Sentences with phrase «who accept evidence»

And some of the very people who accept this evidence, sparse evidence, low resolution evidence, are far more skeptical of evidence that is spatially denser and higher resolution than they are of sketchy evidence.

Yet, as Festinger would have predicted, instead of falling silent, perhaps even admitting error, the denialists have become more vehement in their attacks on climate scientists, environmentalists and anyone who accepts the evidence for global warming.

Not exact matches

Anyone who is serious about being fair needs to look at the whole picture without cherry - picking evidence or pretending that generally accepted principles don't apply to some.

I want everyone who acts as if this type of thinking is inconsequential to consider this: To accept creationism requires a complete disregard for carefully and elegantly researched scientific evidence, and 40 + % of people in America do so.

It is we Christians who accept all actual evidence — it is you rationalists who refuse actual evidence being constrained to do so by your creed.

Because communicating through a burning bush is moronic, and it is, and because I don't accept this nonsense without evidence, I'm the one who is lacking wisdom.

You make the claim that there is a god, I say I don't accept your claim due to the lack of evidence provided... seems to me the one making the claim is the one who needs to provide the evidence.

Mockery is the only option for people who accept something with absolutely NO evidence.

There is no evidence outside of the buybull to support the christards god, so anyone intelligent enough to realize this is not so worried and understands it is the one who is gullible enough to accept that god that is the fool.

Its just far too easy to manipulate those who are willing to suspend critical thinking and accept something without evidence.

«easy to manipulate those who are willing to suspend critical thinking and accept something without evidence» = > A very small percentage of Christians follow Christ.

We could throw the Bible out the window and still have plenty of solid, universally accepted, historical evidence of people who were willing to die for the cause they were teaching.

People who accept things on faith, without evidence, won't be swayed by evidence.

Simpletons acting on faith as opposed to the erudite who rely on logic is as much as saying simpletons don't want to know why anything is the way it is, they just accept what they have been told without a shred of evidence.

That's no evidence that Christianity is true, but the religion certainly did start as a cult of personality that followed a charismatic teacher who is generally accepted to be an historical personage.

If the dispute is about values, some of the evidence will include beliefs about good and evil that are not going to be accepted by those who have fundamental disagreements with your values in the first place.

NOT sorry to disapoint you but MY religion or spirituality is NONE of your business and suits me just fine, makes me a better person, more accepting of others, more kind to my fellow earthbound souls, more respectful to mankind and morther earth than all religions combined who unfortunately have over 2ooo years of evidence of horrors committed against each other ALL in the name of the religous organizations you want me to join??? I think I will stick with my smorgasborg of this and that spirituality.

Given current lack of evidence for proof of anything supernatural, will there be leniency for those who simply and honestly claim, «I don't know», granted there is a supernatural, and that the Christian God is the true God who did present us with an ultimatum to accept him or not, expecting us to wage the eternal fate of our soul?

No need to take my word, warning comes before destruction and it Jesus Christ who shall give you the very evidence that you refused to accept while being alive and by then, it will be too late for the unbeliever and the religious people who has taught false doctrines.

In light of such claims, it is perhaps not surprising to encounter these study questions on the scrolls: «Describe the impact of this discovery on those who do not accept the authenticity of the Bible» and «Determine the evidence from the Dead Sea scrolls confirming the claims of Jesus as the Bible describes him.»

I say this without sounding to mean (and I'm tryping this in a light manner so don't take it this way) but I could accept spider - man into my heart too and believe he is out there with the same amount of evidence that people who follow god do.

The beliefs are just so far out there for me, that whenever I see someone in ardent support of them I have to think they're a troll, because I don't know how they could possibly believe or accept that (there are a few exceptions of people who pt things very well, cite supporting evidence, and are consistent and coherent - I don't agree with them, but I can at least understand what they're saying)

No where did I see any evidence of «censorship» of those who didn't accept polywater like you seem to be claiming.

For those who accept science, the evidence of spiritual reality can be found all around us.

I could accept people who were messy as long as there was some evidence that they were looking to clean themselves up and look like «good Christians».

Saying «quantum» this and that, and using it as evidence for his hypothesis is only accepted by those who do n`t konw the science (including Chopra).

It is you who fail to accept this fact and conclusive evidence.

On the other side, there are millions of devout followers who wouldn't accept any evidence - no matter how concrete, that proves Jesus is not exactly what his followers have already decided he is.

We not only announce the promise of the Gospel, that God gives eternal life to anyone who believes in Jesus for it, but we also present whatever supporting evidence is needed to help people accept and believe that Gospel promise.

