This study found that black carbon has a warming effect of approximately 0.9 W / m2,
while aerosol cooling effects account for approximately -2.3 W / m2.
Not exact matches
While it is still possible that other factors, such as heat storage in other oceans or an increase in
aerosols, have led to
cooling at the Earth's surface, this research is yet another piece of evidence that strongly points to the Pacific Ocean as the reason behind a slowdown in warming.
Now, researchers from the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) have identified an
aerosol for solar geoengineering that may be able to
cool the planet
while simultaneously repairing ozone damage.
One just included the effective influence on temperatures from manmade forces (including greenhouse gases and
aerosols, which tend to have a
cooling effect),
while the second included both manmade and natural ones (including volcanic activity and solar radiation).
Scientists are researching the use of an
aerosol to reflect sunlight back into space,
cooling the Earth
while simultaneously repairing the ozone layer.
For example, they predicted the expansion of the Hadley cells, the poleward movement of storm tracks, the rising of the tropopause, the rising of the effective radiating altitude, the circulation of
aerosols in the atmosphere, the modelling of the transmission of radiation through the atmosphere, the clear sky super greenhouse effect that results from increased water vapor in the tropics, the near constancy of relative humidity, and polar amplification, the
cooling of the stratosphere
while the troposphere warmed.
While it is true that, holding everything else equal, an increase in how much
cooling was associated with
aerosols would lead to an increase in the estimate of climate sensitivity, the error bars are too large for this to be much of a constraint.
The one slightly fortuitous aspect to this is that the forcing from CO2 alone is around 1.5 W / m2,
while if you add up all of the forcings, including warming factors (like CO2 and CH4) and
cooling factors (like
aerosols), you end up with a total around 1.6 W / m2 — i.e. all of the extra stuff we've put in over the years pretty much cancels out in the global mean.
While volcanic
aerosols cause surface
cooling due to decreased shortwave radiation at the surface, they also lead to increased indirect, scattered light at the surface.
From sheer thermal inertia of the oceans, but also because if you close down all coal power stations etc.,
aerosol pollution in the atmosphere, which has a sizeable
cooling effect, will go way down,
while CO2 stays high.
It might make sense to take a small portion of the
aerosol that would have been dumped into the troposphere by retired dirty coal plants, and inject that directly into the stratosphere where it will restore the lost
cooling effect
while (hopefully) doing less harm than the old stuff dumped into the lower atmosphere.
The contribution of greenhouse gases is greater than the observed warming,
while the total anthropogenic contribution is thought to be around 0.7 °C because of the
cooling effect of
aerosols.
While the
aerosol influence last less than a decade, the influence on surface temperatures continues because of the slow mixing of
cooled waters on the ocean surface.
But
aerosol cooling is more immediate,
while greenhouse gases accumulate slowly and take much longer to leave the atmosphere.
While SO2 emissions may have had some small role in that period, they can't have a role in the current standstill, as the increase of emissions in SE Asia is compensated by the decrease in emissions in the Western world, thus there is hardly any increase in cooling aerosols while CO2 levels are going up at record speed and temperatures are sta
While SO2 emissions may have had some small role in that period, they can't have a role in the current standstill, as the increase of emissions in SE Asia is compensated by the decrease in emissions in the Western world, thus there is hardly any increase in
cooling aerosols while CO2 levels are going up at record speed and temperatures are sta
while CO2 levels are going up at record speed and temperatures are stalled.
It's been a
while, but we have an update in our Today's Paradox series: If
aerosol climate
cooling is underestimated, that means the trend line of the global temperature graph would lie higher than the one you get by... Continue reading →
In the climate models, increases in greenhouse gases such as methane, and CFCs, are assumed to also cause some global warming,
while increases in
aerosols are assumed to cause global
cooling.
Mikel, Carl Sagan, in the aftermath of the first Gulf War but
while the Kuwaiti oil fields were still burning, famously predicted significant
cooling effects from the
aerosols of the fires.
Greenhouse gases — like carbon dioxide — trap heat and warm the planet,
while fine particles suspended in droplets, known collectively as
aerosols, usually
cool the planet by reflecting the sun's energy away.
Furthermore,
while soot on the snow / ice surface will enhance melt, soot and other
aerosols in the atmosphere have a
cooling effect that would slow melt.
While these particles soon fall back down to Earth and allow the planet to heat up again, the thinking with so - called solar geoengineering is that this thin layer of reflective sulfate
aerosols would be replenished to help keep it
cool.
In any case, this paper and theory therein significantly reduces the need to use
aerosol forcing
while explaining the the mid-century
cooling.
While the US, Europe and Russia were heavily affected from
cooling sulfate
aerosols between the 1950s - 80s, those very same regions have brightened thereafter (less pronounced in many parts of Eastern Europe).
While it is true that
aerosols can warm and
cool the climate (by absorption and reflection of solar radiation, respectively, besides influencing cloud properties), most evidence suggests that globally,
cooling is dominant.
Taking one example of these,
while the troposphere has been warming, the stratosphere has been
cooling, a feature of warming due to enhanced greenhouse effects, and also due to warming due to reduced reflectance from
aerosols.
Depending on their make - up, some
aerosols cause warming,
while others create a
cooling effect.