Not exact matches
While I try not to subscribe to «an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth» or to descend to the lower
debating tactics, I will admit that I failed on this occasion, just as the original poster did, not that that is an excuse for my behaviour.
While Clegg declined to comment personally, a Liberal Democrat spokesperson said: «This is yet another a distraction
tactic by a Labour politician attempting to shift the
debate from the real issue.
While the idea of verification of results is a good (if unexceptional) one, it should be remembered that part of the political
tactic of the anti-science politicians in Washington on other issues (see examples in Chris Mooney's book) has been to introduce as many conflicting studies from industry - funded thinktanks as possible, however faulty those studies are, to bury the
debate under noise.