These commenters were concerned about how disclosed protected health information would be used during and subsequent to
the whistleblowing event and felt that adding additional limitations to the ability to whistleblow would help to alleviate these concerns.
Some of these commenters were concerned that there was no protection against information later being leaked to the public or re-released after the initial
whistleblowing event, and that this could put covered entities in violation of the law.
Not exact matches
In the recent case of Bamieh v EULEX Kosovo and ors, the Employment Appeal Tribunal («EAT») found that an employee could bring
whistleblowing detriment claims against co-workers for
events which allegedly took place whilst on secondment in Kosovo.