Sentences with phrase «who argues»

He deserves a mention for performing well since his inception, but anyone who argues he's good enough to be our primary DM is kidding themselves on — not the first instance a fan has overstated the ability of one of their own.

Jay Baer, who argues that today's customer service is a «spectator sport» and that companies who do not answer every customer complaint across every channel do so at their own peril.

Murray Goulburn managing director Gary Helou, who argues that MG's bid would create a «super-sized co-operative» to take on the world, has rejected a merger with Bega.

I agree with Tim Keller, who argues that the gospel is «both one and more than that.»

It is the market economist who argues for hope, who points to creativity when others push for control, who recognizes that people are good, in a fundamental, real sense: assets, not liabilities.

A person who argues with athiests is stupid..

And to think you declare me one who argues from unreasonableness [insulting, juvenile, who lacks content].

The movement seeks to rebut the work of Jürgen Moltmann, for instance, who argues in his Religion, Revolution and the Future that the church, to be authentic, must be heterogeneous, reconciling the educated and the uneducated, black and white, high and low.

And anybody who argues this point is guilty if they condone this behavior.

Contrast J.D. Kingsbury, Matthew: Structure, Christology, Kingdom, Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1975, who argues for the primacy of «the Son of God» title in Matthew's christology.

We looking outside world for answer, who can close the eyes and detach themselves from the world and simply merge in the goodness and love in heart and feel the best what we have, never worry or argue the different name of God or argue who is superior or inferior, the people who argues never even know himself or herself and started defying anything which cant be define, We can answer the very question of God and super power, it is not complicated, close the eyes, breath deeply and start detaching yourself from outside world and stop controlling your body, your thoughts, your so called worldly knowledge, ego and just feel the power and light within, you sure will get answer, it wont be Christ, Krishna, Allah, Those names wont matter, You will merge into supreme strength, and peace, we will have answer then, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO FIND ANSWER LOOKING INSIDE OUT, WHEN ANSWER IS WITHIN,

Ronald Preston who argues that the market is an efficient mechanism for the limited purpose of economic growth.

The judging God is found in the man who argues with God.

It should not be surprising then that Whitehead thought of God as a single actual entity immune to the possibility of loss.59 At least William Christian sees this as the proper Whiteheadian view.60 Nevertheless, Christian's position is challenged by Ivor Leclerc, who argues, in agreement with Hartshorne, that Christian's conclusion is incompatible with the categoreal scheme elaborated in chapter two of Process and Reality.61 Here, according to Leclerc, Whitehead «makes clear» that the category of «subjective perishing» is «necessarily applicable to every actual entity whatever, including God.»

The US right wing are so poorly read they tend to label anyone who argues for increased economic equality as Marxist.

Would you debate with someone who argues that the sky is yellow, up is down, left is right, a tree is a lamp, or black is white?

You never get a Christ who argues, who's angry, who deals with women, who heals people.

The pope didn't actually mention the world - famous scientist, who argues in a book published last month that the laws of physics show there is no need for a supreme being to have brought the world into existence.

For responses to Pols, who argues that Whitehead's philosophy precludes human freedom, see Lewis S. Ford, «Can Whitehead Provide for Real Subjective Agency?»

The saying, therefore, belongs to the positive sayings about the Baptist and as such would have to be rejected, on Bultmann's grounds, as having a Sitz zm Leben in anti-Jewish polemic in the early Church, (As indeed it is by E. Jüngel, the only recent contributor to the discussion to deny the authenticity of the saying, who argues that Matthew has set John on the side of Jesus «aus antijüdischer Polemik» [Paulus und Jesus (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr [Paul Siebeck], 1964), p. 191].

The evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins, who argues that science shows that God is a «delusion», is only the latest and one of the loudest of this group of anti-religious propagandists.

Those good christian's are the type of christian's I associate with, not the type like you who argues the stupidest crap and pretends to be holier than thou (lets not forget the fact that you have already admitted to using Captain America as your other alias or at least CA admitted that you were the same person).

The first comes from Frank Viola, who argues that there are now four major streams within evangelicalism, particularly among Christians in their 20s, 30s, and 40s:

The pope didn't actually mention the world - famous scientist, who argues in a book published last month that the laws of physics show there is no need for a supreme... \

Christians may also he attracted to an approach advanced by former Harvard professor John Hart Ely who argues that courts should not themselves choose substantive constitutional values, but should issue rulings that keep the processes of political debate and decision - making open to all.

