Not exact matches
As of March 2013, surface
waters of the tropical north Atlantic
Ocean remained warmer than average,
while Pacific
Ocean temperatures declined from a peak in late fall.
Take advantage of the spacious deck and backyard, featuring a private salt
water pool (heating available - fees / restrictions apply - must call office in advance for details and to confirm - does not heat if
temperatures drop below 55 degrees) and enjoy the gorgeous
ocean views
while you grill on the custom built - in propane BBQ.
The standard assumption has been that,
while heat is transferred rapidly into a relatively thin, well - mixed surface layer of the
ocean (averaging about 70 m in depth), the transfer into the deeper
waters is so slow that the atmospheric
temperature reaches effective equilibrium with the mixed layer in a decade or so.
It stands to reason that the
oceans haven't been that warm in a
while but since the average
temperature of the whole mass of
water is so dependent on circulation (it's only the surface
temperature that's constrained by its interactions with the atmosphere and space), I suppose a plausible history of that particular value would be very hard to reconstruct.
While the aerosol influence last less than a decade, the influence on surface
temperatures continues because of the slow mixing of cooled
waters on the
ocean surface.
Halifax -
While Nova Scotia, Canada was digging out from a spring snowstorm this week, about 200 kilometers (124 miles) off the coast, scientists were recording record - high
ocean temperatures in deep
water that reached 14 degrees Celsius (57 degrees Fahrenheit).
While there are some similarities between the approaches, an important difference is that the slab -
ocean approach allows surface and MBL
temperatures to adjust to the energetic perturbation: positive energetic forcing of the surface leads to warming, weakens the inversion, and reduces low - cloud cover and liquid
water path (LWP).
In the mid-18th century, some researchers began recording measurements of the
water temperature at the
ocean's surface
while on scientific oceanic voyages.
Scientists also know that
ocean temperatures are rising because warm -
water species are moving into areas that were formerly too cold,
while cool -
water and cold -
water species are likewise on the move.
Pritchard noted that the Antarctic Peninsula's annual average air
temperature has risen 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit (3 degrees Celsius) since 1950,
while near - surface
ocean waters have warmed 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit (1 degree Celsius).
``... the
water vapor is in equilibrium with the
ocean temperature that has risen less than the global
temperature, so its response relative to the global
temperature may be less than 7 % per degree,
while it is 7 % per degree for the
ocean.»
Ragnaar, the
water vapor is in equilibrium with the
ocean temperature that has risen less than the global
temperature, so its response relative to the global
temperature may be less than 7 % per degree,
while it is 7 % per degree for the
ocean.
To point out just a couple of things: —
oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because
water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that
oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the
water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside
oceans, so no latent heat) or
oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land
temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up
while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in
temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have
waters warming slower than lands, and because lands»
temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better
waters»
temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities
temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).
A slight change of
ocean temperature (after a delay caused by the high specific heat of
water, the annual mixing of thermocline
waters with deeper
waters in storms) ensures that rising CO2 reduces infrared absorbing H2O vapour
while slightly increasing cloud cover (thus Earth's albedo), as evidenced by the fact that the NOAA data from 1948 - 2008 shows a fall in global humidity (not the positive feedback rise presumed by NASA's models!)
While deep
ocean waters hold it, it's plateaued surface
ocean temperatures for a time.
«The top of the glacier is melting away as a result of decades of steadily increasing air
temperatures,
while its underside is compromised by currents carrying warmer
ocean water, and the glacier is now breaking away into bits and pieces and retreating into deeper ground.»
With regards to the evaporation, surely
while it does lower the
temperature of the
water it can not raise the
temperature of the air above that of the
ocean.
So, if you have a large enough influx of cold
water from the deep
ocean, it can cause the global
temperature to decrease temporarily, even
while the greenhouse component is acting to push the global
temperature to be warmer.
Re 99 should be:... Thus, global atmospheric
temperatures were higher in the early Eocene (55 - 50 mya) than in the late Cretaceous (70 - 80 mya)
while the deep
ocean waters were cooler in early Eocene than in late Cretaceous.
Our climate model exposes amplifying feedbacks in the Southern
Ocean that slow Antarctic bottom water formation and increase ocean temperature near ice shelf grounding lines, while cooling the surface ocean and increasing sea ice cover and water column stabi
Ocean that slow Antarctic bottom
water formation and increase
ocean temperature near ice shelf grounding lines, while cooling the surface ocean and increasing sea ice cover and water column stabi
ocean temperature near ice shelf grounding lines,
while cooling the surface
ocean and increasing sea ice cover and water column stabi
ocean and increasing sea ice cover and
water column stability.