Investment returns are expressed in annual terms,
while yield on cost is a completely different measurement that doesn't consider how long an investment has been held.
Not exact matches
Knowing that market predictability is all a guess, all I can really do is diversify my investments among companies that sport safe and reliable
yields all the
while simply holding and averaging down my
cost should prices fall dramatically and make monthly buys no matter what's going
on in the world or market.
While you can find plenty of stocks with higher
yields, General Dynamics» double - digit dividend growth rate implies that over time, investors could collect a much higher
yield on cost.
Since we launched Cabot Dividend Investor in 2014, our top recommendations have delivered 50 % total returns with a
yield on cost of 3.7 %
while our top income recommendations have delivered
yields as high as 6.7 %.
While Vanguard's ETFs are famous for their low fees (the three in question
cost between 0.11 % and 0.13 % annually), the
yield data is presented
on a before - fee basis.
That is,
while VIG
yields a mere 2 % at current prices, as the fund's constituents hike their payouts over time, holders of this ETF will enjoy a better
yield based
on their original buy - in
cost.
While focusing
on low -
cost capital structure will help improve results in the upcoming quarters, Schwab's financials will continue to be hampered by lower trading activities, weaker equity markets and reduced interest rate
yields.
For one, a focus
on companies that reliably improve their payouts should lead to higher
yields on initial
cost over time —
while VIG might pay out 1.8 % today, in theory, it should pay more
on an annual basis every year the fund is held.
This has been accompanied by a rock steady cash
cost of $ 3.67 per carat,
on average,
while the
yield has stabilized in the 50 - 60 carats per tonne range for the past few years.
• Set up events
while ensuring that timely and appropriate input is provided during the setting up procedure • Monitored and calculated returns
on investments and implement improvements to increase impact • Recruited and trained personnel to handle event logistics, focusing
on marketing through social media platforms • Marketed and publicized events to attract target audiences, in a bid to
yield better profits • Negotiated
costs and prices of catering, facilities and transportation
i. Because certain closing
costs, individually, are subject to the limitations
on increases in closing
costs under § 1026.19 (e)(3)(i)(e.g., fees paid to the creditor, transfer taxes, fees paid to an affiliate of the creditor),
while other closing
costs are collectively subject to the limitations
on increases in closing
costs under § 1026.19 (e)(3)(ii)(e.g., recording fees, fees paid to an unaffiliated third party identified by the creditor if the creditor permitted the consumer to shop for the service provider), § 1026.38 (e)(2)(iii)(A) requires the creditor or closing agent to calculate subtotals for each type of excess amount, and then add such subtotals together to
yield the dollar amount to be disclosed in the table.
Proposed comment 38 (i)(1)(iii)(A)-1 would have contained examples of how to calculate such excess amounts and would have clarified that because certain closing
costs, individually, are subject to the limitations
on increases in closing
costs under proposed § 1026.19 (e)(3)(i)(e.g., origination fees, transfer taxes, charges paid by the consumer to an affiliate of the creditor),
while other closing
costs are collectively subject to the limitations
on increases in closing
costs under proposed § 1026.19 (e)(3)(ii)(e.g., recordation fees, fees paid to an unaffiliated third party if the creditor permitted the consumer to shop for the service provider), the creditor or closing agent calculates subtotals for each type of excess amount, and then adds such subtotals together to
yield the dollar amount to be disclosed in the table.
i. Because certain closing
costs, individually, are subject to the limitations
on increases in closing
costs under § 1026.19 (e)(3)(i)(e.g., fees paid to the creditor, transfer taxes, fees paid to an affiliate of the creditor),
while other closing
costs are collectively subject to the limitations
on increases in closing
costs under § 1026.19 (e)(3)(ii)(e.g., recording fees, fees paid to an unaffiliated third party identified by the creditor if the creditor permitted the consumer to shop for the service provider), § 1026.38 (i)(1)(iii)(A) requires the creditor or closing agent to calculate subtotals for each type of excess amount, and then add such subtotals together to
yield the dollar amount to be disclosed in the table.