Sentences with phrase «who agree on that point»

I've spoken to a lot of indies who agree on that point, but many of them seem to be worried about the practical risks of developing for a new platform.

Not exact matches

Chris Grady, a Stoneman Douglas High School senior who's enlisting in the military, asked Rubio a very pointed question on whether he'd agree that there was no place for large - capacity magazines.

While I agree with the many pro choice sentiments on this page I simy must point out that when it comes to our supposedly democratic system I must disagree with those of you who clamor for a 3rd party.

There are plenty of us who agree with his point of view on many issues.

The bible is So correct and clear that anyone who reads it can agree on the important points of how to worship god, right?

Thomas F. Madden replies: Mike Schorsch is certainly correct to point out that not all Christians who lived before A.D. 1000 agreed on an issue as complex as violence.

The doctrine produces outward Christian activity - an informal code on what is «Christian» life - style (the agreed points of which are nevertheless being whittled down with each passing year), Christian activity in and out of church, and a Christian empire with organs of entertainment, education, and political influence - but it does not necessarily produce Christians who are, at the roots of their being, Christian.

Arguements based on any religious text will not be persuasive to someone who is not of that faith and, as he pointed out, those who are of that faith will likely already agree with the arguement.

The various scholars who agree with Smend on this point are reviewed by Peter C. Craigie in The Problem of War in the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Win.

To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....

And yes, you're talking about a single event that happened thousands of years ago on a single day And I meant the later, when I ask question, they are generally honest questions, but back to the point, you agreed with me on every, because you assumed that at least part of the story was true, but who is the everyone you were referring to?

I find it interesting how the «false prophet» teaching is always used on anyone who doesn't agree with one's particular view point.

Those who agree GOD doesn't exist I want you all to march to your local churches and stand on your so - called truth by proving your points.

Oh... forgot you Proving... I wasn't referring to what he said... on the surface, it's fine to have a point of view... whether I agree with it or not... but when you are A) in a position of influence and B) spending money to fight the opposing view... and it's to stop two people who love each other from wedding in the eyes of their Lord, then it is hate... if your ignorance allows you to think my comments are stupid... so be it... and one last point about slavery... whether it was Democrats or Republicans who supported, or fought against slavery... many justified slavery because of their perverted interpretation of the bible... most people can't tell a simple story from one person to the next... but so many foolish Christians think they know exactly what the bible is saying w / o any doubt... forget the fact that it's been translated and passed for 1000s of years... yup you must be right that God is against two people loving each other... He must have made a mistake with those folks huh?

Posting links of religious people who you agree with on this issue does nothing to refute points I made.

However, as a point of discussion, I think people are recognized as persons of authority / leadership / spiritual gifting / etc. by particular groups and it seems that God has established not one authority, but multiple Christian authorities who agree on a lot and also disagree on a lot too.

One person who agrees that Campbell is a top talent, is former Gunner and current Sporting Lisbon coach Luis Boa Morte, who after the Arsenal Legends fixture on Saturday, was keen to point out his praises of Joel Campbell.

You don't get it do you?I'm not even talking about the money.But I agree with you that for the kind of money that will be spent on Mbappe it's a higher gamble.Henry was bought to be a starter and as the main man for Arsenal.He was so young by then and the pressure on him was massive.Looking at the impact he's had in our club if Henry had failed who would imagine what Arsene would have done.To me he's our best player ever.Arsene put a lot of trust in him to be honest but the gamble paid off.However, I think he had a point to prove to world and to Juve hence he succeeded.The same as is with Mbappe with even a higher transfer fee and more expectation.If he's ever signed for that amount he's coming here to be the main man whowill send us into glory.Forget Ozchez for all eyes will be on him.

I agree the posters who pointed out that skins organization is usually on the wrong side of desperate trades.

Try argue some actual points instead of hating on everyone who doesn't agree with you.

Brewer, an 11 - year NBA veteran, averaged 3.7 points in 54 games this season with the Lakers, who agreed to a buyout with him on Wednesday.

Who said I care if anyone agrees with me.If you think anything I've said is not true then kindly point it out instead of saying its nonsense.I'm not forcing you or anyone to accept what I'm saying.I'm also expressing my views on the topic.Do you think everything here you've said has made sense?

Minus some flashes from both Sead and Iwobi, and a workingman - like effort from Elneny, we learned very little... so here are a few of my observations from today's game, which highlight my concerns about this team moving forward... the fact that Mertz started this game, regardless of our injuries or those being «rested», should be a serious red flag for any true Arsenal fan... if Wenger is preparing to use Mertz with any regularity then the whole thing is a moot point because we are in deep shit... the fact is no quality team would ever have this tin soldier anywhere near there starting eleven except to groom their youthful players, who in turn should be playing in this type of game instead... I can only hope he was simply throwing him a bone for the FA appearance and for agreeing to stay on following the season, but I think the most likely answer is that Wenger's fragile relationship with the fan - base can't be ignored so he felt his experience was a safer bet... unfortunately not a positive choice for a team trying to move forward (same old, same old)

The same source told me the committee is just starting its fundraising efforts again, and will likely bring in — and spend — about the same as it did this year, but — and this point was stressed — the focus will be on bolstering Cuomo in a positive way, not attacking those who don't agree with him.

