Sentences with phrase «who argue for»

[136] To be expected, there were a range of views on what this should actually look like, ranging from those who argue for a funding body similar to the Canadian Aboriginal Healing Fund (AHF), to those who suggest a body with more of a research, education and advisory function.

Apple's Mac line isn't going anywhere, and people who argue for either Macs or iPads are missing the point.

Ultimately, strict adherence to an effects — based approach can and should undermine the brave — new — world rhetoric of those who argue for the expansion of the definition of «war» as a result of their focus on cyber instruments rather than the effects of their use.

Those who argue for change point out that deductions from damages to pay the costs are already a feature of certain types of PI claims, so why should extending this approach be a problem?

Those who argue for them are relying on innuendo and belief.

Information about how many cyclists are around can be a powerful tool for those who argue for more bike paths and more cyclist - friendly streets, and it can probably also nudge motorists to give biking a go («wow, 12,000 people rode bikes on that street today, maybe I should join them...»).

Hence those who argue for reducing taxes almost always simply avoid any discussion of the re-distributive implications.

Arguing to «do nothing» would exclude those who argue for that approach from the game.

How do those who argue for «values» as a primary input to policy analysis justify the cost of values judgements that cause government to waste huge amounts of public money funding irrational policies — such as carbon pricing and incentives for renewable energy?

I have some questions for those who argue for mitigation, and especially for CO2 pricing as the means to mitigate sea level rises:

The world needs an affordable one and those who argue for fusion believe that it can deliver.

Nathanael Johnson So, Andy, Clive wrote: «I think those who argue for the «good Anthropocene» are unscientific and live in a fantasy world of their own construction.»

If I'm wrong about your age, that's fine, but, don't make assumptions that people who argue for being reasonable aren't «hard core» enough.

Most arguments have been about the sentimental versus the practical, between people who prefer how paper pages feel in their hands and people who argue for the practicality of e-readers.

Can those who argue for staying the course identify instances where a school district leader discontinued a program or policy because research had shown it to be ineffective, or adopted a new program or policy based on a report in the What Works Clearinghouse?

Those who argue for an earlier transition to a Common Core aligned assessment have a point.

He flatly rejected the position of the Obama Administration, whose Justice Department had filed a brief siding with those who argue for a sweeping rejection of gene patents.

«The people who argue for maintaining these bans on student unit records were raising issues related to privacy, and we're very sensitive to those issues.

The power of proof by picture has changed how we see the world and our place within it — despite objections from some mathematicians who argue for more rigorous logic, writes University of Cambridge cosmologist John D. Barrow.

Such a transition has been made possible by the convergence of several factors: a stream of new science showing an accelerating pace of climate change and its impacts; the everyday experience of people witnessing the change around them (and seeing it on the evening news); the compelling portrayals of what is happening and why, such as Al Gore's documentary An Inconvenient Truth and the 2007 reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; and the shifting stances of constituencies as diverse as evangelical Christians (who argue for protecting the climate on grounds of stewardship of God's creation) and military leaders (who argue on grounds of national security).

«Some who argue for wikis?

Those who argue for civil liberties to be upheld regardless of the risk of terrorism are in a small minority.

The key section of his speech was these words: «Just as those who supported the dogma of big government were proved wrong, so, too, those who argue for the dogma of unbridled free - market forces have been proved wrong again.»

«Those who argue for the agreement say it is better to have an imperfect deal than to have nothing; that without the agreement, there would be no inspections, no snapback,» he wrote.

But whilst there has been disagreement over whether the tax should stay or go, everyone, including those who argue for the abolition of the 50p rate, points to the implicit political toxicity of doing so.

My problem with the people who argue for you to hide is that for the most part you have to CRANE to see anything when this happens.

Whenever the topic of rookie of the year comes up, the first thing people who argue for Ben Simmons will bring up is that Simmons is fifth in the league in assists at 8 per game, while Donovan Mitchell only averages 3.6 per game.

There are many people who argue for taking a QB with the # 1 pick.

Most people today who argue for separating church and state actually have as their intent to expunge acknowledgement of God from public life.

Klemke, I think, is an adequate representative of those who argue for the meaningfulness of the individual's life even though the universe may be empty of meaning itself.

In his «friendly criticism,» which we enjoy, Ed regrets that we've given so much room to contemporary philosophers of religion, for example Richard Swinburne and Alvin Plantinga, who argue for «theistic personalism.»

Le Goff's body of work, then, stands as a challenge to historians who argue for the Italian Renaissance and Reformation as a break that unleashed a series of forces, intended or not, ultimately leading to the current social imaginary.

Many of those who argue for vouchers say that they simply want to use competition to improve public education.

most modern christans who know the Bible realize about knowledge of God... those who argue for faithh in His exidstance and use Hebrews 11: 1 are just ripping it out of the Bible and ignoring the rest of Hebrews 11... as to agreeing with Paul..

Standing under the word in prayer while waiting for the clarification of the Spirit will satisfy neither those who argue for «justice now» nor those for whom the faith itself is at stake in this issue — and those people will necessarily continue their professions and protestations.

Then there are those who argue for a one world government.

Like those who argue for a young earth, many flat earthers used scriptural interpretation to bolster their belief.

People who argue for a literal interpretation of Genesis bring them together because their version of the creation of the Universe includes the creation of species.

My argument in a nutshell: many of the people who argue for such a right don't simply mean a right to be free from others» interference; they mean subsidized....

As noted by Friedersdorf, typically it is conservatives who argue for state's rights.

Thiel has supported the work of philosopher Nick Bostrom, who argues for weighing the value of the trillions of lives that will exist in the future in today's ethical calculations.

Mr. Flaherty's decision to stay with the status quo will disappoint those who argued for a stronger role for the Bank of Canada.

Those who argued for it did not argue that it was in fact justified, they argued that war always and everywhere demanded the unjustifiable:

Here's CJ's addition to it in the thread: As someone else who argues for Founderism in academic circles, I agree with what you say here.

I wish someone had told that to the Reformers, some of whom were burned for translating the Bible into their native languages so people could read it, who argued for salvation by grace against a salvation by works Gospel, who argued for Jesus as the son of God, uncreated, instead of just one among many of «God's» created beings.

The US right wing are so poorly read they tend to label anyone who argues for increased economic equality as Marxist.

Contrast J.D. Kingsbury, Matthew: Structure, Christology, Kingdom, Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1975, who argues for the primacy of «the Son of God» title in Matthew's christology.

It is the market economist who argues for hope, who points to creativity when others push for control, who recognizes that people are good, in a fundamental, real sense: assets, not liabilities.

In this, Mandelson has allies in James Purnell and Ed Miliband, the Climate Change Secretary, and an enemy in Ed Balls, who argues for precisely such a divide.

Throughout the evidence session, Mr Copson emphasised that there was no constitutional reason to have automatic places for the Bishops, and anyone who argued for their retention was simply arguing to extend a religious privilege which has no place in a modern, liberal and diverse democracy.