Sentences with phrase «who at least try»

(Admittedly, that is unfair to the skeptics like Ira and Willis who at least try to fight against this sort of clear nonsense in violation of basic laws of physics.)
You've got a kid who at least tried it which is great.
Notable among them is Scott H. Greenfield, who at least tried Twitter (for a week) before condemning it in a post at his blog, Simple Justice.
The rest of us have to make do with sublunary Freud, Jung, and other analysts of the modern unconscious — who at least tried to reach for the heavens with sex and mythical archetypes.

Not exact matches

Journalists and doctors who have tried the test called it painless, but a look at Yelp reviews of one Theranos location, at a Walgreens in Palo Alto, shows that at least one person claims their finger was bruised.
These «little» leaders who are drinking their own Kool - Aid and who think you can fool all of the people at least some of the time (while you're trying to figure things out) are on their way to a rude awakening and an abrupt collision.
Every member of the Insider Picks team who tried the Misen knives received at least a comment or two from somebody else who used them.
Someone who has been with the president at least since the general election, and so can not be accused of trying to undermine him, can make a credible case that the president has undermined himself.
Couples who want to get pregnant and have traveled to the area should wait at least eight weeks before trying to conceive.
Another Reddit user responded: «I understand that some people genuinely have to limit their salt intake as much as possible (McDonald's isn't really the best place to practice that sort of diet, but hey, not my life) but for me, at least, it's easy to tell who genuinely needs it salt free and who's just trying to get the freshest fries they can.»
Akhmetshin, a Russian - born lobbyist who since at least last year has been working with the lawyer, Veselnitskaya, to try to overturn a US law sanctioning Russians, confirmed his participation in the meeting to the Associated Press on Friday.
You have to be out there.we have given out at least 16,000 samples, so there are a lot of people who have tried it.
Perhaps most notable, according to the July 6 notice, is the fact that the IRS is only trying to obtain records on users who have conducted «at least the equivalent of $ 20,000 in any one transaction type (buy, sell, send, or receive) in any one year during the 2013 - 2015 period».
At least two individuals who have been running the Lightning Network on the Bitcoin mainnet have apparently lost funds due to bugs when they tried to close payment channels.
Action: Approach VPNs with extreme caution Who is this for: All web users — unless free Internet access is not available in your country How difficult is it: No additional effort Tell me more: While there may be times when you feel tempted to sign up and use a VPN service — say, to try to circumvent geoblocks so you can stream video content that's not otherwise available in your country — if you do this you should assume that the service provider will at very least be recording everything you're doing online.
-- You can convince your VCs of reviewing on a monthly base only those metrics that will measure progress more accurately at this stage, instead of all the financial data which is not relevant — You can set up the right financial systems / software to help measure basic financial information, and allow your VC access to additional financial figures every quarter or by request If none of these work: — You can try convincing your VC of using the right metrics as well as the financial ones, and to be measured by a mix of both — You can hire a seasoned part - time CFO who can at least free you of the hurdle of putting the numbers together
Are you the day - trader type who has time to carefully monitor the ticker and (at least try to) sell off your penny stock at the right moment?
The bill appears to be heading toward the finish line, though at least three other Republican senators remained publicly undecided on Friday, including Mike Lee of Utah, who has allied with Mr. Rubio in pressing for an expanded child credit, and Jeff Flake of Arizona, who has been trying to extract commitments from Republican leadership related to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program.
People there are trying to do serious work and his views, at least in the minds of people who do the type of work JPL does, are insane and in direct conflict with the work they're trying to do.
Then I continued to try and find the truth (wherever it took me) and I've since become an agnostic atheist who believes that people like Jesus and Sidhartha (or at least, the people who wrote the stories about them) had true wisdom to bestow.
Some of them, maybe most, will have at least one parent or another relative who could take care of them, though the adults sometimes tried to hide that from us; they figure we will take better care of the children than they can, plus they won't have another mouth to feed.
At this point in my life I want to be with individuals and communities who are at least trying to learn the art of invitation and attempting to shed the disease of demanAt this point in my life I want to be with individuals and communities who are at least trying to learn the art of invitation and attempting to shed the disease of demanat least trying to learn the art of invitation and attempting to shed the disease of demand.
If they didn't try to stone you on the spot, you would at least be condemned as a heretic liberal who deserved to spend eternity in the deepest hell.
In presenting an argument, I just wish that those who try to tear down the integrity of the Old Testament prophets would at least be honest, transparent, with the other point of view.
The dispersal and re-emergence of Israel was not a self - fullfilling prophecy: the dispersal portion certainly was not, as the Romans did not conquer Israel with the intent to fulfill Bible prophecy; at the time of the prophecy, there would have been no reason to believe that there would be people who would try to Israel; the people who founded modern Israel were, at least in the main, non-religious and were not trying to fulfill the Bible's prediction; and finally, considering the almost continual obstacles (wars) faced by Israel since the day of its founding, sucess at restoring Israel was far from certain.
