For political reasons rather than constitutional ones, the political question doctrine is likely to remain a troubling issue
while constitutional language will not.
Not exact matches
These Catholic claims prompted state
constitutional amendments nationwide dictating that public funds for education could not be controlled by «any religious sect,»
language carefully chosen to halt the Catholic drive
while preserving public school instruction in nonsectarian Protestantism.
By referring the case to the CJEU, the Italian
Constitutional Court gives the European Court a chance to revisit its jurisdiction
while avoiding the identity
language of the German
Constitutional Court — good news for cooperative constitutionalism in Europe.
a) Sounds to me like the same strategy as was used by the «Sovereignty - Association» crew at the
Constitutional level — asking for special exemptions AND $ $ compensation - for - services - provided - locally, expecting / demanding «special status» within the national organization to recognize inherent cultural /
language differences, legal uniqueness (rooted in BNA & pre-Confed special - arrangements) blah blah blah -
while attempting to hold the whole organization hostage / in doubt,
while angling for a better deal — settled in desperation / exasperation in order to make the problem «go away».