Not exact matches
The faithful Mormons are offended because they think Christians are calling them
evil people, although many of us are not,
while those of us who went to seminary and suffered through a course on systematic theology keep stressing that there is actually a precise definition of «Christian» and that Mormons differ from that definition in a very few important ways.
That was a very interesting read many comments caught my attention I've recently been diagnosed with Bipolar I have hallucinations and hear voices in my ear's when I hallucinate it's likes they are trying to get me thousands of them I can only describe them as dark shadows and they are trying to get me just as they are about to get me a brilliant white light surrounds me and there's three entities humanly shaped but like this brilliant white light they are also glowing this brilliant whiteness I can't understand what they are saying the only way I can explain it is emotions comfort joy love is what I feel emanating from these entities the voices I hear aren't
evil telling me to do bad things to
people when I get put into a mode of fear I live in a rough area of Scotland and everytime I've got into a fight something possesses me I know this for a fact as I can't control myself I'm an observer watching my family / Friends say I change they say my eyes change and I look
evil I personally do think possibly through my own personal experience I» am possessed as I act out of character I've lost interest in many things I've recently I decided it's time for change I've lost my faith I've been trying to connect with God and feel his love which I used to feel the presence of the holy spirit everytime I try connect I get a feeling of abandonment I just think if I am possessed could these entities stop me connecting with «God» I can say from my heart of hearts «JESUS CHRIST HAS COME IN THE FLESH» I think it's more to do with the
persons own personal fears which I have noticed my fears have changed if I had to be truthfully with myself I fear God which I know I'm not supposed to just I can't explain it I guess if you ever need a test subject I'm up for the challenge like I said I'm on journey to find myself and my travels have brought me hear I'm going to hang around for a wee
while there's lots of good information to be plundered loll
I suggest you read you Bible,
while there are
evil people doing
evil things, often at the behest of God, but more importantly, if you believe the Bible much of the
evil comes from God himself.
To me, a perfect judgement and sentence of the
evil person would require more than just a punishment in eternal flame, since he would still be capable of cursing God, fostering hatred and perversion and all sorts of other humanly sinful ways
while he was being eternally tormented.
These (most)
People just use it as a diversion to distract people away from how they truely are, and ya know what, it works really well on «fellow Christians;» they stick together like glue, like a heard of stupid sheep and baaaaaa baaaa each other, while they go around and treat honest and truthful «evil heathens» like dog crap on the bottom of their
People just use it as a diversion to distract
people away from how they truely are, and ya know what, it works really well on «fellow Christians;» they stick together like glue, like a heard of stupid sheep and baaaaaa baaaa each other, while they go around and treat honest and truthful «evil heathens» like dog crap on the bottom of their
people away from how they truely are, and ya know what, it works really well on «fellow Christians;» they stick together like glue, like a heard of stupid sheep and baaaaaa baaaa each other,
while they go around and treat honest and truthful «
evil heathens» like dog crap on the bottom of their shoe.
while the most ardent adherents to nihilism might embrace the full ramifications of such belief, most folks aren't willing to follow it to its logical end: compassion is just a «feeling» but it's not real /
people live & die / there is no such thing as good &
evil / etc..
If the
person you are talking about was observed to be chewing someone's face off
while levitating, then you would have something that looked to be the work of supernatural
evil powers.
Let us now say good - by for a
while to all this way of thinking, and turn towards those
persons who can not so swiftly throw off the burden of the consciousness of
evil, but are congenitally fated to suffer from its presence.
So disgusted with how God lets
evil go unchecked, and how God doesn't seem to protect you or your family or your plans, or how God seems to bless the wicked
people while not helping the righteous?
I believe in policies that reduce the urgent need some
people feel to kill abortionists
while, at the same time, respecting the rights of conscience of my fellow citizens who believe that the killing of abortionists is sometimes a tragic necessity — not a good, but a lesser
evil.
The sad thing about religion is
while there are some truly good
people in them there are some truly
evil people fostering hate and bigotry and the good
people mostly sit on their hands and do nothing.
• But a bad intention makes an act
evil that, in and of itself, can be good (CCC 1753): «This
people honours me only with lip service,
while their hearts are far from me» (Mk 7, 6 quoting Is 29, 13).
When you see something like this you will see that we obviously can not legislate this sort of morality, because
while we might need to (as a practical matter) try to limit the amount of
evil people do, we can not in good conscience try to force them into being heroes.
Democrats are generally considered
people who support the
evil of abortion,
while Republicans uphold the Christian understanding of the country's founding fathers.
«
Evil» seems like a word reserved for the worst of the worst —
while most
people consider themselves to be generally «good.»
as for
people who think you're
evil, a mate of mine who pastors a church in wolverhampton told me a
while back that if you're teaching effectively you're unlikely to be far from what many
people would call heresy.
This is NOT the same as Samson who died
while riding the world of a pure
evil people not the same as an American soldier dying in the name of freedom which is a biblical principal especially under the blood covenant.
I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most
people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox
while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in
people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a
person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S
PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear
people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when
people give into the LORD»S work that
evil minded or misinformed
people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without
people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.
And
while I appreciate the pastor's sentiments about God being found in the kindness and compassion of many
people after the shootings, he falls back on Man as an exceptional creation of God as an argument for why these
evil events happen.
Isn't it odd a loving and just God is described to pick a sick,
evil predator as being able to go to heaven,
while a good, decent and caring
person would not?