I agree with Ted Kooser, who argues in his excellent Poetry Home Repair Manual that it is far better to risk being sentimental than it is to accept a dry, emotionless kind of poetry.

Don't misunderstand me; some evolutionists (particularly some of the neo-atheists like Richard Dawkins, who argues in his new book people who don't believe in evolution are on the same level as Holocaust deniers) have gone ape over their theory (forgive the pun) to the point that they seem to forget it is a theory, and refer to it as if it is an undeniable scientific fact.

Here's CJ's addition to it in the thread: As someone else who argues for Founderism in academic circles, I agree with what you say here.

Authers goes on to quote Amin Rajan of U.K. consultancy Create, who argues, «The more money that goes into passive, the more they (index funds) will become dumb.»

The Labor Department's proposal also has its share of critics on Capitol Hill, including Sen. Orrin Hatch (R - Utah), the new chairman of the Finance Committee, who argues that DoL is attempting to regulate outside its proper jurisdiction, and has authored legislation that would enshrine regulatory authority over the IRA sector within the Treasury Department.

I have run across Robert Farmer who argues against the natural rate of unemployment hypothesis with implications for not raising interest rates.

Thiel has supported the work of philosopher Nick Bostrom, who argues for weighing the value of the trillions of lives that will exist in the future in today's ethical calculations.

«A lot of business owners think that they have to do it all, [but] there's a lot of stress that goes along with that level of control, power and decision - making,» says Schembri, who argues power - hungry entrepreneurs can benefit from a personal trainer.

That includes Attorney General candidate Jeff Sessions, who argues that legal immigration primarily benefits economic elites at the expense of workers, but has also made racist statements.

He cites the Oxford Internet Institute's James Williams, who argues that «distracted moments can quickly lead to distracted days,» and former Google employee Tristan Harris, who argues that smartphone technologies are designed to «hijack the mind.»

The Energy Department plan drew criticism from natural gas producers, grid operators and others who argued it would undermine competition in wholesale power markets.

In the other corner sit mainstream business economists, who argue that Carney, in a rare occurrence, missed the point.

The European Commission ruled in August that Apple should pay back 13 billion euros ($ 13.6 billion)-- a decision contested by the Irish government, who argued that the EU was interfering with its sovereignty.

August Flentje, who argued the government's case for the Department of Justice in front of the Ninth Circuit judges on Tuesday, has not disputed that Trump and Giuliani made those statements.

The decision deals a blow to retailers, grocers and restaurant owners who argued the charges were unfairly high.

The proposed deal raised a number of red flags for shareholders and analysts who argued that it was simply a bailout of unprofitable SolarCity, not to mention a mess of conflicts of interest.

These newest results boost the case of the those who argue that immersing yourself in a fictional world populated by layered, complex characters can't help but increase your understanding of how the human mind works and make your fellow humans a little less strange to you.

As noted by Friedersdorf, typically it is conservatives who argue for state's rights.

In particular, there are those who argue that Facebook fueled Trump's rise by circulating a host of fake news stories about political topics, and these stories helped tip the scale in his favor.

Amid pressure from investors who argued the company had stretched itself too thin, Hess has shed assets and is moving forward as a streamlined company.

On the other side of the debate, we have the ISPs like AT&T and Comcast, who argue that a re-classification of broadband providers the Internet under Title II (which was originally written for old phone networks) by the FCC is both out - of - date and without legal merit.

Yes, there are a number of experts who argue that, because lotteries are voluntary — you have to be in it to win it, after all — they can't possibly be a tax.

Ulbricht's sentencing has sparked protests from proponents of Internet freedom, Vice notes, including movie star Russell Brand, who argued that Ulbricht was merely achieving the «American Dream.»

This is familiar ground for the SocGen strategist, who argued back in April that the British government could «concrete over the entire length and breadth of the UK and house prices would still rise» arguing that Britain doesn't actually have a shortage of housing, just a big imbalance in supply and demand.

But there are some mortgage professionals who argue that the catalyst for a national reaction has already arrived by way of the federal government, which deliberately cooled the market by tightening mortgage regulations.