Sentences with phrase «who accept evolution»

There are also people who accept evolution, but have no idea how it works.

Many people — obviously we're living in a time where evolution is under fire and a lot of people, even people who accept evolution, don't necessarily see why it's so important that it's studied, but when you are talking about...

It is widely affirmed by traditional theists who accept evolution that God could have created the world in another way.

And I don't personally know a lot of Christians who accept evolution as fact.

Apparently he didn't say anything about believers who accept evolution.

If you believe that people who accept evolution, love homosexuals, and vote democrat can not be true Christians, you might be a legalist.

Lastly, the reference to devout Christians who accept evolution was in response to your comment about brainwashing with materialism and evolutionism, i.e.:

I think most non-Cathotic Christians who accept evolution think along those lines as well.

Many or all of these hypnosis / problems that you mentioned here and in other posts as objections to flood and / or evolutionism (such as Coconino Sandstone) are not new and are addressed in sites like creation.com Finally, because you mentioned Christians who accepted evolution, how about some atheists who oppose Darwin's evolutionism such as Nietzsche or, more recently, Jerry Fodor and Piattelli - Palmarini

So how can ANY atheist who accepts evolution claim to be more «moral»?!??!?!?!?!? The religion of atheism is seriously messed up beyond belief.

The first is a fundamentalism that says any Christian who accepts evolution to be true must be compromising their trust in Scripture.

Then we might have a real conversation and talk about what it means to be a Christian who accepts that evolution is true.»

Not exact matches

Christians who accept Darwinian evolution are, it is sometimes said, trying to have it both ways.

But even if we were to accept the proposition of «guided» evolution, we're left with the question of who designed the designer which only leads to arguments of special pleading... I.e. a dead end.

Real scientists who work in the field of immunology accept evolution as a fact.

The theory of evolution is also embraced by many who claim to accept the Bible as the word of God.

When the nation of Cyprus has a higher percentage of people who can accept evolution, you as a nation have a problem.

I also hear from a lot of evangelicals who have begun attending Mainline Protestant churches precisely because they welcome LGBT people, accept scientific findings regarding climate change and evolution, practice traditional worship, preach from the lectionary, affirm women in ministry, etc., but these new attendees never hear the leadership of the church explain why this is the case.

We concede that not all who doubt the existence of a personal God do so because they accept the theory of evolution, whether the word be restricted to biology or enlarged to its cosmic significance, but we do say, and from experience know, that most modern agnosticism is bound up with those non-theistic philosophies of evolution that stream off from Hegel as their modern fountain - head.

Now those who accept the evolutionary perspective are generally agreed that the universe is one single process and that there are stages in the process: the evolution of matter, next the emergence of the first unicellular organisms, then a process of further evolution of life toward vegetative and animal life, and from this latter phase emerged man.

If the early church could hold together communities made up of Jews and Greeks, slaves and free, men and women, circumcised and uncircumcised, tax collectors and zealots, prostitutes and Pharisees, kosher believers and non-kosher believers, those who ate food sacrificed to idols and those who refused, I guess this evolution - accepting, hell - questioning, liberal - leaning feminist can worship Jesus alongside a Tea Party complementarian who thinks the earth is 6,000 years old and that Ghandi and Anne Frank are in hell.

I mean, the Pope, who is a Christian, accepts evolution.

Evolution has not been «falsed» — it is supported and accept by all who understand it, and only denied by those who don't.

Because plenty of respectable people like Ron Paul, Mitt Romney, and Mike Huckabee (who are not scientists) don't accept evolution, and that somehow validates his opinion.

I personally do not accept evolution, but those Christians who do believe in evolution most often believe in something called «Theistic Evolution» which is where God was the originator of the evolutionaryevolution, but those Christians who do believe in evolution most often believe in something called «Theistic Evolution» which is where God was the originator of the evolutionaryevolution most often believe in something called «Theistic Evolution» which is where God was the originator of the evolutionaryEvolution» which is where God was the originator of the evolutionary process.

Evolution is accepted via many scientists - people who have devoted years to researching the subject and who have followed the scientific method to determine the facts.

Actually, Don the only people I've ever heard say that evolution requires «blind faith» to accept, are those who employ «blind faith» on a daily basis in order to accept religious dogma.

I know there are many scientists, Christian and non-Christian, who do not accept evolution as fact.

Biological evolution is not only universally accepted by all scientists in some form or other, but it is part of the common knowledge of nearly everybody who has had a secondary school education.

For those who believe accepting evolution and being Christian are mutually exclusive, please go to: http://biologos.org/

A timeline describes the declension from the biblicism of Martin Luther and John Calvin to the thought of Descartes, Francis Bacon, Galileo, Darwin and Charles Hodge (he may be an archconservative to most Presbyterians, but his acceptance of Darwinism lands him in the hall of shame here) to a certain Charles Templeton, who once traveled with Billy Graham but unfortunately accepted evolution and ended up writing the atheist tract Farewell to God.

Andrew Copson, BHA Director of Education, said, «There are very many non-religious people in Britain who understand and accept natural selection, and who may even agree that belief in God is unnecessary, but who would not necessarily subscribe to this idiosyncratic definition of «atheistic evolution».»

Rennie: Or for that matter, any number of theologians who are obviously devoted in their various faiths and also accept that evolution actually happened and that the mechanisms of natural selection and the further extensions of that, that modern biology has developed, all are there.

We will now get letters from various disgruntled listeners who contend that they are very well educated because they hold some degree from some renowned university and yet they still do not accept evolution.

Collective Evolution B12 Deficiency: A Serious Silent Epidemic That's Affecting Us All Collective Evolution There are two common criticisms that vegetarians and vegans are accustomed to hearing on a regular basis from those who either disagree or refuse to accept their dietary choice.

I finally settled on the evidence and disgarded the scepticism on both Evolution (helped by accepting the Geological Age of the Earth) and Global Warming, and I recall that I decided it was the choice of language to lay out their case that helped confirm who to trust and who to ignore.

Conservatives who deny Darwinian evolution - natural selection, or who accept Biblical creationism, or even deny the Apollo moon landings are denying basic, provable facts from the Past.

I hear from liberals who claim to believe in evolution but don't actually accept that a history of random variation and natural selection is of relevance in thinking about human behavior: as with Scopes, the only part of evolution they believe is that it contradicts the Bible.

Interestingly, a 2010 poll showed that only 10 % of Australians did not believe in evolution, suggesting that a significant portion of those Australians who accept a Biblical account of the origin of humans accept a somewhat more scientific account for the origin of other species - or that they are very confused.