Sentences with phrase «while evaporation»

But while evaporation will, for the most part, be evenly spread throughout the world, rainfall will vary dramatically.

In some areas precipitation increases, in others it decreases, while evaporation can be expected to increase due to rising temperature.]

Only about 40 % of the water reaches the crops, while evaporation in the hot sun takes more than two metres of water a year from the reservoirs - a total of around 300m cubic metres from Elephant Butte alone.

This observation may be explained by edge diffusion while evaporation - condensation is restricted, and it provides further support for the proposed overall relaxation mechanism.

Not exact matches

The increased sunlight reflectance in the sky would keep the waters below from warming up to the hurricane threshold while also curbing evaporation, thereby reducing the atmospheric moisture needed to make a storm.

While this change may be viewed as moral progress, it is probably due, in part, to the evaporation of the sense of sin, guilt, and retributive justice, all of which are essential to biblical religion and Catholic faith.

If human consciousness survives the evaporation of brain tissue then perhaps the «spirit» of St. Nicholas is alive and well and knows I care about who he was, and what he did while he was here.

Ingredients for broth: 1 uncooked whole turkey leg or large turkey thigh / 4 cups chicken or turkey broth plus a cup or two of cold water (you'll need extra water if you aren't using a pressure cooker due to evaporation while cooking / 1/2 large onion, peeled / 2 large carrots, quartered / 2 stalks of celery, cut in half / several sprigs of thyme / 1 bay leaf / 1 T black peppercorns / a couple of leeks, halved, if you have them.

Larger salt crystals form on the bottoms of the evaporation ponds, while finer sea salt crystals, known as fleur de sel, form on the surface and are scraped off quickly to preserve their fine texture.

While several of the IDC challengers would likely continue their campaigns, the evaporation of establishment support and the removal of their primary critique of their opponents would make their tasks much more difficult.

And while weather patterns can change from year to year, Lake Superior appears to be behaving in ways that, to scientists, indicate long - term climate change: Water temperatures are rising and evaporation is up, which leads to lower water levels in some seasons.

If you tried fanning the chocolate candies while they were under the lamp, the breeze should have helped to increase the rate of evaporation.

«During the evaporation of the water from the ocean, the water molecules formed by lighter isotopes will get preferentially evaporated, while during condensation the heavier isotopes will condense more effectively,» he says.

Urban land use creates a heat - island effect because asphalt, brick, and concrete absorb and conduct solar energy, while the cooling effect of evaporation from soil and vegetation is reduced.

The rice terraces are flooded from September to March, [and] the evaporation from these paddies provides a cool and pleasant climate for local residents while the fields provide a spectacular view for travelers.»

While an increase in the amount of radiation the Earth receives by trapping outgoing IR would increase surface temps, would the increased surface temp not increase the convection and evaporation rates introducing a negative feedback?

Is it the case that evaporation will increase primarily over land while precipitation will rise mostly over oceans?

Radiation biases are largely affected by cloud simulations, while EF bias is largely affected by soil moisture modulated by seasonal accumulated precipitation and evaporation.

In addition, less ice cover can lead to more evaporation and lower water levels while warmer water contributes to more algal blooms and impaired water quality, she says.

While climate change does not cause droughts, it can make them worse, as a warmer atmosphere leads to more evaporation from soils.

Therefore while an increase in evaporation may limit the increase in temperature (by your argument), it can not prevent there being an increase.

However, in theory, inhibited sweat evaporation would be less important in cold weather environments, so the negative impact of compression gear may be lessened, while the potential performance and recovery enhancements would remain.

While oil is a liquid and all liquids have an evaporation point, engine oils are designed such that the evaporation point is higher than any temps your engine will ever see.

They contain our best current understanding for how the physical processes interact (for instance, how evaporation depends on the wind and surface temperature, or how clouds depend on the humidity and vertical motion) while conserving basic quantities like energy, mass and momentum.

Anyway, a while back I saw a Nova / BBC special about the Global Dimming phenomenon (pan evaporation rate, etc.) that apparently had been discovered fairly recently, sometime in the late 90's I believe.

While it is true that infrared is absorbed in a thin skin at the top of the water, even if the water were completely quiescent this would still lead to the skin layer heating up until emission (plus evaporation and all the other terms we include in the surface budget) equalled the energy input.

While the energy input allows more evaporation to occur, it's confusing the matter to say that this «cools» the surface, since the evaporation is just helping to carry away the heat put in by the other terms.

In short sunlight warms the ocean while longwave emission from the atmosphere increases evaporation and does not warm the ocean.

