The firm's gross revenue increased 0.6 percent to $ 1.06 billion last year,
while revenue per lawyer grew about 0.7 percent to nearly $ 603,000.
Profit per equity partner (PEP) also increased by 8.5 % to $ 2.36 m (# 1.53 m),
while revenue per lawyer (RPL) grew 8 % to $ 1.145 m (# 742,000).
Profits per partner at Cadwalader rose to $ 2.4 m (# 1.5 m) for 2009,
while revenue per lawyer climbed by 3 % to almost $ 1m (# 614,000).
Mayer Brown saw modest growth in 2015, with gross revenue increasing 2.8 % to $ 1.257 billion (# 889m),
while revenue per lawyer inched up 1.2 % to $ 835,000 (# 590,000).
Gross revenues grew less than 2 % to about $ 860m (# 610.7 m),
while revenue per lawyer stayed level at $ 1.03 m (# 731,000), and profits per partner declined 3.7 % to $ 1.834 m (# 1.32 m).
Profits per equity partner (PEP) rose 7.1 % to $ 4.38 m (# 3.53 m),
while revenue per lawyer rose 13.4 % to $ 1.27 m (# 1.02 m).
Not exact matches
DLA's gross
revenue rose 2.5 % in the last fiscal year, to a new high of $ 2.54 bn,
while average
revenue per lawyer inched up 0.7 %, to $ 675,000.
After a down year in 2010, Shearman & Sterling saw profits
per partner hold steady at roughly $ 1.56 million in 2011,
while its gross
revenue inched up less than 2 percent to $ 750 million and its
revenue per lawyer ticked down less than 3 percent to $ 900,000, according to The American
Lawyer's reporting.
But
revenue per lawyer dropped by 1.64 percent, from $ 1,034,287 to $ 1,017,372,
while profits
per equity partner rose by 1.8 percent, from $ 2,273,802 to $ 2,314,723.
According to the most recent Am Law 100 financial data, 570 -
lawyer Dorsey saw gross
revenue fall nearly 6 percent last year to $ 322.5 million,
while profits
per partner increased 13 percent to $ 565,000.
While developing strategies to cope with the recession, managing partners and executive committees must deal with is to understand their partners» expectations so that the former may develop and begin to implement strategies to reduce costs and enhance the volume of profitable business which, in turn, leads to increased
revenue per lawyer and profits
per partner.
Davis Polk's gross
revenue increased 2.8 percent in 2010 to $ 870 million,
while profits
per partner at the 745 -
lawyer firm rose 5 percent to $ 2.2 million.
While developing strategies to cope with the lagging demand for legal services,
lawyer management must understand their partners» expectations so that the former may develop and begin to implement strategies to reduce costs and enhance the volume of profitable business which, in turn, leads to increased
revenue per lawyer and profits
per partner.
As a result of the shrinkage, the firm's
revenue -
per -
lawyer jumped 15 percent, to $ 1.2 million,
while profits
per equity partner increased 11 percent, to $ 1.35 million.
While O'Melveny's gross
revenue essentially remained flat by declining less than 1 percent to $ 779 million, profits
per partner jumped 13.1 percent to $ 1.73 million, and
revenue per lawyer rose 10.2 percent to $ 1.02 million — the first time the firm has broken the $ 1 million mark in
revenue per lawyer.
While developing strategies to cope with the recession, managing partners and executive committees must understand their partners» expectations so that the former may develop and begin to implement strategies to reduce costs and enhance the volume of profitable business which, in turn, leads to increased
revenue per lawyer and profits
per partner.
In a clean sweep of rising financials, DLA's U.S.
revenue per lawyer (RPL) was up 8 percent to $ 879,000,
while its profit margin climbed 3 percent to a three - year high of 29 percent.