidence to place your faith in) and that being had communicated morality in absolute terms, would you define that morality as subjective or objective?

1) nothing in this physical universe is the reason for its own existence 2) A causal chain exists 3) no causal chain is of infinite length 4) Only the supernatural (that which exists outside of physical reality) can be the ultimate cause of all physical reality 5) That supernatural cause could not itself have a cause, because infinite causal chains do not exist 6) This eternal, supernatural enti.ty we call, God.

Officially, the Catholic Church instructs, «The existence of the State of Israel and its political options should be envisaged not in a perspective which is in itself religious, but in their reference to the common principles of international law,» in the formula given in «Notes on the Correct Way to Present the Jews and Judaism in Preaching and Catechesis in the Roman Catholic Church» (1985).

One of Hart's most striking dismissals of the conflation of God and the gods is where he defines belief in «a personal God» or «theistic personalism» as a kind of «monopolytheism,» which «differs from polytheism... solely in that it posits the existence of only one such being.»