Incorporating evaporation into the model shifts the distribution toward lower thresholds (Fig. 6, red), while at the same time increasing the precipitation threshold P c. Standard bootstrapping (see SI Appendix) reveals that the estimates in Fig. 6 are already relative robust distributions, in view of the simplicity of the model approach.

Evaporation is known to be on the order of 70 w / m2, while average downwelling longwave radiation is more than four times that amount... and some of the evaporation is surely coming from the heating from the visEvaporation is known to be on the order of 70 w / m2, while average downwelling longwave radiation is more than four times that amount... and some of the evaporation is surely coming from the heating from the visevaporation is surely coming from the heating from the visible light.

These crystals are then removed and dewatered while the water vapor from evaporation is condensed and returned to the process and reused throughout production.

While SRM is seen by many as the «safest» and cheapest of the geoengineering proposals to date, there are risks, including a decrease in precipitation and evaporation.

While this is certainly a true statement, it does not follow that we should increase the frequency and magnitude of water resource stress by increasing evaporation, drought frequency, water loss from plants, etc., as the USGCRP report notes will occur as human - induced climate change increases.

While I agree with your analysis you seem to miss the tall pole under the tent, namely the latent heat of evaporation of airborne water colloid (haze, clouds) to the visually transparent water vapor (WV).

While the years with warm and wet weather extremes have also become more common in the state, increased temperatures accompanying the precipitation tend to lead to quicker evaporation, Diffenbaugh said.

Lindzen (2011) reports that Wentz et al. (2007) used space - based observations to measure how evaporation changed with temperature compared with results from models and found that in GCMs, evaporation rose 1 - 3 % for each 1 K warming, while observed evaporation rose approximately three times faster, at 5.7 %.

Leigh Kelley asks how Professor Lindzen derives a climate sensitivity one - third of the IPCC's central estimate from the observation in Wentz et al. (2007) that the observed increase in evaporation from the Earth's surface per Kelvin of warming is almost 6 %, while the models incorrectly predict 1 - 3 %.

Canvas buckets allow significant evaporation while hauling in the bucket, cooling the water and leading to a measurement which is biased low.

Decreased snowpack has brought less water into reservoirs (such as Lake Oroville, pictured, in Northern California), while increased temperatures have led to greater evaporation of surface water.

Increased evaporation can dry out some regions while, at the same time, result in more rain falling in other areas due to the excess moisture in the atmosphere.

They predicted the response of the water cycle for the two cases and found that, in the former, evaporation increases by 2 percent per degree of warming while in the latter this number reaches 3 percent.

That is, the increase in water vapor due to enhanced evaporation from the warming oceans is confined to the near - surface area, while the stratosphere becomes drier.

There is still a cooler layer that cools more if evaporation increases but now we see that the temperature measured by sensors is above that layer, is not part of it and therefore records a misleading warmth while the sub skin cools unnoticed as I said:

Now, if one increases evaporation and / or upward radiation while keeping the left hand side (LHS) the same, then yes there is clearly an imbalance and the skin temperature will cool.

So while each individual evaporation event is endothermic, very few are spontaneous upon absorption of a photon and so most energy goes into warming the skin layer; it just so happens that the skin layer is still cooler because this is where all the energy for R comes from and it is also cooled by L; but increasing L beyond any increase in DLR is definitely still a violation of the second law!

At daytime the increase of the inflow of radiation energy into the liquid phase from outside intensifies the evaporation while at night time the reduction of the inflow of energy to the liquid phase reduces the energy amount that compensate the energy losses due to evaporation.

After a while if you notice the pond has filled do you know it was due to the hose solely, or did the streams feeding the pond change what they were adding, or did the rate of evaporation / loss change?

16) Instead they just said, in effect, «no obvious changes for a while so we can safely ignore solar influence» They also ignored the oceans, evaporation, condensation, clouds, precipitation and convection and other potentially substantial influences as admitted in this quote from the IPCC itself

While there may have been periods of time such as the exit from an ice age where the gain was greater than one, this has not lasted long enough for extreme effects such as the evaporation of the oceans as is believed to have happened on Venus.

To that you answer if the temperature ever starts to rise, due to say volcanic heat, or upwelling to water's surface, the heat is immediately removed by the power of evaporation as infrared - resonant gases chug heat straight up through the atmospheric mix to belch it out radiatively at higher altitude; while simultaneously dragging other, non-infrared resonant gases upward with them, to also dump THEIR heat radiatively, from a higher position than they would have, had the refrigerative cycle not taken place.