Sentences with phrase «who are interested in reading»

You should advertise your ebooks or other products so that people who are interested in reading more know where to go.

There is a growing number of people who are interested in reading books about online dating possibly because they are considering that online dating could be a better way of finding their partner in life.

The public library is a good place to find females who are interested in reading wide array of topics.

For those of you who are interested in reading the arch of a sad, sad bitter life, crusie through the remarks by «the son a Piper man» aka Tom Tom, Stands for nothing, hates everything, curses when left with nothing to say, then hysterically claims victory for hurting someone's feelings, and stands for nothing, but will gladly point out your poor syntax, grammar and spelling errors like a weary retired 3rd grade teacher.

So, she is sharing her ideas with anyone who is interested in reading her blog!

Blogging book reviews gets the blogger an audience who is interested in reading book reviews, not an audience for this work of fiction.

First, any «interested reader» who is interested in reading anything on the Internet should follow links, and any writer of anything substantive on the Internet should provide links to relevant supporting material.

Not exact matches

Even though it's probably a small audience, those who read the book will be very interested in it.

Interested consumers who have only read about the Oculus Rift but have never experienced it in person will be able to schedule a demo of the device at Best Buy stores.

I read books about the female brain, met with science and math elementary school teachers and nonprofit educators who were doing programs to get kids interested in STEM.

«This pattern or practice of discrimination denies job opportunities to individuals who are searching for and interested in jobs, reduces the number of older workers who apply for jobs with the offending employers and employment agencies, and depresses the number of older workers who are hired,» the complaint reads.

If you want to engage those customers who are not interested in sitting down and reading a blog post (especially when it's educational and not entertaining), videos are one way to reach this crowd.

Prospects who read your long copy and then request a white paper are really interested in what you're saying.

If you need help in this area, read 7 Signs of a Shareholder Friendly Management, which will give you some clues as to whether you're dealing with a good team of executives who have your best interests at heart.

Another thing to notice is that, if Vanguard owns over 10 percent of most of the big mall REITs — and it does — then an over-literal reading of the law would say, well, they are all interested stockholders in one another (since all of them have an associate who is a 10 percent holder of the other REITs), and therefore none of them can buy any of the others.

«We all have to read the result of the Greek elections as a message of hope that comes from an entire generation that is demanding more attention and interest in those who have suffered from the crisis,» Renzi said.

I have absolutely no interest in being responsible for anyone's investments who reads this website without doing their own homework.

Any investor who is interested in value investing — and at some point, every trader should be — should start by reading The Intelligent Investor and soaking up what it has to offer.

Also most Atheists read religious article because the topic is usually of great interest to some like my self, who loves theology in a cultural sense but can see the bad logic involved and doesn't believe any of it happened.

Noll concludes: «In the end, Protestants who are interested in higher education have a special reason to read Gleason's story with sympathIn the end, Protestants who are interested in higher education have a special reason to read Gleason's story with sympathin higher education have a special reason to read Gleason's story with sympathy.

If you are a non-US writer who has come up with a new religious doctrine and have insufficient funds to promote your writings, the only chance you have is if someone in the US happens to read about you, is interested in what you wrote and has the potential to mention your writing and / or your name in the US mainstream media.

The overall exchanges have been interesting to read to me, because with the clear exception of Julie — who was outright wronged and is due the apologies she seeks — it reads like a lot of typical in - house backbiting, now that things have come to light.

If I'm not interested in something, I don't even bother reading it, you should do the same and let those who have faith and belief to go about as they choose!

Those (or even the one: — RRB --RRB- who may be interested in the topic can read it throughout the web: «How Could Jesus Spend Three Days and Three Nights in the Tomb?»

So I mainly follow links on twitter now (and facebook to a lesser extent), following people who are good sources of the things I'm interested in, and trusting that the good quality articles will float to the top... When I want more things to read I turn to Google Reader, but normally end up just picking up on the few blogs I'm really interested in.

For pomoconites who are interested in the Constitution, and who have some time, I invite you to read (and comment on) an article I wrote for the CRB, which just appeared.