In practice, most people are at least partially aware of this problem and so vote for one of the two major parties, who divide up their positions to try and get just over half of the practical voters.
In conclusion, I do find it interesting that those who are raising concerns about all that happened and is happening are doing so unafraid in the public forum of my post with a lot of emotion and intelligence, while those who are trying to silence the discussion or at least control it are contacting me privately outside of the public forum with words that attempt to direct, intimidate or shame me.
On the one hand, persons who have tried to pray without getting very far with it are apt to feel that if only someone would teach them — give them a book of instructions, or a course, or at least a lecture or two — the difficulties would all be cleared away.
Trying to make two (at least) separate religions, Hindu and (a cultic) Vaishnava is to play into the hands of all those who would divide.
My 20 yrs in Africa has revealed Americans who claim they care about 20,000 children dying every day from hunger and disease are guilty of the same useless rhetoric they criticize in politicians who are at least trying to stop unnecessary daily deaths in this country, by getting elected and passing moral laws.
Rebecca Solnit is frustrated that so many liberals are letting occasional policy disagreements blind them to the fact that Obama is the only candidate who's even trying to be on their side, which to her mind should earn him at least a little bit of loyalty and ideological slack - cutting.
If the Christian right seeks to gain earthly political power (something Christ himself rejected when tempted by Satan), why don't they at least try to find candidates who support the very issues Christ actually spoke about & challenged us to address as his followers?
At least Christians have moral teachings to try to counterbalance and tame disputes, unlike atheists who have absolutely no cohesive views on morality.
God still has and always will have his own purposes, and those who believe in him best begin by at least trying to discover what those might be.
Among those who attribute value to all things, some insist that all things have equal value or, at least, that we have no business trying to make distinctions.
I decided would rather be with a group of people who at least were trying to develop morally, rather than with a gang who would rather degenerate morally.
They insisted that they were men and women who could at least try to act in a fashion appropriate to their having grown out of babyhood or childhood and advanced to late adolescence if not to full adulthood.
But when this life is over, what awaits those who have chosen to at least try to be faithful in Christ, are going to experience a life that just can't be sucessfully put into human terms.
sounds more like «corporate brainstorming», but what I was trying to suggest is that it appears that we're witnessing (not intentionally) an evolving understanding of what wd become more central to the narrative and eventually orthodox.That is, if you cdn't believe it, you were out the door.A good example wd be the higher Christology that the fourth gospel reflects and more specifically, the virgin birth which it (like Mark and Paul) doesn't mention.If the birth narratives that we're familiar with are absent from the earliest gospel and the most theological gospel that came decades later, and can only be found in the other two gospels that we know used the first, it at least suggests a growing and evolving understanding of who Jesus «was» and «is».
God would prefer men in this role so if I knew any better you probably got divorce at least once trying to take the place of the man and lead the house because that is exactly what you sound like a women who will not play the role she is meant to play and just be submissive.
At least he is not like a most TV ministers who try to scare the h.ell out of you and tell you what an undeserving piece of garbage you are.
You, at least, try to console me, and say that I promise to assist at the hour of death, with all the graces necessary for salvation, all those who, on the first Saturday of five consecutive months go to confession and receive Holy Communion, recite five decades of the rosary and keep me company for a quarter of an hour while meditating on the mysteries of the rosary, with the intention of making reparation to me.»
We will find out who is right in the end, but in the meantime all I am asking is that you at least try and see things from the Christian perspective, as I try to see things from the atheistic perspective.
I have no idea who the two of your are trying to convince, but at least you are giving me, and every other non-christian, a good laugh.
We need at least a significant minority who have tried to understand the deep history of the great cultures of the world.
I am a musician and a writer, plus a dabbler in drawing and other artistic «crafty» endeavors so I always interpret things from a deep emotional point of view which hasn't always worked in my favour (at least it didn't in the church I attended) and alienated me from non-artistic people who called me too sensitive and too picky and too obsessive and too emotionally involved with just about everything I did, or tried to do.
The controversy is simply people who don't like Fox News trying to claim one of their news anchors is a stupid racist — when it is the people criticizing her who are stupid (or, at least, misinformed about racial categories) and / or racist (if they deny that Jesus was white).
According to Winters, I --- or at least a certain Mr. «Donio» --- try to «twist Pope Francis into the kind of Catholic neo-con who, well, the kind who reads....
I've read a lot of the more controversial postings recently (such as the recent ones on Hell and Homosexuality as well as some older ones about the definition of the gospel) where it seems that the debates in the comment section always fail (at least for me) to help those who are trying to learn.
As the first step in evangelisation, we must try to keep this search alive... I think that the Church should open today a sort of «court of the gentiles»... to dialogue with those for whom religion is something foreign, to whom God is unknown, and who nonetheless would not like simply to remain without God, but at least to approach him as the Unknown.»
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z