While the debates rage on about whether Noah is biblical enough, Heaven is For Real true enough, and God is Not Dead profitable enough, Philomena delivers a quiet, understated, and powerful portrayal of the actual human experience, where clear - cut lines between good and
evil, heroes and villains, right and wrong might be good «story-wise» but don't reflect the reality most
people of faith actually live in.
The man we are meant to boo has done almost nothing
evil,
while the
people we are supposed to cheer for have been consistently petty and behaving like hatin» - ass haters.
Because of these practical reasons, the moral reasons were manufactured and now even the thought of purposefully killing an enemy with concentrated bug spray is seen as
evil while killing that same
person by stabbing him in the throat with a bayonet is perfectly fine.
While everyone loves a story about good
people triumphing over
evil forces, such stories don't encourage us to become a part of the narrative.
Burnham responded to the Manchester Arena bombing on 23 May 2017, calling it an «
evil act»,
while praising the «best immediate response» of local
people, and thanking the emergency services.
Forty - one per cent of young
people told pollsters «religion is more often the cause of
evil in the world»
while only 14 % said it was a cause for good.
In a statement issued on Tuesday, by the Governor's Special Assistant on Public Communications and New Media, Lere Olayinka, he described Lai Mohammed as «an embodiment of contradictions, who speaks from several sides of his mouth, turning himself to a vegetable
while struggling to defend a government that has done more
evil than good to Nigeria and its
people.»
We are free, but not to be
evil, not to be indifferent to human suffering, not to profit from the
people, from the work created and sustained through their spirit of political association,
while refusing to contribute to the political state that we profit from.
People wanted to see pure good versus pure
evil, pitched in outright, massive battle, but only for a little
while.
This is just me making up connections where none exist, of course, but I still like to think that if there were some crazy intertextuality going on, the sinister - sounding voice that intones here about totally - not - at - all -
evil reasons for testing dangerous rollercoasters on live human subjects will one day, after the robot apocalypse, be putting
people through much more rigourous testing, perhaps
while wearing orange jumpsuits.
The film is good to excellent in every way except morally, and there it's questionable more often than it should be, not because it's an
evil film, or because the filmmaker or actors are bad
people, but because the interplay of means and ends has been under - thought or misjudged, to the point where the film becomes a catalog of obscenities: a horror thrill - ride drawn from life, a thing for viewers to test themselves against
while feeling just awful about Agu and his country, whatever its name is.
While being so different in regards to the first -
person view and abandoning of typical RE lore — Umbrella Corp., the t - Virus, zombies, etc. — what Resident
Evil VII does so right is that it goes back to the gameplay roots of the franchise.
While the original Captain America: The First Avenger was full of the kind of good vs.
evil, black and white heroics that
people commonly associate with the era.
We always want to give even the foulest of characters the benefit of the doubt because they might turn out to be interesting, but,
while there's nothing actually
evil about these
people, that feeling of openness to whatever these characters might offer disappears pretty quickly.
While it is imperative that we address collective bargaining and its attendant
evils, we must not lose sight of the fact that a teachers» union is pushing a sordid agenda and is involved with
people whose values many Americans find repulsive and abhorrent.
Self - taught and much enthused about all things personal finance, this average Canadian mom is on a mission to help
people use their money for good instead of
evil; teaching
people to keep consumer debt at bay
while investing to grow wealth.
«Hey, hun,
while you are embarking on a obvious suicide mission to redeem and bring back our son, could you and your team blow up another
evil planet - sized space station that can kill trillions of
people at once?
Lost in Nightmares, the new DLC chapter for Resident
Evil 5 has been available to everyone for a
while now, and some
people will have already eaten up the many hours worth of content.
Now, that doesn't mean I hope for every Resident
Evil from here on out to be in first -
person, but they'd reached the point where it almost seemed like they didn't know what to do with this series anymore, so it was best to do something different
while still trying to keep in mind what made
people like this series to begin with.
Beyond Good &
Evil, or BG&E, is a 3rd
person action adventure game and is a melting pot of different gameplay styles, a jack of all master of none if you will, offering combat, platforming, puzzles and stealth through its adventure
while providing a charming world and characters to interact with.
Sure, the affordable (and might we add, great tech) goes a long way where VR is concerned but Resident
Evil 7 sure did help in a large margin, helping
people shit themselves
while being chased by deranged red - necks.
While the Resident
Evil series has been progressively empowering its players, its first -
person shooter brethren, Doom, has done the opposite.
I understand why
people would be hesitant about two Coles, but they do play very differently («
evil Cole» is one of my personal best characters,
while I'm worthless with «good Cole»).
It spawned purely out of curiosity and interest from random
people while I would play Resident
Evil 5.
Of course
people would take his side, he's got a face
while Nintendo is just some
evil heartless company that churns out childrens toys that adults play.
The
Evil Within 2 is a bold sequel refining what
people loved about the original game
while introducing a mini open - world, side quests and a host of new villains and, for the most part, it's a very successful endeavor!
While Batman and the Joker are off dueling for the fate of the city, the ordinary
people have formed into gangs of impostors and taken to the streets to fight their own battles of good vs.
evil.
The combination of third
person and first
person perspective gel really well, and
while the story is generic Capcom pap, it is classic Resident
Evil pap.
While it isn't at all unusual for directors to work with the same
people for multiple projects - Tim Burton and Johnny Depp made careers out of it, after all - it does certainly feel like Constantin are attempting to directly replicate their Resident
Evil success with Monster Hunter.
While the last couple of instalments groaned beneath a mass of characters and shoddy action mechanics, RE7 strips things back to the roots of Resident
Evil 1, presenting the user with a scary mansion and scarier inhabitants — now from a first -
person perspective.