Neither the White House nor the Congress seems interested in, or capable of, articulating such a doctrine, and it is not likely to come from a forum of formers who are reading from scripts that in the present political culture are, if intelligible at all, thoroughly implausible.

Perhaps Mark is interested in suggesting to whatever Roman officials who might read his gospel that the Roman power was relatively guiltless in the affair.

For the minority who take an active interest in the Liturgy, read Catholic articles and follow news within the Church, I suspect that the people who are delighted by the new ICEL will far outnumber those who are opposed to it.

Many of you who read my blog are also interested in church planting, and so I want to introduce you to a friend of mine, Nathan Laughlin (and his wife Amy), who is heading to Vancouver, BC next year to plant a network of churches called «Open Circle.»

But I think that most who read this blog are genuinely interested in understanding how unbelievers (and former believers) view Christ and Christianity.

Those who are interested in the nuts - and - bolts of the faith - based movement should read Of Little Faith: The Politics of George W. Bush's Faith - Based Initiatives.

If you are at all interested in learning more about how and why people who love Jesus — why long time faithful disciples who have a high view of Scripture with a deeply Christian ethic around sexuality — are arriving at this conclusion, I would commend to you a season of bible study and theological reading and prayer in company with the Holy Spirit and the body of Christ.

Reading the recently translated memoirs of Dietrich von Hildebrand, «the Catholic Bonhoeffer» (of which more soon), I was interested to see how often he encountered Christian theologians who did not support him in his opposition against Hitler because they saw Nazism as the culmination of the historical process.

Men of this age seem to be very much interested in either digging up the remains of past civilizations, or reading of the work of those who have themselves done so.

I have known laymen to invite a friend who is or who may be interested; I have known other persons who just «turn up» because somehow an announcement has reached them or they have read about the school in the public press.

I had actually read an interesting article some months ago of an atheist soldier who was put in charge of guarding a moronic chaplain.

As to those who disbelieve or mock religion, I read something recently that I'd like to share — not out of a spirit of contention and argument, but in one of genuine concern and interest for those who have not been taught by their own mothers or fathers (as I have most thoroughly been blessed):

Novidades, a Portuguese weekly, is considering publication half in English because «there are many people who do not read Portuguese but who are interested.»

The interest in Asian religion so manifest in the 1960s can be traced back to his time at Columbia University in the 30s, where he discussed oriental scriptures with a Hindu monk, Mahabarata Bramachari, who also urged him to read Christian mystical literature, such as the Confessions and the Imitation of Christ.

My chances of reading it in peace have been scuppered by two small boys, who are intent on playing shops and not remotely interested in «mummy's new book».

I feel like I'm set for the summer now, since I trust pretty much anyone who reads you religiously to have fun and interesting ideas in the kitchen.

BUT from MANY others and family as well who suffer from gluten or are diagnosed Celiac it has become important enough to me to read up as much as I can, being interested in health.

That being said, I would love to read an irreverent one from someone like Anthony who, like me, has no interest in them.

Galatasaray have reportedly sent sporting director Bulent Tulun to England to check on Frei as well as run the rule over Reading midfielder, Jem Karacan, who they are also rumoured to be interested in.

This window is especially interesting given all the drama of the season so far, Martin O'Neill and Alan Curbishley get their hands on some real money for the first time in their managerial careers, Chelsea get to address apparent squad depth problems, Manchester United can try to sign someone who isn't super old, and we're guessing Harry Redknapp is going to pick up a couple more dodgy deals for Portsmouth, while Reading, Sheffield United and Watford will hopefully spring a surprise or two.