«Through mediation via trade union colleagues and the NEC and others, we need to agree on a point of time where there will be a stock - take of where we are up to,» said Burnham, who added that one suggestion made during last year's leadership race had been to hold an annual review.

One sticking point that has been removed: The governor apparently has agreed to give up on appointing the majority of commission members, which was an issue for goo - goos who have never thought it appropriate for the executive to control the entity that polices the executive branch.

Hammond, who says he battled TAMU for months to gain access to documents under a state open records law, agrees on one point with Davis: «I think that there are many other schools that have issues like Texas A&M.»

On average, this is only a 1 - point increase in the number of respondents who agreed compared with the previous survey, carried out in 2010.

Arno, I agree, these 2 points may be indicators of how interested is the woman, who is sending an EOI, but remember, Russian and Ukrainian girls don't have a habit of looking at men's profiles on a dating site for weeks before contacting them.

Ebert and I agree on a couple of points: I am also tired of illiterate directors who pepper their stupid opus with gratuitous gore and «hip» one - liners and references to other films.

The fact that even the kings of everyone's favorite Star Wars ship can't agree on the porgs reveals what a meme - able point of contention they've become... but also John Boyega and everyone who hates the porgs is wrong, don't @ me.

If we can agree upon that point ~ then possibly we can agree on the need for all teachers or at least those who come in contact with the gifted to complete some basic training in this area.

Mr. Tracey pointed to the signs on the walls showing the areas of the room for those who agreed or disagreed with the statement, or were undecided.

As the conference wound its way to the final panel, the ominously named «Print Vs. Digital - Â War, Co-Existence or Collaboration,» the final group of commentator who ranged from retail and library players to executives focused on sales and the digital space seemed to agree on one point.

The point I think I hear you making is that you and your publisher should be deciding these things, not Amazon, and on that we agree, but I don't think you can dismiss the theory that books are interchangeable at all — there's LOTS of good writers, and VERY few readers who only read the books of one writer.

You called anyone who doesn't agree with yiu on soms points «in denial» and «unsensible».

I agree with every one who has pointed out the small win that Microsoft had in October and have given their thoughts on it.

Agree with others who point to the path you're already on, which is now narrowing and becoming more clear and visible.

One wonders if Weber and Stritzler - Levine realised just how far off the map they would go when independent institutional curator José Roca, a native of Colombia who now lives in Bogotá, agreed to take on the project.1 Inspired by a show of Andean chuspas — bags made from coca leaves — that would run simultaneously in the BGC Focus Gallery, Roca envisioned immersive environments in which the paradoxes, polarities and points of contact between diverse artistic practices are explored through the tropes of the river and weaving.2 The works themselves provide their own context as they interact with each other and viewers, who are given a minimalist illustrated pamphlet as their only guide to what they will encounter in the gallery spaces.

The point being that arguments by analogy are not persuasive to anyone who doesn't already agree with you on the substance.

Brad Johnson, who writes the Wonk Room blog for the Center for American Progress Action Fund, challenged me to clarify my stance on things, pointing to a post by his colleague Joe Romm concluding that «human civilization is on the precipice» and asking if I agreed.

Among people who have graduated from college, Democrats and Democratic - leaning independents are 43 percentage points more likely than Americans who lean Republican to say scientists agree on global warming.

Just over half in the survey, 51 percent, say there is «a lot of disagreement among scientists» over the existence of global warming, down 11 points from 2009 but still higher than the share who say scientists agree with one another on the issue, 43 percent.

On the last point I would agree with Tim Osborne (from CRU) who had a hard time explaining to mann that manns reconstruction had smaller CIs that the temperature record!

To express uncertainty over humans» influence on the climate, Foran points out, is to be out of line with 97 percent of scientists — those forming the overwhelming consensus — who agree that the planet is warming and that humans are the primary cause.

On can argue about the appropriateness of a uniform (ignorant or naive) prior, and I tend to agree with those who argue against the use of an ignorant prior, but this is a debatable point.

When people who agree can't even agree on a definition of the extent and urgency of the problem, then what's the point of saying anything to anyone?

On these points he is pretty much in line with Anthony Watts, who also agrees that the globe has been warming over the last century.

But, if your client is effectively «deputized» or becomes a «de facto» agent of the state who is called up to be a member of a posse for the police, for example, by using an agreed symbol such as shining a light with a symbol on it on some clouds, at that point, with respect to that matter, the 4th Amendment exclusionary rule and Miranda probably do apply to evidence that your client obtains, and exclusion of that kind of evidence could make prosecution much more difficult, unless the prosecution can successfully make an argument that the other evidence that the illegally obtained evidence leads them to is not «fruit of the poisonous tree» because it would have inevitably been discovered in due course using only the legally obtained evidence.

On Keith's point that a court would hold responsible the person who controlled / programmed / made available the software for any damages arising from bad chatbot advice... I agree.