And surface temps are updated monthly,
while OHC data are updated quarterly.
It's perfectly possible that ocean variability keeps the atmospheric temperature approximately constant for significant periods
while the OHC keeps on rising.
Not exact matches
While the TOA observations show far less agreement with the NODC and Hadley Centre
OHC data sets, after 2004 they demonstrate moderate agreement with PMEL / JPL / JIMAR data sets (as determined by statistical analysis).
A 50cc
OHC four - stroke engine provides ample power for around - town trips
while also keeping the fun factor high and sipping fuel.
He plucks out of context a sentence about
OHC while ignoring the central argument we are making about that indicator — which is that if most of the heat is going into the oceans and we now have substantially better ways to measure
OHC then why not use that measure.
@Matthew Marler (51)--
OHC since 1950,
while subject to some uncertainty, is sufficiently characterized to know it's strongly positive, which excludes a more than minor role for internal contributions to the warming.
In Balmaseda et al. paper, they show very nicely the changes in the ocean heat content (
OHC) since the late 1950s and how during the last decade the
OHC has substantially increased in the deep ocean
while in the first 300 and 700 meters it has stalled.
In particular, as discussed above, internal climate oscillations warm the surface by losing
OHC,
while external forcing by CO2 or other modalities warms the surface by increasing
OHC.
According to the graphs he presents on his blog - o - site, in his favorite Case III version 0 - 50m
OHC has been dropping
while Levitus shows it rising.
So
while their conclusions may be valid: yes there is no evidence of a discrepancy, given their uncertainties, and yes there is no «statistically significant» decline in
OHC rates of change, but the uncertainties are so large that neither dataset is useful to know what is really going on, and that is the key point.
You ostensibly believe CO2 dominates despite not having the requisite scientific evidence to back up that assertion, not to mention paleoclimate data which heartily contradicts it (i.e., CO2 levels rose
while ocean heat content declined, or
OHC rose rapidly
while CO2 levels were constant).
OHC 0 — 700m trends strongly upward
while TSI falls...?
The rate of
OHC uptake and solar are in the same order of magnitude, with an inertial lag, the deeper oceans would continue warming slowly
while the upper layer flattens.
«The deep ocean has continued to warm,
while the upper 300 m
OHC appears to have stabilized.
The evidence from the
OHC is pretty good confirmation that it was positive, but even there, unless we know what the entire ocean is doing and not just the upper part, the surface could theoretically be gaining heat from the ocean
while losing heat to the atmosphere.
that's 8 years with the
OHC essentially flat
while CO2 has increased by approximately 16 ppm — what gives?
Given that
OHC has been declining these last seven years, this ought to give pause
while we answer the question:
The only two ocean basins with major increases in
OHC during the ARGO era are the South Atlantic and the Indian Oceans,
while the North Atlantic, Arctic, and South Pacific Oceans show significant declines in
OHC.
Right now, with the increasing forcing from GH gases, over multi-decadal periods,
while the ENSO cycle still exists, it is a «charge / discharge» cycle running on top of a longer - term rising
OHC.
Positive forcing at seasonal to inter-annual scales leads to an average global surface temperature drop from La Nina influence but recharging of
OHC (longer term gain),
while reduced forcing allows El Nino conditions and temporary peaks in global average temperature, and
OHC reduction (longer term loss).
While you are at it, where is your explanation for how regional SSTs can cause
OHC to rise in every major basin for four decades?
While some of the previously «missing energy» is accounted for, substantial discrepancies between
OHC and CERES at interannual time scales persist, and are especially prominent during 2008 - 9.