Is it appropriate to judge someone who ignores all of the accepted evidence and claims that the earth is flat?

He wants to use a scientist's «bottom - up» approach to New Testament evidence to vindicate Jesus not only to his colleagues, but also to any agnostic reader who accepts the authority of science.

Perhaps all present accepted the evidence, but some did not subscribe to the teaching of him who supplied that evidence.

thefinisher1 Are prosecutors, police and juries stubborn spoiled brats for accepting what DNA, fingerprint, video, and all kinds of other evidence indicate about who committed a crime rather than having the faith to just take the accused word that they didn't do it?

Tell him the book he keeps by his bed was written by an invisible deity who will punish him with fire for eternity if he fails to accept its every incredible claim about the universe, and he seems to require no evidence whatsoever.

Eusebius, the church historian, who wrote in the early part of the fourth century, furnishes evidence that some parts of the church accepted still other books, the Acts of Paul, the Teaching of the Apostles, or the Didache, and the Preaching of Peter.

It is surprising to me that it is often the activists who speak up in support of the scientific consensus around climate change (i.e. that there is overwhelming scientific evidence that climate change is induced by humans and is happening), who are the same activists who don't accept the scientific consensus and evidence that shows that GM crops can be safe.

Ken I accept that the players are responsible and there is no excuse for the debacle such as at Swansea last week.Of course Wenger didn't coach them to make these mistakes but when it is week in week out you have no option other than to look at the root of who where and why and it alls comes down on Wenger.These are all very good players who have all played and play international football for their respective countries, so the odd mistake is part and parcel but it is more than this and the evidence is there in black and white for all to see.

In their comprehensive report, «The Effects of Father Involvement: An Updated Research Summary of the Evidence,» researchers Sarah Allen, PhD, and Kerry Daly, PhD, define an involved father as one who is «sensitive, warm, close, friendly, supportive, intimate, nurturing, affectionate, encouraging, comforting, and accepting.»

Jacobs promised to prove charges of conspiracy and accepting bribes with videos, audio and emails, along with the testimony of a former assemblyman who collected evidence against Stevenson to try to earn a reduced sentence for his own plea to public corruption charges.

Senyo Hosi in his writ quoted Kennedy Agyapong of saying: ``... The man was promised one million dollars, he didn't take it... It is rather the one million dollars people who were going to do the contamination thing... I don't know that Hosi whoever Senyo [is] but I have all this evidence against them... If that guy is on it [the committee], if they bring any report, nobody will accept it because for someone who has gone to offer one million dollars... How can Boakye Agyarko the minister involve him... that guys should be thrown out completely... He should question the quy and let him face me.»

For six weeks, jurors had mostly been listening to evidence the government presented to prove its claim that Percoco, a longtime confidante and top aide to New York's Democratic governor, had accepted more than $ 300,000 in bribes from the businessmen who needed his help with state business.

Certainly, the list of historical martyrs who have utterly refused to accept rationalism, facts, logic, experimental verification and common sense evidence is long.

What is there is the evidence of a reasonably talented filmmaker having spectacularly overextended himself — Francis Ford Coppola who, having had a toney pop epic widely accepted as great cinema, felt he was ready to make Citizen Kurtz.

If we accept, as the evidence all around us indicates, that students need to be creative, critical thinkers and responsible citizens who can manage rapid technological and social change, then our curriculum design needs to reflect this and should continue to be updated.

Elementary teacher candidates who were licensed as a teacher in any state after July 1, 2006 are required to produce evidence of passing the accepted content knowledge test.

Elementary teacher candidates who were licensed as a teacher in any state after July 1, 2006, are required to produce evidence of passing an accepted content knowledge exam in the content area he / she will teach.

Anyone who is serious about being fair needs to look at the whole picture without cherry - picking evidence or pretending that generally accepted principles don't apply to some.

According to a Cats International article, â $ œMany apartment managers who previously required cats to be declawed are accepting Soft Paws vinyl nail caps or the evidence of a good scratching post.â $

I finally settled on the evidence and disgarded the scepticism on both Evolution (helped by accepting the Geological Age of the Earth) and Global Warming, and I recall that I decided it was the choice of language to lay out their case that helped confirm who to trust and who to ignore.

Two readers with different backgrounds who both accept that humans could disrupt the climate shared strong feelings of discouragement after the Obama administration's «evidence - based revival meeting,» as Cathy Zoi, the head of the Energy Department office on efficiency and renewable energy, described Wednesday's White House forum on energy and climate.