She has particular expertise in defending high value and complex discrimination and
whistleblowing claims as well as extensive experience in advising clients in the financial services sector, including those affected by the senior managers regime.
Not exact matches
According to Judith P. Swazey and Stephen R. Scher, «The whistle - blower may be — and within his group usually is — perceived and treated
as a Judas Iscariot who has committed a disloyal, indeed treasonable act» (
Whistleblowing in Biomedical Research [1982], p. 179) The problem is frequently compounded by a sort of double - agent masquerade: some nay sayers, looking for credentials,
claim to be whistleblowers.
In addition to training teachers, administrators, and other school leaders on issues such
as tenure, special education, employment discrimination, employee
whistleblowing claims, student harassment and anti-bullying law, ethics, governance, and student rights, Teresa has argued before the New Jersey Supreme Court, has substantial experience in federal and state courts, and has tried numerous disputes to conclusion in the New Jersey Office of Administrative Law.
David is generally instructed in high profile and heavyweight cases in the High Court, frequently involving conspiracy and economic torts, unlawful competition, team moves, the protection of confidential information, post-termination restraints, wrongful termination / expulsion, carried interest and bonus disputes (where he has acted in most of the landmark decisions such
as Horkulak v Cantor Fitzgerald, Keen v Commerzbank and Anar v Dresdner Kleinwort),
as well
as claims arising in a regulatory context which raise important reputational issues, and
whistleblowing and discrimination
claims in the Employment Tribunal.
He declined, and brought a
claim for «compensation for detriment suffered by a worker
as a result of the making of protected disclosures», under the «
whistleblowing» legislation.
These discussions, providing they meet the required criteria, can not be used
as evidence in unfair dismissal proceedings, [60] although, unless the without prejudice rule can genuinely apply, they could be used in
whistleblowing or discrimination
claims.
Claims are divided into type A and type B; broadly speaking, type A claims (for example, statutory redundancy payments, unlawful deductions from wages and breach of contract) are those which the Lord Chancellor regards as typically the more straightforward and accordingly the fees related to such claims are lower than those for type B claims (which include discrimination, unfair dismissal and whistleblowing cl
Claims are divided into type A and type B; broadly speaking, type A
claims (for example, statutory redundancy payments, unlawful deductions from wages and breach of contract) are those which the Lord Chancellor regards as typically the more straightforward and accordingly the fees related to such claims are lower than those for type B claims (which include discrimination, unfair dismissal and whistleblowing cl
claims (for example, statutory redundancy payments, unlawful deductions from wages and breach of contract) are those which the Lord Chancellor regards
as typically the more straightforward and accordingly the fees related to such
claims are lower than those for type B claims (which include discrimination, unfair dismissal and whistleblowing cl
claims are lower than those for type B
claims (which include discrimination, unfair dismissal and whistleblowing cl
claims (which include discrimination, unfair dismissal and
whistleblowing claimsclaims).
However, employers still need to proceed with caution
as employees can bring discrimination
claims or a
whistleblowing claim in respect of their dismissal without any minimum service requirement.
In relation to
whistleblowing, the tribunal had found
as a fact that she had not been dismissed because of the grievances and so her
claim failed simply on grounds of causation.