Mertz should never have been our captain in the first place... who has ever heard of a team that makes 11th hour transfer buys (Arteta & Mertz) then seemingly places those same individuals into prominent leadership positions from the get - go... indicative of the problems that have permeated our clubhouse for the better part of 7 years under the Kroenke & Wenger... what is wrong with the players chosen and / or the management style of Wenger that doesn't develop and / or encourage strong leadership from within... Mertz was the fine collecting lackey from year one... this is what happens when you don't get world - class players because many times they want to have a voice on and off the pitch and this can't happen when you play for a fragile manager who has developed a coddling wage structure where everyone is rewarded for simply wearing the shirt and participating in the process... not enough balance between performance and pay, combined with the obvious favoritism shown to some players regardless of their glaring lack of production... remember that Ramsey has played in positions that make no sense considering his skill - set (out wide) and has forced other players off the field or into equally unfamiliar positions with little or no justification (let's remember when you read articles about how Ramsey's goals this upcoming season being the potential X-factor for our success that this is the same individual who didn't score a goal until the final week last season)... this of course is just one example of many... before I hear another word from Mertz I want this club to address the fact that no former player of any real consequence has any important role in the management structure of this club, yet several former Gunners have expressed serious interest in just such an endeavor (Henry, Viera, Adams, Bergkamp... just to name a few legends)... there is only one answer: an extremely insecure manager!!!

Are you really naive enough to believe that Wenger would bring anyone into this current locker room that is going to be given a strong voice... have you not been watching, listening or reading about our club for years... Lehman is a blind Wenger follower, which is the only reason he was even considered... just for a second think of all the strong personalities that have played for this club that have never been seriously considered even though they have expressed legitimate interest in participating in the coaching process... even worse, think of all the former greats who aren't even allowed on the same pitch as Wenger because they have offered their advice and / or criticism to the infallible one... I dare you to find a manager that has distanced himself from his former players as much as this man... it's the very reason why only one player I can think of has ever returned to play for Wenger and that was Flamini, which was hilarious considering we were desperately looking for a top quality defensive midfielder but Wenger could somehow find no one better than Flamini in the whole wide world... let's face it this club was simply trying to appease it's disgruntled fans by declaring that Wenger would no longer be given Ca rte Blanche when it came to the backroom staff so they probably asked him to give them a list of those who he would allow in the locker room... on that list he wrote Lehman, Pires and Bergkamp, likely because the first two are the only former players who haven't publicly questioned his horrible decision - making and the last one because he won't get in an airplAre you really naive enough to believe that Wenger would bring anyone into this current locker room that is going to be given a strong voice... have you not been watching, listening or reading about our club for years... Lehman is a blind Wenger follower, which is the only reason he was even considered... just for a second think of all the strong personalities that have played for this club that have never been seriously considered even though they have expressed legitimate interest in participating in the coaching process... even worse, think of all the former greats who aren't even allowed on the same pitch as Wenger because they have offered their advice and / or criticism to the infallible one... I dare you to find a manager that has distanced himself from his former players as much as this man... it's the very reason why only one player I can think of has ever returned to play for Wenger and that was Flamini, which was hilarious considering we were desperately looking for a top quality defensive midfielder but Wenger could somehow find no one better than Flamini in the whole wide world... let's face it this club was simply trying to appease it's disgruntled fans by declaring that Wenger would no longer be given Ca rte Blanche when it came to the backroom staff so they probably asked him to give them a list of those who he would allow in the locker room... on that list he wrote Lehman, Pires and Bergkamp, likely because the first two are the only former players who haven't publicly questioned his horrible decision - making and the last one because he won't get in an airplare the only former players who haven't publicly questioned his horrible decision - making and the last one because he won't get in an airplane

In the case of Chavski, we have an owner who was willing to do what you suggested, Silent Stan blocked Usmanov though I believe I read that Usmanov offered us a 0 % interest loan over a silly length of time (100 years I think) and that meant we would be making repayments of a fraction of what we did make allowing more funds for wages and signing of top quality players.

I will say I do not know who Mustafi was wanted by, I didn't read Wenger wanting him and wooing him like he did with Alexis and Xhaka, how Ozil said talks with Wenger convinced him AFC was the team after RM... Funny how 2 of that 4 was signed at least 12 months after Wenger had shown interest in them while Sven shown interest in Auba and AFC got him in the same window for a record fee, tried penny pinching still but hey....